analytics-insights
Deep dive into product analytics — investigate a question, surface insights, build a data narrative. Use when you need to go beyond dashboards to understand…
Assess and respond to a competitor move within 24-48 hours. Use when a competitor launches, changes pricing, or makes a strategic shift.
$ npx -y skills add mrthames/lean-pm-skills --skill competitive-response --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/competitive-responseContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Assess and respond to a competitor move within 24-48 hours. Use when a competitor launches, changes pricing, or makes a strategic shift.
name: competitive-response description: Assess and respond to a competitor move within 24-48 hours. Use when a competitor launches, changes pricing, or makes a strategic shift.
A competitor just did something. You have 24-48 hours before sales starts losing deals, leadership starts asking questions, and your team starts wondering if the roadmap needs to change. Claude compresses the analysis; you make the strategic call.
**Traditional response:** Days to weeks of analysis, slide decks, meetings, and eventually a position paper no one reads.
**AI-native response:** 2-4 hours to assess, decide, and arm the team.
| Step | Time | Claude Does | You Do | |---|---|---|---| | Assess the move | 30 min | Gather public info, analyze what changed | Validate accuracy, add inside knowledge | | Evaluate impact | 30 min | Map impact to your users, deals, and roadmap | Apply strategic judgment | | Decide response | 30 min | Generate response options with trade-offs | Make the call: respond, monitor, or ignore | | Arm the team | 1 hr | Draft talking points, objection handlers, FAQs | Review and distribute |
[Competitor] just [describe what happened — launch, pricing change, acquisition, etc.]. Assess: - What exactly changed? (features, pricing, positioning, availability) - Who does this target? (which user segment or market) - What's the likely strategic intent? (growth play, retention, competitive blocking, new market) - How does this compare to what we offer? - What are they NOT doing that our users still need us for? Sources to check: [their website, changelog, press release, app store, social media]
Given this competitive move, evaluate the impact: On our users: - Which of our user segments overlap with their target? - Are any of our users likely to evaluate or switch? - Does this change what our users expect from us? On our pipeline/sales: - Will this come up in competitive deals? - Does it change our win/loss dynamics? - Do we need updated competitive positioning? On our roadmap: - Does this validate or invalidate anything we're building? - Does this change the urgency of any planned initiative? - Is there something we should accelerate, and what would we defer? Rate overall impact: high (threatens core business), medium (affects some segments or deals), low (noise, no action needed).
Generate response options: Option A — Respond directly: - What we'd build or change and timeline - What we'd defer to make room - Risk: are we chasing their strategy instead of executing ours? Option B — Monitor and prepare: - Watch for user/market reaction before committing resources - Prepare talking points for sales and CS now - Set a review point in [2-4 weeks] to reassess - Risk: we might lose deals in the interim Option C — Ignore: - This doesn't affect our core users or strategy - Our differentiation is intact - Risk: we're wrong about the impact For each option: what it costs, what it gets us, and when we'd know if it worked.
Make the call. Most competitor moves deserve Option B. Resist the urge to react to every launch.
Regardless of strategic response, your customer-facing teams need talking points now.
Draft competitive response materials: For Sales — Objection handling: - "But [competitor] just launched [feature]" → [response with our differentiation] - Positioning: why we're still the better choice for [our target segment] - What to say about our roadmap without over-promising For Customer Success — Proactive talking points: - For at-risk customers who might be evaluating: [what to say] - For customers who ask about it: [factual comparison without FUD] For Leadership — Assessment brief: - What happened (2 sentences) - Impact assessment (high/medium/low with reasoning) - Recommended response - What we're doing right now
1. **Reacting to every move.** Not every competitor launch warrants a response. If your strategy is sound, most moves are noise. Respond to threats to your core, not distractions. 2. **Copying instead of differentiating.** "They have it so we need it" is the weakest product rationale. Ask: does our user need this? Not: does our competitor have this? 3. **Slow response on talking points.** Even if the strategic response takes weeks, sales and CS need talking points within 24 hours. Arm the team immediately. 4. **FUD in competitive materials.** Never trash the competitor. State facts, highlight your strengths, and let the customer decide. FUD backfires. 5. **Forgetting to follow up.** Set a review date. Was the impact what you predicted? Did the response work? Update your assessment.
AI-native product management skills that move at the speed your team needs. Traditional PM frameworks were built for a world without AI — multi-week discovery sprints, day-long planning offsites, months of analysis before a decision.
Deep dive into product analytics — investigate a question, surface insights, build a data narrative. Use when you need to go beyond dashboards to understand…
Evaluate whether to build in-house, buy a vendor solution, or partner. Use when facing a make-or-buy decision for a capability.
Build a complete business case for a product investment — strategic rationale, financial model, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when you need…
Run a compressed 5-day product discovery cycle. Use when validating whether a problem is worth solving before committing engineering resources.
Define an epic with strategic context, feature breakdown, milestones, and success metrics. Use when scoping a large body of work for planning and tracking.
Design and run lean experiments — hypothesis, cheapest test, success criteria, decision. Use when you need to validate before you build.