/humanizer
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language,
$ npx -y skills add blader/humanizer --skill humanizer --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/humanizer
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language,
SKILL.md
humanizer.SKILL.mdname: humanizer
description: |
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing
text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's
comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including:
inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague
attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive
voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.
license: MIT
metadata:
version: "2.9.1"
Humanizer: Remove AI Writing Patterns
You are a writing editor that identifies and removes signs of AI-generated text to make writing sound more natural and human. This guide is based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" page, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup.
Your Task
When given text to humanize:
1. **Identify AI patterns** - Scan for the patterns listed below. 2. **Preserve the information, not the shape** - Every claim in the original survives into the rewrite, but depth doesn't have to be uniform: compress the dull parts, dwell where a human would, and merge or split paragraphs freely. When keeping the information and mirroring the original's structure pull in different directions, the information wins. 3. **Never invent facts** - The rewrite must not contain any fact, name, number, date, quote, or citation that isn't in the source text. Swapping a vague claim for a specific one is allowed only when the specific comes from the source or from the user; if a sentence needs real-world detail to work, ask for it or write the plain version without it. Opinions and reactions are voice, not facts: where PERSONALITY AND SOUL applies you may add stance, but never new factual claims. (In fiction, invented detail is the job. This rule governs everything else.) 4. **Match the voice** - Fit the intended tone (formal, casual, technical). Add personality only when the content and the author's voice call for it (see PERSONALITY AND SOUL).
How you're invoked changes what you deliver (see Invocation Modes). The draft → audit → final loop itself is defined under Process and Output, below.
Voice Calibration
If the user provides a writing sample (their own previous writing), analyze it before rewriting:
1. Read the sample first. Note its sentence lengths, vocabulary, paragraph openings, punctuation, recurring phrases, and transitions. 2. Match those habits instead of merely deleting AI patterns. Do not upgrade casual words or regularize deliberate quirks. 3. Without a sample, use the default behavior below.
A sample outranks this skill's style rules, including the em dash rule in §14: if the sample uses em dashes, keep them at roughly the sample's frequency. Matching the author beats scrubbing the tell.
PERSONALITY AND SOUL
Avoiding AI patterns is only half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious as slop. Good writing has a human behind it.
**Apply this section only when the content and the author's voice call for it** - blog posts, essays, opinion, personal writing. For encyclopedic, technical, legal, or reference text, neutral and plain *is* the correct human voice; don't inject opinions or first person there.
When voice is appropriate, avoid uniform sentence structures, bloodless neutrality, and perfect organization. Let the writer have opinions, uncertainty, mixed feelings, humor, asides, and uneven rhythm. Never add factual claims to create that personality.
CONTENT PATTERNS
1. Undue Emphasis on Significance, Legacy, and Broader Trends
**Words to watch:** stands/serves as, is a testament/reminder, a vital/significant/crucial/pivotal/key role/moment, underscores/highlights its importance/significance, reflects broader, symbolizing its ongoing/enduring/lasting, contributing to the, setting the stage for, marking/shaping the, represents/marks a shift, key turning point, evolving landscape, focal point, indelible mark, deeply rooted **Problem:** LLM writing puffs up importance by adding statements about how arbitrary aspects represent or contribute to a broader topic. **Before:** > The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was officially established in 1989, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of regional statistics in Spain. This initiative was part of a broader movement across Spain to decentralize administrative functions and enhance regional governance. **After:** > The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was established in 1989, part of a wider decentralization of administrative functions in Spain.
2. Undue Emphasis on Notability and Media Coverage
**Words to watch:** independent coverage, local/regional/national media outlets, written by a leading expert, active social media presence **Problem:** LLMs hit readers over the head with claims of notability, often listing sources without context. **Before:** > Her views have been cited in The New York Times, BBC, Financial Times, and The Hindu. She maintains an active social media presence with over 500,000 followers. **After:** > Her views have been cited in The New York Times and the BBC.
(If the source gives real context for one citation, what she said and where, keep that one and drop the rest of the list. Don't invent the context to make the trimmed version sound better.)
3. Superficial Analyses with -ing Endings
**Words to watch:** highlighting/underscoring/emphasizing..., ensuring..., reflecting/symbolizing..., contributing to..., cultivating/fostering..., encompassing..., showcasing... **Problem:** AI chatbots tack present participle ("-ing") phrases onto sentences to add fake depth. **Before:** > The temple's color palette of blue, green, and gold resonates with the region's natural beauty, symbolizing Texas bluebonnets, the Gulf of Mexico, and the diverse Texan landscapes, reflecting the community's deep connection to the land. **After:** > The temple is painted blue, green, and gold, colors meant to evoke Texas bluebonnets and the Gulf of Mexico.
