/adhoc
Adhoc workflow for small targeted changes to existing behavior or appearance, without the full story ceremony. Use when the orchestrator encounters a bug with a clear root cause and surgical solution, OR a small enhancement to something already built (a different icon, wording,
$ npx -y skills add drobins25/craft --skill adhoc --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/adhoc
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Adhoc workflow for small targeted changes to existing behavior or appearance, without the full story ceremony. Use when the orchestrator encounters a bug with a clear root cause and surgical solution, OR a small enhancement to something already built (a different icon, wording,
SKILL.md
adhoc.SKILL.mdname: adhoc
description: "Adhoc workflow for small targeted changes to existing behavior or appearance, without the full story ceremony. Use when the orchestrator encounters a bug with a clear root cause and surgical solution, OR a small enhancement to something already built (a different icon, wording, spacing, color). Triggers on: 'fix this', 'this is broken', 'the alignment is off', 'that button doesn't work', 'quick fix', 'patch this', 'tweak this', 'change the icon', 'adjust the wording', post-story corrections, or any situation where the write gate blocks a small targeted change. Acts NOW - deferred work belongs in the notebook. Do NOT use for new features, design exploration, or changes requiring creative spark."
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Edit", "Write", "Glob", "Grep", "Bash", "AskUserQuestion", "TaskCreate", "TaskUpdate"]
<!-- EDITORS: This file is the shared SHELL only - guards, classification, write gate, todo-satisfaction detection, commit step. The actual flows live in references/fix.md (bugs) and references/tweak.md (enhancements). Flow changes go THERE, not here. -->
Adhoc
You are the orchestrator making a small targeted change. No implementer agent, no chunks, no story ceremony. Adhoc work comes in two flavors: a **fix** (something is broken and you can see why) and a **tweak** (something works as built, but the user wants it different). This shell classifies which one you're holding, then runs the matching flow from its reference file.
Why This Exists
The full story ceremony is right for features and complex work. But when a button doesn't respond - or a shipped icon just isn't the one the user wants - spinning up that machinery wastes time and adds no value. Fixes and tweaks need different treatment: a fix is gated on root-cause confidence ("will it work"), a tweak on visual fit ("will it fit"). Both leave permanent records for pattern analysis, in separate corpora.
Step 1: Guard Rails
**Active story check:** If CURRENT_STORY is set in `.global-state`, warn: "There's an active story ([name]). Apply this change within that story's scope, or complete/pause the story first." Do not set CRAFT_WRITE_ENABLED if it's already set by a story - that would create overlapping write sessions.
**No new features:** Adhoc work changes something that already exists. If the solution adds something that wasn't there before (a new component, a new API endpoint, a new element on the page), it's a story.
**No design exploration:** If the change requires choosing between creative directions, it's a story (or design-vibe). Adhoc executes a known intent.
Step 2: Classify - Fix or Tweak
Apply the tie-breaker:
- **Fix:** the change restores something that used to work, or makes behavior match a stated spec. There is a symptom and a root cause. ("The button doesn't respond." "Font weights render wrong.")
- **Tweak:** the change alters something working as built because it doesn't look or read right. Nothing is broken; taste or intent changed. ("I want a different icon." "That heading is too loud.")
- **Ambiguous from the words alone** ("the icon looks wrong", "this card looks bad"): **look before asking.** Screenshot or inspect the target first - broken-in-evidence (clipped, overflowing, misaligned, regressed) classifies as a fix; renders-as-built-but-displeasing classifies as a tweak. Ask the user only if the evidence doesn't settle it. Never silently pick a lane on a guess. Keep the shot: it becomes the fix path's symptom evidence or the tweak path's before-shot.
Step 3: Open the Gate
# Open the write gate
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/update-global-state.sh CRAFT_WRITE_ENABLED "true" "${CRAFT_PROJECT_ROOT:-.}"
# Safety marker - session-start.sh clears orphans
echo "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S)" > "${CRAFT_PROJECT_ROOT:-.}/.craft/.active-fix"Create the close-obligation task pair so the open gate stays visible even if the conversation drifts:
1. **TaskCreate** - "Adhoc [fix|tweak]: [brief description]" - set `in_progress`. 2. **TaskCreate** - "Close write gate" (description: "Set CRAFT_WRITE_ENABLED='' after the adhoc work is done.") - set `addBlockedBy` to the work task's ID.
