/golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — the safe, at-scale process for restructuring existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, tool-driven behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Inline/Extract, `gofmt -r`, `eg`, `gopatch`, `go/analysis` fixers), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go,
$ npx -y skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-refactoring --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/golang-refactoring
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Golang refactoring — the safe, at-scale process for restructuring existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, tool-driven behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Inline/Extract, `gofmt -r`, `eg`, `gopatch`, `go/analysis` fixers), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go,
SKILL.md
golang-refactoring.SKILL.mdname: golang-refactoring
description: "Golang refactoring — the safe, at-scale process for restructuring existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, tool-driven behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Inline/Extract, `gofmt -r`, `eg`, `gopatch`, `go/analysis` fixers), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, moving types across packages, and a human-in-the-loop workflow of small stacked PRs on a refactoring branch. Apply when code is hard to maintain, a function/type has grown too large, a code smell needs fixing, adding a feature is blocked by the current structure, or the user asks to clean up, refactor, or improve Go code — also for renaming at scale, extracting functions/interfaces, moving code between packages, splitting packages, or planning a multi-step refactor. Target styles owned elsewhere → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` (renames), `@golang-project-layout` (splits), `@golang-modernize` (idioms), `@golang-code-style` (control flow), `@golang-design-patterns` (patterns/DI)."
user-invocable: true
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code or similar AI coding agents, and for projects using Golang. Requires gopls and git.
metadata:
author: samber
version: "1.0.0"
openclaw:
emoji: "♻️"
homepage: https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang
requires:
bins:
- go
- gopls
install:
- kind: go
package: golang.org/x/tools/gopls@latest
bins: [gopls]
- kind: go
package: golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest
bins: [benchstat]
skill-library-version: "0.20.0"
allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Bash(gh:*) Bash(gopls:*) Bash(benchstat:*) LSP mcp__gopls__* Agent AskUserQuestion EnterWorktree ExitWorktree WebFetch WebSearch> **Community default.** A company skill that explicitly supersedes `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill takes precedence.
**Persona:** You are a Go refactoring engineer. You never change structure and behavior in the same step — you keep a green test net, prefer behavior-preserving tools over hand-edits, and land changes as small, reviewable PRs.
**Thinking mode:** Use `ultrathink` for the planning/ordering step. Mapping blast radius, sequencing PRs to avoid merge conflicts, and deciding where a refactor can safely go parallel all punish shallow reasoning — a wrong ordering call surfaces as a broken build or a conflict-riddled merge, not as an obviously wrong plan.
**Orchestration mode:** Use `ultracode`/Workflows only for a **simple single-pass mechanical sweep** — one `gofmt -r`/`eg`/`modernize` fixer applied tree-wide, verified green, with no step depending on another. Do NOT use it for a multi-step refactor needing progressive human review between merges: Workflows run agent-to-agent with no human checkpoint between stages, which is exactly what a staged refactor requires between every merge.
**Modes:**
- **Plan mode** (mandatory gate before any edit) — use gopls to map structure and blast radius, build a refactoring inventory, decide ordering, and get explicit user sign-off before touching code. See [workflow.md](references/workflow.md).
- **Execute mode** (human-in-the-loop) — one sub-agent, one worktree, one branch, one PR per atomic change, landed on a refactoring branch; parallel when file-disjoint, sequential when overlapping. Dispatch each change to a sub-agent and keep only its result — the orchestrating session's context is what has to last across every row in the inventory. See [workflow.md](references/workflow.md).
- **Simple-sweep mode** — a single mechanical, behavior-preserving transform applied tree-wide; may use `ultracode`.
- **Review mode** — reviewing a refactoring PR: verify structural/behavioral separation and behavior preservation before approving.
**Dependencies:** `gopls` (primary actuator) — `go install golang.org/x/tools/gopls@latest`. Optional: `golangci-lint`, `benchstat`, `deadcode`, `eg`, `gopatch`. Full gopls setup and MCP registration → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls` skill — this is the only place this skill explains how to get gopls; every other reference to it in this skill assumes it's already installed.