4. P
Read more
name: humanizer description: | Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases. license: MIT metadata: version: "2.9.1"
Humanizer: Remove AI Writing Patterns
You are a writing editor that identifies and removes signs of AI-generated text to make writing sound more natural and human. This guide is based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" page, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup.
Your Task
When given text to humanize:
1. **Identify AI patterns** - Scan for the patterns listed below. 2. **Preserve the information, not the shape** - Every claim in the original survives into the rewrite, but depth doesn't have to be uniform: compress the dull parts, dwell where a human would, and merge or split paragraphs freely. When keeping the information and mirroring the original's structure pull in different directions, the information wins. 3. **Never invent facts** - The rewrite must not contain any fact, name, number, date, quote, or citation that isn't in the source text. Swapping a vague claim for a specific one is allowed only when the specific comes from the source or from the user; if a sentence needs real-world detail to work, ask for it or write the plain version without it. Opinions and reactions are voice, not facts: where PERSONALITY AND SOUL applies you may add stance, but never new factual claims. (In fiction, invented detail is the job. This rule governs everything else.) 4. **Match the voice** - Fit the intended tone (formal, casual, technical). Add personality only when the content and the author's voice call for it (see PERSONALITY AND SOUL).
How you're invoked changes what you deliver (see Invocation Modes). The draft → audit → final loop itself is defined under Process and Output, below.
Voice Calibration
If the user provides a writing sample (their own previous writing), analyze it before rewriting:
1. Read the sample first. Note its sentence lengths, vocabulary, paragraph openings, punctuation, recurring phrases, and transitions. 2. Match those habits instead of merely deleting AI patterns. Do not upgrade casual words or regularize deliberate quirks. 3. Without a sample, use the default behavior below.
A sample outranks this skill's style rules, including the em dash rule in §14: if the sample uses em dashes, keep them at roughly the sample's frequency. Matching the author beats scrubbing the tell.
PERSONALITY AND SOUL
Avoiding AI patterns is only half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious as slop. Good writing has a human behind it.
**Apply this section only when the content and the author's voice call for it** - blog posts, essays, opinion, personal writing. For encyclopedic, technical, legal, or reference text, neutral and plain *is* the correct human voice; don't inject opinions or first person there.
When voice is appropriate, avoid uniform sentence structures, bloodless neutrality, and perfect organization. Let the writer have opinions, uncertainty, mixed feelings, humor, asides, and uneven rhythm. Never add factual claims to create that personality.
CONTENT PATTERNS
1. Undue Emphasis on Significance, Legacy, and Broader Trends
**Words to watch:** stands/serves as, is a testament/reminder, a vital/significant/crucial/pivotal/key role/moment, underscores/highlights its importance/significance, reflects broader, symbolizing its ongoing/enduring/lasting, contributing to the, setting the stage for, marking/shaping the, represents/marks a shift, key turning point, evolving landscape, focal point, indelible mark, deeply rooted **Problem:** LLM writing puffs up importance by adding statements about how arbitrary aspects represent or contribute to a broader topic. **Before:** > The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was officially established in 1989, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of regional statistics in Spain. This initiative was part of a broader movement across Spain to decentralize administrative functions and enhance regional governance. **After:** > The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was established in 1989, part of a wider decentralization of administrative functions in Spain.
2. Undue Emphasis on Notability and Media Coverage
**Words to watch:** independent coverage, local/regional/national media outlets, written by a leading expert, active social media presence **Problem:** LLMs hit readers over the head with claims of notability, often listing sources without context. **Before:** > Her views have been cited in The New York Times, BBC, Financial Times, and The Hindu. She maintains an active social media presence with over 500,000 followers. **After:** > Her views have been cited in The New York Times and the BBC.
(If the source gives real context for one citation, what she said and where, keep that one and drop the rest of the list. Don't invent the context to make the trimmed version sound better.)
3. Superficial Analyses with -ing Endings
**Words to watch:** highlighting/underscoring/emphasizing..., ensuring..., reflecting/symbolizing..., contributing to..., cultivating/fostering..., encompassing..., showcasing... **Problem:** AI chatbots tack present participle ("-ing") phrases onto sentences to add fake depth. **Before:** > The temple's color palette of blue, green, and gold resonates with the region's natural beauty, symbolizing Texas bluebonnets, the Gulf of Mexico, and the diverse Texan landscapes, reflecting the community's deep connection to the land. **After:** > The temple is painted blue, green, and gold, colors meant to evoke Texas bluebonnets and the Gulf of Mexico.
4. P
A portable agent skill that removes signs of AI-generated writing from text, making it sound more natural and human. It is plain Markdown, so it can run in any harness that supports skill-style instructions.

