prompt-evaluation-runn…
Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost…
Use when a bug fix or complex debugging session concludes and a blameless post-mortem summary is needed for human review.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill incident-readout -a windsurf -y
name: incident-readout description: Use when a bug fix or complex debugging session concludes and a blameless post-mortem summary is needed for human review.
When a complex debugging session ends, produce an incident readout. This prevents knowledge loss and helps humans review the fix quickly. Keep it blameless: causes and prevention, not people.
1. **Reconstruct the facts from history** — pull them from the repo rather than recalling them:
git log --oneline -10 # the fix commits git show <fix-commit> --stat # what the fix touched gh pr view <number> --json title,body,comments # if a PR exists
2. **Fill the readout structure.** Output an incident readout document (or print to terminal) using this structure:
### 1. The Symptom What was reported? (1-2 sentences) ### 2. The Root Cause What was the actual underlying technical reason for the failure? Be highly specific about the exact line of code, assumption, or state that failed. ### 3. The Fix What did we change to fix it? Provide a high-level summary of the structural change, not just a diff. ### 4. Prevention How do we ensure this never happens again? (e.g., "Added test case X", "Refactored module Y to be strongly typed").
Curated power-ups for coding agents: skills, slash commands, MCP configs, hooks, AGENTS.md templates, and workflows for serious software engineering. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Cursor and more
Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost…
Use when creating or reviewing red-team eval plugins, attack templates, grader rubrics, safety fixtures, or model-risk test…
Use when designing, running, debugging, or hardening deterministic eval suites for agent skills, prompts, tool workflows, or…
Use when designing tool definitions for a new agent or subagent, an agent shows high retry rates, ambiguous tool invocations, or…
Use when routing a prompt to a local provider CLI for a second opinion, review, or plan -- you are about to call a provider…
Use when starting work in an unfamiliar area of a codebase, spawning a subagent that needs targeted file context, a first search…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.