Skip to content
Writing
Skill

/creative-research

Load when a story needs factual grounding the writer doesn't have: historical detail, cultural texture, domain accuracy, or how other authors handled similar material. Pass the question and story context; returns a sourced report the writer can draw from.

From plugin
creative-writing-skills
39435 skills11 agents4 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add haowjy/creative-writing-skills --skill creative-research --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/creative-research

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Load when a story needs factual grounding the writer doesn't have: historical detail, cultural texture, domain accuracy, or how other authors handled similar material. Pass the question and story context; returns a sourced report the writer can draw from.

SKILL.md

creative-research.SKILL.md
name: creative-research
type: reference
description: >
  Load when a story needs factual grounding the writer doesn't have: historical
  detail, cultural texture, domain accuracy, or how other authors handled
  similar material. Pass the question and story context; returns a sourced
  report the writer can draw from.
model-invocable: true

Creative Research

Gather material the writer can use. Evaluate the evidence — source type, reliability, confidence, conflicts — but leave story-fit decisions to the writer.

What to Look For

**Primary sources.** Historical records, period documents, first-person accounts, letters, diaries, court proceedings, field reports. These carry detail and texture that secondary summaries flatten.

**Reference works and published fiction.** Other novels, short stories, and narratives in the genre or period the author is working in. How have other writers handled similar material, settings, or problems?

**History, mythology, and lore.** Real-world events, folklore, cultural traditions, religious texts, oral histories. Look for the specific and surprising over the general and expected.

**Wikis and encyclopedias.** Fandom wikis for existing universes, Wikipedia for cultural and historical grounding, specialized references (weapons, ships, architecture, medicine, botany, legal systems).

**Community discussion.** Writing forums, book reviews, reader reactions, genre convention debates. These surface what readers notice, what they forgive, and what breaks immersion.

**Social media and interviews.** Author craft discussions, writing process threads, reader reception patterns, cultural commentary relevant to the story's setting or themes.

**Domain expertise.** How specific fields actually work — medicine, law, military, sailing, cooking, farming, forensics, finance. The operational details that make fiction feel grounded. Look for practitioner accounts over textbook summaries.

**Place and culture.** Geography, dialects, food, clothing, architecture, daily rhythms, social customs, weather patterns. The sensory and social texture of a setting.

How to Search

Search for current sources over training-data recall. Cultural understanding, historical scholarship, and community consensus shift. Practitioner accounts and experience reports are higher-signal than encyclopedia summaries.

Surface conflicting information. When sources disagree on historical facts, cultural practices, or domain details, present both with citations. The writer needs to know where the record is contested.

Follow the specific. "Medieval weapons" is a starting point; "how a 14th-century English longbowman carried and maintained arrows on campaign" is a finding. The writer needs concrete detail, not category overviews.

Your Report

Structure your report:

  • **Usable detail** — concrete findings organized by topic or question
  • **Source notes** — source type, reliability, and confidence for each finding
  • **Conflicts** — where sources disagree, with both sides cited
  • **Contradictions** — anything that conflicts with what the story currently assumes
  • **Gaps** — what you looked for and couldn't find

Include citations and enough context that the writer can evaluate relevance without re-researching. Your final message is your report.

Read more
Ships withcreative-writing-skills

Write novels, short stories, and serial fiction with AI that maintains your voice, tracks your continuity, and gets better the more you use it.

Get the whole plugin