Skip to content
Development
Skill

/model-routing

Use when selecting a model for a new task or subagent, deciding whether to escalate after a failed attempt, or designing a multi-agent pipeline with mixed task complexity.

From plugin
agent-powerups
6113 skills46 agents54 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill model-routing --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/model-routing

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Use when selecting a model for a new task or subagent, deciding whether to escalate after a failed attempt, or designing a multi-agent pipeline with mixed task complexity.

SKILL.md

model-routing.SKILL.md
name: model-routing
description: Use when selecting a model for a new task or subagent, deciding whether to escalate after a failed attempt, or designing a multi-agent pipeline with mixed task complexity.

Model Routing

Choose the right model tier before starting a task. Overusing a capable model wastes cost and context. Underusing it produces lower quality on complex work.

When to Use

  • Selecting a model for a new task or subagent
  • Deciding whether to escalate after a failed attempt
  • Designing a multi-agent pipeline with mixed task complexity

Tier Definitions (vendor-neutral)

| Tier | Typical examples | Task profile | |------|-----------------|--------------| | **Fast** | Haiku, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini Flash | Mechanical, deterministic, narrow | | **Standard** | Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro | General implementation and review | | **Deep** | Opus, o1, Gemini Ultra | Architecture, security, root-cause, release |

Use your provider's current recommended model for each tier. Do not hard-code model IDs in documentation or scripts; reference tiers instead.

Routing Table

Fast tier

Use when ALL of:

  • Single file or single operation
  • Output is deterministic (rename, format, classify, generate boilerplate)
  • No ambiguity in the task description
  • Low blast radius on failure (easy to retry or revert)

Examples: rename a variable, convert a data format, generate a changelog entry, classify issue severity.

Standard tier

Use when ANY of:

  • Multi-file change with known scope
  • Standard implementation task (add a feature, fix a bug, write tests)
  • Code review of a bounded change
  • Refactor with clear before/after contract

This is the **default**. When unsure, use Standard.

Deep tier

Use when ANY of:

  • Architecture or system design decision
  • Security audit or threat model
  • Root-cause analysis with no clear reproduction
  • Pre-release verification across a large surface
  • Task requires reasoning across many files simultaneously
  • Two Standard attempts failed with no clear progress

Do not use Deep speculatively. It is expensive and slower.

Escalation Rule

**Try Standard first.** Escalate to Deep only after Standard fails with a clear reasoning gap — not just a wrong answer. A wrong answer from Standard often means the task needs more context, not a more capable model.

Do not escalate because of anxiety about getting it right. Escalate because the attempt revealed a complexity that a smaller model cannot handle.

Session Discipline

  • Start a new session after a major phase transition (research → implement → test)
  • Compact context after finishing research before starting implementation
  • Do not carry debugging traces into an implementation session
  • Short-lived subagents default to Fast or Standard depending on task type

Cost Tracking

Record per task:

  • Tier used
  • Approximate token count
  • Number of retries
  • Success/escalated/failed

Use this to calibrate your routing decisions over time. If Standard succeeds > 90% of the time on a task type, that task does not need Deep.

Anti-Patterns

  • **Pre-escalation**: Using Deep on a task that hasn't been tried at Standard
  • **Anxiety escalation**: Using Deep because the task feels important, not because it's complex
  • **Under-routing**: Using Fast for a multi-file refactor and then retrying three times
  • **Model pinning**: Hard-coding specific model IDs in configs instead of tier references

Verification

  • [ ] Tier was chosen from the routing table before the task started — Standard by default when unsure
  • [ ] Deep was used only for a listed Deep criterion or after a Standard attempt exposed a reasoning gap
  • [ ] No specific model IDs were hard-coded — tier references only
  • [ ] Tier, retries, and outcome were recorded for future calibration
Read more
Ships withagent-powerups

Curated power-ups for coding agents: skills, slash commands, MCP configs, hooks, AGENTS.md templates, and workflows for serious software engineering. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Cursor and more

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on agent-powerups.