ab-test-plan
Design a statistically rigorous A/B or multivariate test plan — If/Then/Because hypothesis, control and variant specs, required sample size per variant…
Retrieve validated marketing learnings from the brand's compound intelligence graph for a channel, audience, objective, or freeform situation — returned as a themed, decision-ready playbook ranked by confidence and recency, with conflicting insights flagged and quick wins called
$ npx -y skills add indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro --skill recall --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/recallContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Retrieve validated marketing learnings from the brand's compound intelligence graph for a channel, audience, objective, or freeform situation — returned as a themed, decision-ready playbook ranked by confidence and recency, with conflicting insights flagged and quick wins called
name: recall description: "Retrieve validated marketing learnings from the brand's compound intelligence graph for a channel, audience, objective, or freeform situation — returned as a themed, decision-ready playbook ranked by confidence and recency, with conflicting insights flagged and quick wins called out. Triggers on \"/digital-marketing-pro:recall\", \"what do we know about email for this audience\", \"what worked last time we ran a launch campaign\", \"pull past learnings before I plan this\", \"recall insights about paid social\". Reads the brand profile for context boosting and queries the graph via intelligence-graph.py; it retrieves and synthesizes existing learnings — it does not record new ones."
Retrieve relevant learnings from the brand's compound intelligence graph. Given a context — channel, audience, objective, or situation — return the most relevant validated insights ranked by confidence and recency. Turns accumulated marketing knowledge into an actionable playbook for any scenario, so past learnings directly inform current decisions without relying on memory or searching through old reports.
The user must provide (or will be prompted for):
1. **Load brand context**: Read `~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json` for the active slug, then load `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json`. Apply brand industry, audience segments, and active channels to contextualize the query and boost relevance of matching learnings. Check for agency SOPs at `~/.claude-marketing/sops/`. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/digital-marketing-pro:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults. 2. **Query the intelligence graph**: Execute `python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/intelligence-graph.py" --brand {slug} --action query-relevant --context '{context_json}' --min-confidence {threshold}`. The query matches against all indexed conditions — channel, audience, objective, campaign type — and also performs semantic matching for freeform situation descriptions. `--min-confidence` applies the confidence-threshold filter; apply the time-range preference during ranking (step 3), not as a query flag. 3. **Rank results**: Score each returned learning by a composite of relevance (how closely the learning's conditions match the query context), confidence (how validated the insight is based on accumulated evidence), and recency (how recently the learning was recorded or last updated, with a decay curve that weights recent learnings higher for volatile channels). Return the top results by composite score. 4. **Group into actionable themes**: Cluster the ranked learnings into coherent themes — e.g., "Content & Messaging" (what to say), "Timing & Frequency" (when to say it), "Audience Behavior" (how they respond), "Channel Tactics" (platform-specific techniques), and "Things to Avoid" (validated anti-patterns). Each theme gets a summary sentence synthesizing the grouped insights. 5. **Highlight conflicting insights**: Identify any learnings within the results that contradict each other — flag these explicitly with both sides of the conflict, their respective confidence scores, and conditions that may explain the difference (e.g., "true for SMB but not enterprise"). Recommend which to follow based on confidence and recency, or suggest an A/B test to resolve the conflict. 6. **Present as actionable playbook**: Format the output as a decision-ready playbook — themed sections with ranked learnings, a "quick wins" callout for high-confidence actionable insights, a "test these" callout for lower-confidence hypotheses worth validating, and a "watch out" callout for validated anti-patterns and conflicts.
Your agency just signed a 50-brand client. The previous agency left no playbook. Three brands are bleeding budget, two have stale positioning, one is launching in a regulated jurisdiction next month. Where do you start?
Repo: indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro
Design a statistically rigorous A/B or multivariate test plan — If/Then/Because hypothesis, control and variant specs, required sample size per variant…
Generate 3-5 ad copy variations per platform — headlines, descriptions, and CTAs formatted to Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, X, and Pinterest specs — each…
Walk through adding a custom MCP server integration to the plugin — searches npm for an existing MCP package (or scaffolds a custom server from the plugin's…
Audit how a brand appears across the 6 canonical AI answer surfaces — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot — probing 10-25…
Strategy module for Answer Engine / Generative Engine Optimization — audits AI visibility, restructures content for citation, runs entity-consistency checks…
Generate a portfolio-level dashboard across ALL client brands — per-client RAG health scores, campaign activity, budget pacing, aggregate KPIs, team…