acquisition-channel-ad…
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Create a Geoffrey Moore-style positioning statement. Use when clarifying who you serve, what problem you solve, your category, and why you're different from alternatives.
$ npx -y skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills --skill positioning-statement --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/positioning-statementContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Create a Geoffrey Moore-style positioning statement. Use when clarifying who you serve, what problem you solve, your category, and why you're different from alternatives.
name: positioning-statement argument-hint: "[product] [target customer]" description: Create a Geoffrey Moore-style positioning statement. Use when clarifying who you serve, what problem you solve, your category, and why you're different from alternatives. intent: >- Create a Geoffrey Moore-style positioning statement that clearly articulates who your product serves, what need it addresses, how it's categorized, what benefit it delivers, and how it differs from alternatives. Use this when you need to align stakeholders on product strategy, guide messaging, or test if your value proposition is crisp and defensible. type: component theme: strategy-positioning best_for: - "Defining your product's market position clearly for the first time" - "Differentiating from specific competitors in your messaging" - "Aligning your team on who you serve, what problem you solve, and why you're different" scenarios: - "I need to write a positioning statement for a new B2B SaaS product targeting mid-market HR teams" - "Our positioning feels generic and I need to sharpen it against two specific competitors" estimated_time: "10-15 min"
Create a Geoffrey Moore-style positioning statement that clearly articulates who your product serves, what need it addresses, how it's categorized, what benefit it delivers, and how it differs from alternatives. Use this when you need to align stakeholders on product strategy, guide messaging, or test if your value proposition is crisp and defensible.
This is not a tagline or elevator pitch—it's a strategic clarity tool that forces you to make hard choices about target, need, and differentiation.
**Works best with:** The product and its target customer. **Also useful:** The unmet need, product category, primary benefit, and nearest alternative — the skill drafts from what you give and asks only for what's missing.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.
**Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** The skill asks for product and target customer first, then works through the Moore template slots.
**Example invocation:** `Positioning statement for LaunchDarkly-style feature flags aimed at platform engineering leads at 200+ eng orgs.`
From *Crossing the Chasm*, Moore's framework splits positioning into two parts:
**Value Proposition:**
**Differentiation Statement:**
---
Use `template.md` for the full fill-in structure.
Before drafting, ensure you have:
**If missing context:** Use discovery interviews, market research, or customer interviews to fill gaps. Don't guess.
---
Fill in the template:
## Value Proposition **For** [specific target customer/persona] - **that need** [statement of underserved need—focus on pains, gains, JTBD] - [product or service name] - **is a** [product category] - **that** [benefit statement—focus on outcomes, not features]
**Quality checks:**
---
Fill in the template:
## Differentiation Statement - **Unlike** [primary competitor or competitive alternative] - [product or service name] - **provides** [unique differentiation—outcomes, not features]
**Quality checks:**
77 battle-tested PM frameworks, ready for Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, and any agent that can read structured knowledge.
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead…
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
Map evidence-backed growth options across the Ansoff Matrix with risk-rated sequencing. Use when the question is where the next tranche of growth comes from,…
The protocol behind every investigation skill. Use when AI research must proceed without you: search-plan gate, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, confidence…