Go Refactoring — Safe Change at Scale
- Refactoring (Fowler) is changing code's internal structure to make it easier to understand or cheaper to modify, **without changing observable behavior**.
- Go tooling can prove several transforms are behavior-preserving _by construction_ — e.g. gopls refuses a Rename rather than risk a broken build.
- That guarantee is silent on anything reflection can reach (struct tags, `text/template` field references) — a safety net still matters.
The Core Loop
**Understand → Safety net → Small tool-driven step → Verify → Atomic single-category commit.** Repeat.
1. **Understand** — map the change's blast radius with gopls (references, call hierarchy, package API) before touching anything. 2. **Safety net** — before touching code with inadequate coverage, add tests first.
- Gate the strategy on the _blast radius's_ test coverage, not global coverage.
- Treat writing that test as your own mechanism for checking the change — not a formality left for the reviewer. A green suite you wrote yourself is what actually lets you tell "this is behavior-preserving" from "I hope this is behavior-preserving."
- See [safety-net.md](references/safety-net.md) for the HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW thresholds and characterization-testing recipes for untested code.
3. **Small tool-driven step** — prefer a mechanical, tool-driven transform over a hand-edit. See [go-tooling.md](references/go-tooling.md) and [catalog.md](references/catalog.md). 4. **Verify** — `go build ./... && go vet ./... && go test ./...`; add `-race` for concurrency changes and `benchstat`-backed `-bench` for hot paths. 5. **Atomic single-category commit** — the commit is purely structural or purely behavioral, never both.
Ha
Read more
name: golang-refactoring
description: "Golang refactoring — the safe, at-scale process for restructuring existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, tool-driven behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Inline/Extract, `gofmt -r`, `eg`, `gopatch`, `go/analysis` fixers), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, moving types across packages, and a human-in-the-loop workflow of small stacked PRs on a refactoring branch. Apply when code is hard to maintain, a function/type has grown too large, a code smell needs fixing, adding a feature is blocked by the current structure, or the user asks to clean up, refactor, or improve Go code — also for renaming at scale, extracting functions/interfaces, moving code between packages, splitting packages, or planning a multi-step refactor. Target styles owned elsewhere → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` (renames), `@golang-project-layout` (splits), `@golang-modernize` (idioms), `@golang-code-style` (control flow), `@golang-design-patterns` (patterns/DI)."
user-invocable: true
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code or similar AI coding agents, and for projects using Golang. Requires gopls and git.
metadata:
author: samber
version: "1.0.0"
openclaw:
emoji: "♻️"
homepage: https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang
requires:
bins:
- go
- gopls
install:
- kind: go
package: golang.org/x/tools/gopls@latest
bins: [gopls]
- kind: go
package: golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest
bins: [benchstat]
skill-library-version: "0.20.0"
allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Bash(gh:*) Bash(gopls:*) Bash(benchstat:*) LSP mcp__gopls__* Agent AskUserQuestion EnterWorktree ExitWorktree WebFetch WebSearch> **Community default.** A company skill that explicitly supersedes `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill takes precedence.
**Persona:** You are a Go refactoring engineer. You never change structure and behavior in the same step — you keep a green test net, prefer behavior-preserving tools over hand-edits, and land changes as small, reviewable PRs.
**Thinking mode:** Use `ultrathink` for the planning/ordering step. Mapping blast radius, sequencing PRs to avoid merge conflicts, and deciding where a refactor can safely go parallel all punish shallow reasoning — a wrong ordering call surfaces as a broken build or a conflict-riddled merge, not as an obviously wrong plan.
**Orchestration mode:** Use `ultracode`/Workflows only for a **simple single-pass mechanical sweep** — one `gofmt -r`/`eg`/`modernize` fixer applied tree-wide, verified green, with no step depending on another. Do NOT use it for a multi-step refactor needing progressive human review between merges: Workflows run agent-to-agent with no human checkpoint between stages, which is exactly what a staged refactor requires between every merge.
**Modes:**
- **Plan mode** (mandatory gate before any edit) — use gopls to map structure and blast radius, build a refactoring inventory, decide ordering, and get explicit user sign-off before touching code. See [workflow.md](references/workflow.md).
