acquisition-channel-ad…
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Identify what to measure, test, or track to de-risk a product or AI idea. Use when stress-testing an idea across internal (DUFV) and external (PESTEL) dimensions.
$ npx -y skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills --skill derisk-measurement-advisor --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/derisk-measurement-advisorContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Identify what to measure, test, or track to de-risk a product or AI idea. Use when stress-testing an idea across internal (DUFV) and external (PESTEL) dimensions.
name: derisk-measurement-advisor argument-hint: "[product or AI idea]" description: Identify what to measure, test, or track to de-risk a product or AI idea. Use when stress-testing an idea across internal (DUFV) and external (PESTEL) dimensions. intent: >- Guide product managers through a structured risk scan across **10 dimensions** — 4 internal (Desirability, Usability, Feasibility, Viability) and 6 external (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) — to identify the most important things to measure, test, or track before committing to a product or AI idea. Each surfaced risk gets triaged into **act on immediately** or **start tracking**, producing a prioritized risk register with concrete next steps. type: interactive best_for: - "Stress-testing an AI or product idea before putting it on the roadmap" - "Identifying the cheapest tests to run before committing teams and budget" - "Scanning for external forces that could blindside your product plans" - "Building a risk register with clear act-now vs. watch-and-track priorities" scenarios: - "I have an AI product idea. What should I measure before we commit?" - "Help me figure out what risks to act on now vs. track over time" - "We're about to put this on the roadmap. What could go wrong internally and externally?" - "Is this idea worth the squeeze? What should we test first?" estimated_time: "15-20 min" theme: validation-experiments
Guide product managers through identifying the most important things to measure, test, or track across 10 risk dimensions — 4 internal and 6 external — then triage each into **act on immediately** or **start tracking**. The output is a prioritized risk register that tells you what to do first, not just what could go wrong.
This is not a generic risk list. It's a guided scan tied to *your* specific product, customer, and market context. The question it answers: **is the orange worth the squeeze?**
**Works best with:** The product or AI idea you want to stress-test. **Also useful:** Its stage (concept, prototype, in-market), what you've already validated, and any dimensions you already know are risky.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.
**Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** The advisor opens by asking for the idea in a sentence or two, then scans the 10 risk dimensions against it.
**Example invocation:** `De-risk this: an AI agent that auto-drafts insurance claim responses for adjusters — prototype stage, no compliance review yet.`
Every product idea carries two kinds of risk. Most PMs check one and ignore the other.
**Internal risks** ask whether the product itself will work:
**External risks** ask whether the world will let it work:
The single triage question that applies to both sides: **Do I act on this now, or start tracking it?**
---
Adapted from Marty Cagan's four product risks, split into two measurement categories:
| Category | Dimension | Core Question | |----------|-----------|---------------| | **Product Outcome Metrics** | Desirability | Will customers value it enough to buy it? | | **Product Outcome Metrics** | Usability | Will customers figure out how to use it? | | **Business Outcome Metrics** | Feasibility | Can we build it? Can we sustain it at scale? | | **Business Outcome Metrics** | Viability | Will it work as a viable business? |
**Product Outcome Metrics** answer: *What's in it for the customer/user?* They measure whether the product is solving meaningful problems and delivering value to its intended users.
**Business Outcome Metrics** answer: *What's in it for our business/organization?* They measure how effectively and reliably the product supports a seamless customer experience while remaining feasible to deliver.
The connection to positioning: Product Outcome Metrics validate your **Problem Positioning Statement** (the customer promise). Business Outcome Metrics validate your **Problem Framing Statement** (the business case).
---
Six categories of forces outside your organization that can reshape, delay, or kill your product plans:
| Category | What It Covers | Example Risk | |----------|---------------|--------------| | **Political** | Government policies, trade regulations, political priorities | New AI safety rules for state contractors | | **Economic** | Market conditions, funding, inequality, supply chains | VC AI funding dries up — focus shifts to profitability | | **Social** | Demographics, sentiment, digital literacy, cultural shifts | AI accused of bias — can you prove fairness? | | **Technological** | Platform dependencies, standards, competing tech | New AI model outdates yours — time for rapid innovation? | | **Environmental** | Energy consumption, sustainability, carbon footprint | AI criticized for carbon footprint — how to go green? | | **Legal** | Data privacy, compliance, IP, evolving regulations | AI deepfakes lawsuit crossfire — can you protect your product? |
**Key insight from the classroom:** Market conditions don't just change — they potentially change us, our business, and our products. PESTEL helps PMs categorize and respond to that change, not just observe it.
---
Every surfaced risk gets one of two labels:
77 battle-tested PM frameworks, ready for Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, and any agent that can read structured knowledge.
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead…
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
Map evidence-backed growth options across the Ansoff Matrix with risk-rated sequencing. Use when the question is where the next tranche of growth comes from,…
The protocol behind every investigation skill. Use when AI research must proceed without you: search-plan gate, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, confidence…