audit
On-demand security audit — OWASP, secrets, dependencies, IaC security
On-demand domain research — evaluate technology options, investigate ecosystem choices
> /plugin marketplace add lgbarn/shipyard > /plugin install shipyard@shipyard
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/researchContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
On-demand domain research — evaluate technology options, investigate ecosystem choices
description: "On-demand domain research — evaluate technology options, investigate ecosystem choices" disable-model-invocation: true argument-hint: "<topic> — required: technology choice, domain question, or ecosystem investigation"
You are executing on-demand domain research. Follow these steps precisely.
<prerequisites>
Extract from the command:
If no topic is provided, ask the user what they want to research.
1. Check if `.shipyard/` exists (optional — this command works anywhere). 2. If `.shipyard/config.json` exists, read `model_routing.planning` for model selection. 3. Otherwise, use default model: **sonnet**. 4. Follow **Worktree Protocol** (see `docs/PROTOCOLS.md`) — detect worktree context.
</prerequisites>
<execution>
Assemble context per **Agent Context Protocol** (see `docs/PROTOCOLS.md`):
Dispatch a **researcher agent** (subagent_type: "shipyard:researcher") with:
</execution>
<output>
Display the research document to the user.
Offer follow-up: > "Would you like me to: > - Save this research to `.shipyard/` for future reference > - Create an implementation plan based on the recommendation > - Research a related topic"
</output>
A Claude Code plugin for structured project execution. Plan work in phases, build with parallel agents and TDD, review with security audits and quality gates, and ship with confidence.
Repo: lgbarn/shipyard
On-demand security audit — OWASP, secrets, dependencies, IaC security
Explore requirements through Socratic dialogue and capture project definition
Execute plans using fresh subagents with review gates
Investigate bugs and failures with systematic root-cause analysis