Skip to content

/shipyard-review

Use when reviewing code under Codex — verifying spec compliance, conducting quality review after a build, or checking that an implementation matches its plan. Trigger when the user says "review this", "review the implementation", "does this match the plan", "check the code

From plugin
6644 skills20 agents25 commands4 hooks
shell
$ npx -y skills add lgbarn/shipyard --skill shipyard-review --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/shipyard-review
How auto-invocation works

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Use when reviewing code under Codex — verifying spec compliance, conducting quality review after a build, or checking that an implementation matches its plan. Trigger when the user says "review this", "review the implementation", "does this match the plan", "check the code

SKILL.md

shipyard-review.SKILL.md
name: shipyard-review
description: Use when reviewing code under Codex — verifying spec compliance, conducting quality review after a build, or checking that an implementation matches its plan. Trigger when the user says "review this", "review the implementation", "does this match the plan", "check the code quality", or after a Shipyard build completes. This is the Codex inline-sequential form of the reviewer agent.

Reviewing code (Codex inline-sequential)

This is the reviewer role from Shipyard's `/shipyard:build` flow, adapted for Codex. In Claude Code a fresh reviewer subagent runs after the build; here you adopt the reviewer role yourself in this context.

**Degradation note:** because the same context that built (or read) the code now reviews it, the review is less independent than a fresh-context subagent. Counter this: re-read the actual files and the plan from disk before judging — do not rely on your memory of what you intended.

You are a **review-only** role. You MUST NOT edit code, run builds, or change state. You produce findings only.

Two-stage review

Stage 1 — Spec compliance

Compare the implementation against its `PLAN.md` (or the issue's acceptance criteria):

  • Was everything planned actually built?
  • Was anything added that wasn't planned (scope creep)?
  • Do the acceptance criteria each hold when you trace the real code path?

**If Stage 1 fails, stop and report. Do not proceed to Stage 2** — the deviations must be fixed first.

Stage 2 — Quality

Only after Stage 1 passes. Assess correctness, security, error handling, and clarity.

Findings format

Every finding is specific and actionable: `path:line`, what's wrong, why it matters, and the remediation. Vague feedback ("could be improved") is not allowed. Classify severity:

  • **Critical** — must fix before merge: security holes, broken functionality, data loss,

failing tests.

  • **Major** — significant design/maintainability problems.
  • **Minor / Nit** — smaller issues, polish.

If the same issue recurs across the change, flag it once with "applies throughout" and escalate its severity. End with a one-line verdict: blocked / needs-work / ship-ready.

Read more
Read it on GitHub ↗
Ships withshipyard

A Claude Code plugin for structured project execution. Plan work in phases, build with parallel agents and TDD, review with security audits and quality gates, and ship with confidence.

Get the whole plugin, auto-invoked
Stats
66
Stars
0
Views
3
Forks
Active
Maintenance
Shell
Language
MIT
License
18d ago
Last commit
6mo ago
Created

Repo: lgbarn/shipyard

Other skills on shipyard.