The gate stays open for the whole work thread - including follow-up requests and tweak attempt loops. The pending "Close write gate" task is the closure obligation.
Step 4: Run the Flow
Read the matching reference file and execute it inline (never via the Skill tool):
- **Fix** -> Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/adhoc/references/fix.md`
- **Tweak** -> Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/adhoc/references/tweak.md`
The reference owns the record file, the gate question (confidence vs fit), the edits, and validation. It hands back here for each commit.
**Soft scope check (both flavors):** If you find yourself touching 5+ files, pause and tell the user: "This is touching [N] files - that's getting bigger than a typical adhoc change. Want me to continue or create a story?" Let them decide.
Step 5: Commit
Runs after each validated set of edits (a fix's single pass, or each tweak attempt). Stage ONLY the files the change touched - never the whole tree. The staged set comes from the record file's `files_changed`; if that list is empty or stale, fall back to `git diff --name-only HEAD` so real changes are never silently dropped.
cd "${CRAFT_PROJECT_ROOT:-.}"
# Stage each file from the record's files_changed list
git add -- [path from files_changed] [path from files_changed] ...
# Fallback ONLY if files_changed is empty or 0: stage the tracked changes
# git diff --name-only HEAD | while IFS= read -r f; do git add -- "$f"; done
git diff --cached --quiet || git commit -m "fix: [short description]" --no-verifyDo NOT use `git add -A` or `git add .` - either would sweep unrelated untracked files (scratch files, local configs, secrets) into the commit.
Commit message prefix: `fix:` for fixes, `tweak:` for tweaks. Example: `tweak: settings
Read more
name: adhoc description: "Adhoc workflow for small targeted changes to existing behavior or appearance, without the full story ceremony. Use when the orchestrator encounters a bug with a clear root cause and surgical solution, OR a small enhancement to something already built (a different icon, wording, spacing, color). Triggers on: 'fix this', 'this is broken', 'the alignment is off', 'that button doesn't work', 'quick fix', 'patch this', 'tweak this', 'change the icon', 'adjust the wording', post-story corrections, or any situation where the write gate blocks a small targeted change. Acts NOW - deferred work belongs in the notebook. Do NOT use for new features, design exploration, or changes requiring creative spark." allowed-tools: ["Read", "Edit", "Write", "Glob", "Grep", "Bash", "AskUserQuestion", "TaskCreate", "TaskUpdate"]
<!-- EDITORS: This file is the shared SHELL only - guards, classification, write gate, todo-satisfaction detection, commit step. The actual flows live in references/fix.md (bugs) and references/tweak.md (enhancements). Flow changes go THERE, not here. -->
Adhoc
You are the orchestrator making a small targeted change. No implementer agent, no chunks, no story ceremony. Adhoc work comes in two flavors: a **fix** (something is broken and you can see why) and a **tweak** (something works as built, but the user wants it different). This shell classifies which one you're holding, then runs the matching flow from its reference file.
Why This Exists
The full story ceremony is right for features and complex work. But when a button doesn't respond - or a shipped icon just isn't the one the user wants - spinning up that machinery wastes time and adds no value. Fixes and tweaks need different treatment: a fix is gated on root-cause confidence ("will it work"), a tweak on visual fit ("will it fit"). Both leave permanent records for pattern analysis, in separate corpora.
Step 1: Guard Rails
**Active story check:** If CURRENT_STORY is set in `.global-state`, warn: "There's an active story ([name]). Apply this change within that story's scope, or complete/pause the story first." Do not set CRAFT_WRITE_ENABLED if it's already set by a story - that would create overlapping write sessions.
**No new features:** Adhoc work changes something that already exists. If the solution adds something that wasn't there before (a new component, a new API endpoint, a new element on the page), it's a story.
**No design exploration:** If the change requires choosing between creative directions, it's a story (or design-vibe). Adhoc executes a known intent.
Step 2: Classify - Fix or Tweak
Apply the tie-breaker:
- **Fix:** the change restores something that used to work, or makes behavior match a stated spec. There is a symptom and a root cause. ("The button doesn't respond." "Font weights render wrong.")
- **Tweak:** the change alters something working as built because it doesn't look or read right. Nothing is broken; taste or intent changed. ("I want a different icon." "That heading is too loud.")
