Skip to content
Development
Skill

/prompt-evaluation-runner

Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost controls.

From plugin
agent-powerups
6113 skills46 agents54 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill prompt-evaluation-runner --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/prompt-evaluation-runner

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost controls.

SKILL.md

prompt-evaluation-runner.SKILL.md
name: prompt-evaluation-runner
description: Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost controls.

Prompt Evaluation Runner

When to use

Use when you need to evaluate an LLM app, test a prompt systematically, or run red-team/vulnerability scans against a target model or application.

Requirements / Checks

1. Check if an evaluation tool is defined in project deps, scripts, lockfiles, or local toolchain (e.g., `promptfoo`, `evals`, `braintrust`). 2. Do not run unvetted remote runners without checking the project's toolchain first (e.g., avoid `npx promptfoo@latest` if `promptfoo` is already installed locally). 3. If no runner exists, ask before adding a dev dependency or using an ephemeral runner. 4. Confirm expected cost, provider, API keys, and network target before any execution.

Workflow

1. **Define risk** — state target behavior, failure mode, provider(s), and budget limits before writing any config.

2. **Choose assertions** — prefer deterministic checks first:

| Assertion type | When to use | |---|---| | `contains` / `not-contains` | Output must include/exclude specific text | | `regex` | Structured output pattern (e.g., JSON key present) | | `json-schema` | Output must conform to a schema | | `cost` | Must stay under a token/dollar budget | | `latency` | Must respond within N ms | | `javascript` / `python` | Custom logic when simpler types don't fit | | Model grader | Last resort — only for subjective quality checks |

3. **Use model graders sparingly** — pin the grader model and provider explicitly; document the cost and non-determinism risk.

4. **Minimal config structure**:

   description: "Test that the summarizer stays under 200 words"
   providers:
     - id: openai:gpt-4o-mini
       config:
         temperature: 0
   prompts:
     - "Summarize: {{input}}"
   defaultTest:
     assert:
       - type: javascript
         value: output.split(' ').length < 200
   tests:
     - vars:
         input: "{{env.TEST_DOCUMENT}}"

5. **Handle env safely** — use `{{env.VAR_NAME}}` for all secrets and inputs. Never hardcode API keys or sensitive data in config files.

6. **Execute locally** — run the smallest suite first. Ask before running long, paid, red-team, or production-targeted suites.

7. **Analyze failures** — classify before fixing:

  • Prompt failure (model output is wrong)
  • Provider variance (non-deterministic model)
  • Flaky grader (model grader is inconsistent)
  • Bad fixture (test input is unrealistic)
  • Config mistake (assertion logic error)

Safety Constraints

  • Do NOT log, echo, or store API keys in configuration files or chat output.
  • Do NOT run evaluations against production endpoints without user consent.
  • Do not execute arbitrary remote code or unvetted plugins during evaluation.

Validation / Done Criteria

  • Eval config is valid, minimal, and uses `{{env.VAR}}` references for secrets.
  • Deterministic assertions exist where possible; model grader use is documented and justified.
  • Run scope, provider, and estimated cost are reported before execution.
  • Results are summarized without leaking sensitive input data.

References

  • `references/eval-config-patterns.md`
Read more
Ships withagent-powerups

Curated power-ups for coding agents: skills, slash commands, MCP configs, hooks, AGENTS.md templates, and workflows for serious software engineering. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Cursor and more

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on agent-powerups.