acquisition-channel-ad…
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Plan a VP or CPO 30-60-90 day diagnostic onboarding path. Use when entering a new executive product role and avoiding premature change.
$ npx -y skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills --skill executive-onboarding-playbook --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/executive-onboarding-playbookContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Plan a VP or CPO 30-60-90 day diagnostic onboarding path. Use when entering a new executive product role and avoiding premature change.
name: executive-onboarding-playbook argument-hint: "[role and company context]" description: Plan a VP or CPO 30-60-90 day diagnostic onboarding path. Use when entering a new executive product role and avoiding premature change. intent: >- Structure the first 90 days of a VP or CPO transition as a diagnostic process, not an execution sprint. The single most common failure in senior product leadership transitions is acting before understanding — changing structures, replacing people, or announcing strategy before building the evidence base that makes those decisions defensible. type: workflow theme: career-leadership best_for: - "Starting a new VP or CPO role in the first 90 days" - "Evaluating a CPO offer — what to ask before you accept" - "Diagnosing an organization you've just inherited" scenarios: - "I just accepted a VP of Product role starting next month — help me plan my first 90 days" - "I'm evaluating a CPO offer and want to know what questions to ask the hiring CEO" - "I'm two months into a new role and want to validate what I've learned before I start acting" estimated_time: "20-30 min"
Structure the first 90 days of a VP or CPO transition as a diagnostic process, not an execution sprint. The single most common failure in senior product leadership transitions is acting before understanding — changing structures, replacing people, or announcing strategy before building the evidence base that makes those decisions defensible.
This playbook runs in three phases: **Diagnose** (Month 1), **Validate** (Month 2), **Act with Evidence** (Month 3). Each phase builds on the last. Skipping phases doesn't accelerate results — it guarantees expensive reversals.
This is not a 100-day plan for impressing your new boss. It's a diagnostic protocol for making durable decisions.
**Works best with:** The role you're stepping into (VP or CPO) and basic company context — size, stage, how the product org is set up. **Also useful:** How far you are from Day 1 (offer stage, pre-start, week 3), known landmines, and what the CEO says success looks like.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.
**Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** The playbook opens by asking your start date and company context, then anchors you in the right phase.
**Example invocation:** `I start as VP Product at a 300-person Series C in 3 weeks — first product exec hire, founder currently runs product. Build my 30-60-90.`
Enter every new VP/CPO role as if you're an external consultant hired to assess the organization — before you're the person responsible for changing it.
What this means in practice:
Negotiate this upfront: tell your boss and peers that Month 1 is explicitly a learning phase. Set the expectation that your first major recommendations will come in Month 2. Executives who've been through transitions will respect this; executives who want action in Week 1 are a signal worth noting.
---
At VP and CPO level, significant strategy is never fully written down. It lives in:
This isn't dysfunction — it's how every organization works at the executive level. Treating written strategy as complete strategy will get you into trouble fast.
Your job in the first 90 days is to surface the unwritten layer. How:
---
Every significant decision you make in Month 3 and beyond should rest on a body of evidence collected in Months 1 and 2. This means:
The body of evidence is what separates confident decisions from guesses. It's also what makes hard decisions defensible — to your team, to your peers, and to the board.
---
Two distinct people situations require different responses:
**Diamonds in the rough** — Capable, undervalued people who haven't had a champion. They exist in almost every organization. You'll find them in Months 1-2 by listening for: "She's really talented but nobody gives her the hard problems" or noticing who gives
77 battle-tested PM frameworks, ready for Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, and any agent that can read structured knowledge.
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead…
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
Map evidence-backed growth options across the Ansoff Matrix with risk-rated sequencing. Use when the question is where the next tranche of growth comes from,…
The protocol behind every investigation skill. Use when AI research must proceed without you: search-plan gate, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, confidence…