- **Ambiguous from the words alone** ("the icon looks wrong", "this card looks bad"): **look before asking.** Screenshot or inspect the target first - broken-in-evidence (clipped, overflowing, misaligned, regressed) classifies as a fix; renders-as-built-but-displeasing classifies as a tweak. Ask the user only if the evidence doesn't settle it. Never silently pick a lane on a guess. Keep the shot: it becomes the fix path's symptom evidence or the tweak path's before-shot.
Step 3: Open the Gate
# Open the write gate
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/update-global-state.sh CRAFT_WRITE_ENABLED "true" "${CRAFT_PROJECT_ROOT:-.}"
# Safety marker - session-start.sh clears orphans
echo "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S)" > "${CRAFT_PROJECT_ROOT:-.}/.craft/.active-fix"Create the close-obligation task pair so the open gate stays visible even if the conversation drifts:
1. **TaskCreate** - "Adhoc [fix|tweak]: [brief description]" - set `in_progress`. 2. **TaskCreate** - "Close write gate" (description: "Set CRAFT_WRITE_ENABLED='' after the adhoc work is done.") - set `addBlockedBy` to the work task's ID.
The gate stays open for the whole work thread - including follow-up requests and tweak attempt loops. The pending "Close write gate" task is the closure obligation.
Step 4: Run the Flow
Read the matching reference file and execute it inline (never via the Skill tool):
- **Fix** -> Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/adhoc/references/fix.md`
- **Tweak** -> Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/adhoc/references/tweak.md`
The reference owns the record file, the gate question (confidence vs fit), the edits, and validation. It hands back here for each commit.
**Soft scope check (both flavors):** If you find yourself touching 5+ files, pause and tell the user: "This is touching [N] files - that's getting bigger than a typical adhoc change. Want me to continue or create a story?" Let them decide.
Step 5: Commit
Runs after each validated set of edits (a fix's single pass, or each tweak attempt). Stage ONLY the files the change touched - never the whole tree. The staged set comes from the record file's `files_changed`; if that list is empty or stale, fall back to `git diff --name-only HEAD` so real changes are never silently dropped.
cd "${CRAFT_PROJECT_ROOT:-.}"
# Stage each file from the record's files_changed list
git add -- [path from files_changed] [path from files_changed] ...
# Fallback ONLY if files_changed is empty or 0: stage the tracked changes
# git diff --name-only HEAD | while IFS= read -r f; do git add -- "$f"; done
git diff --cached --quiet || git commit -m "fix: [short description]" --no-verifyDo NOT use `git add -A` or `git add .` - either would sweep unrelated untracked files (scratch files, local configs, secrets) into the commit.
Commit message prefix: `fix:` for fixes, `tweak:` for tweaks. Example: `tweak: settings
Showing the first part of this file.
Stop Vibing. Start Crafting. Claude Code plugin: guided + controlled development orchestration harness with built-in workflow + state management, for designing + building durable, production-ready software through the entire product lifecycle - new projects
Repo: drobins25/craft
Other skills on craft.
- /approve
Request write permission from the user before making file changes. MUST be invoked before any write attempt when the write gate is closed. Creates scoped approval via AskUserQuestion + TaskCreate, opens the write gate, and closes it when work is done. Triggers: write hook blocks
Open skill - /browser
Interactive browser automation via playwright-cli. Use when you need to navigate a site, click elements, fill forms, take snapshots, or triage a live app.
Open skill - /content-spark
This skill should be used when a story has been captured but content direction is unresolved - the spark describes WHAT to build structurally but not WHAT goes in it. Reads the story spark, splits it into Resolved (structurally clear) vs. Assumed (would have to guess) content
Open skill - /creative-spark
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm", "explore options", "get creative", "what if we...", or selects "Let's get creative" during story or cycle creation. Also appropriate when the user describes a vague feature idea without clear direction. Generates 2-3
Open skill - /design-vibe
Use this skill when the user wants to discover, define, or refine their product's aesthetic identity. Triggers on "what should this feel like?", "help me figure out the vibe", "something feels off visually", "I want it to feel like [X]", "define the visual language", or when a
Open skill - /lock-decision
This skill should be used when the user says "lock it", "go with that", "approved", "that's the standard", or explicitly establishes a project-wide pattern like "from now on all forms should use this approach". Formalizes approved decisions into locked standards that the system
Open skill