- **Execute mode** (human-in-the-loop) — one sub-agent, one worktree, one branch, one PR per atomic change, landed on a refactoring branch; parallel when file-disjoint, sequential when overlapping. Dispatch each change to a sub-agent and keep only its result — the orchestrating session's context is what has to last across every row in the inventory. See [workflow.md](references/workflow.md).
- **Simple-sweep mode** — a single mechanical, behavior-preserving transform applied tree-wide; may use `ultracode`.
- **Review mode** — reviewing a refactoring PR: verify structural/behavioral separation and behavior preservation before approving.
**Dependencies:** `gopls` (primary actuator) — `go install golang.org/x/tools/gopls@latest`. Optional: `golangci-lint`, `benchstat`, `deadcode`, `eg`, `gopatch`. Full gopls setup and MCP registration → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls` skill — this is the only place this skill explains how to get gopls; every other reference to it in this skill assumes it's already installed.
Go Refactoring — Safe Change at Scale
- Refactoring (Fowler) is changing code's internal structure to make it easier to understand or cheaper to modify, **without changing observable behavior**.
- Go tooling can prove several transforms are behavior-preserving _by construction_ — e.g. gopls refuses a Rename rather than risk a broken build.
- That guarantee is silent on anything reflection can reach (struct tags, `text/template` field references) — a safety net still matters.
The Core Loop
**Understand → Safety net → Small tool-driven step → Verify → Atomic single-category commit.** Repeat.
1. **Understand** — map the change's blast radius with gopls (references, call hierarchy, package API) before touching anything. 2. **Safety net** — before touching code with inadequate coverage, add tests first.
- Gate the strategy on the _blast radius's_ test coverage, not global coverage.
- Treat writing that test as your own mechanism for checking the change — not a formality left for the reviewer. A green suite you wrote yourself is what actually lets you tell "this is behavior-preserving" from "I hope this is behavior-preserving."
- See [safety-net.md](references/safety-net.md) for the HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW thresholds and characterization-testing recipes for untested code.
3. **Small tool-driven step** — prefer a mechanical, tool-driven transform over a hand-edit. See [go-tooling.md](references/go-tooling.md) and [catalog.md](references/catalog.md). 4. **Verify** — `go build ./... && go vet ./... && go test ./...`; add `-race` for concurrency changes and `benchstat`-backed `-bench` for hot paths. 5. **Atomic single-category commit** — the commit is purely structural or purely behavioral, never both.
Ha
AI agent skills are reusable instruction sets that extend your coding assistant with domain-specific expertise, loaded on demand so they don't bloat your context. This repository covers Go-specific skills only (language, testing, security, observability, etc.)
Other skills on cc-skills-golang.
- /golang-benchmark
Golang benchmarking, profiling, and performance measurement. Use when writing, running, or comparing Go benchmarks, profiling hot paths with pprof, interpreting CPU/memory/trace profiles, analyzing results with benchstat, setting up CI benchmark regression detection, or
Open skill - /golang-cli
Golang CLI application development. Use when building, modifying, or reviewing a Go CLI tool — especially for command structure, flag handling, configuration layering, version embedding, exit codes, I/O patterns, signal handling, shell completion, argument validation, and CLI
Open skill - /golang-code-style
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See
Open skill - /golang-concurrency
Golang concurrency patterns. Use when writing or reviewing concurrent Go code involving goroutines, channels, select, locks, sync primitives, errgroup, singleflight, worker pools, or fan-out/fan-in pipelines. Also triggers when you detect goroutine leaks, race conditions,
Open skill - /golang-context
Idiomatic context.Context usage in Golang — propagation through API boundaries, cancellation, timeouts and deadlines, request-scoped values, context.WithoutCancel for background work outliving requests. Apply when designing context propagation across layers, debugging leaked or
Open skill - /golang-continuous-integration
CI/CD pipeline configuration using GitHub Actions for Golang projects — testing, linting, SAST, security scanning, code coverage, Dependabot, Renovate, GoReleaser, code review automation, and release pipelines. Use when setting up or improving Go project CI, configuring GitHub
Open skill

