audit
Use when someone asks for an AIOS audit, asks to score their setup against the Four Cs, or says "is my AIOS working" / "audit my setup" / "find gaps in my…
Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop",
$ npx -y skills add alirezarezvani/gaios --skill experiment --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/experimentContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop",
name: experiment description: Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop", "autoresearch X", "tune/optimize X against a metric", "hill-climb X". Follows references/sops/experiment-loop.md. Enforces the autonomy gate (objective metric + reversible sandbox + no PHI/external) before any unsupervised looping.
Hill-climb a measurable artifact: **try → measure → keep-or-revert → log**, on a branch, with a trail. Full procedure: `references/sops/experiment-loop.md`. Existing examples + use-case cards: `experiments/`.
Before looping unsupervised, confirm **all three**: 1. **Objective, cheap, automatable metric** (code computes it in seconds–minutes). 2. **Reversible sandbox** (git branch / throwaway data / `.tmp`). 3. **No PHI, no confidential data, no external send, no prod deploy.**
If any fails → **human-in-the-loop**: propose each change, get approval, no overnight run. Regulated/production outcomes feed the human-reviewed change process — never auto-deploy. This is `CLAUDE.md`'s scale-caution-to-stakes rule.
1. Pick or write the experiment's `CARD.md` (objective, metric+direction, the one mutable surface, budget, autonomy, owner). New ones can copy `experiments/forecast-tuning/`. 2. `git checkout -b experiments/<tag>`. 3. Baseline run → `tools/experiment_log.py add <results.tsv> --id ... --metric ... --status keep --note baseline`. 4. Loop: edit the **one** mutable surface → run the **read-only** harness → log → keep (commit) if improved, else `git reset`. Simpler-and-equal = keep. 5. Stop on interrupt or the budget. Hand the winner + trail to the human.
Clone it, run /setup, and it becomes yours in Claude Code or Codex — a second brain + Chief of Staff that holds your context, structures your work, drafts in your voice, and runs reliable workflows.
Use when someone asks for an AIOS audit, asks to score their setup against the Four Cs, or says "is my AIOS working" / "audit my setup" / "find gaps in my…
Use at the start of a working day (or when the user asks "what should I focus on today / give me my brief / daily standup"). Produces a one-screen daily brief…
Use when the user faces a real decision with stakes and wants it framed cleanly — options, ranked criteria, a recommendation, the falsifier, and reversibility…
Template skill for a leadership-transition / executive cockpit — when someone steps into or covers a leadership role and needs to not drop anything. Produces a…
Use when the user brings an external source worth keeping — a URL, a paper, a tweet/thread, a blog post, a docs page — and wants it pulled into the second…
Use when the user asks a question about how things in the codebase or wiki relate — what connects two things, how something works end to end, what depends on…