brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent,…
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
$ npx -y skills add xintaofei/codeg --skill finishing-a-development-branch --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/finishing-a-development-branchContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
name: finishing-a-development-branch description: Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
**Core principle:** Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Run the project's full test suite (`npm test` / `cargo test` / `pytest` / `go test ./...`).
**If tests fail**, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing: [Show failures]
**If tests pass:** continue to Step 2.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) # Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory # before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup | |-------|------|---------| | `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (normal repo) | Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up | | `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, named branch | Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) | | `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, detached HEAD | Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed — leave in place |
The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
**Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:**
Implementation complete. What would you like to do? 1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally 2. Push and create a Pull Request 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) Which option?
**Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:**
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace). 1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request 2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later) Which option?
Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.
# Get main repo root for CWD safety MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" # Merge first — verify success before removing anything git checkout <base-branch> git pull git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command>
If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.
Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:
git branch -d <feature-branch>
git push -u origin <feature-branch> # From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote: # git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>
Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.
Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."
This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:
This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <commit-list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:
git branch -D <feature-branch>
**Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards.** Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the `GIT_DIR`/`GIT_COMMON`/`WORKTREE_PATH` values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.
**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`:** Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
**If `WORKTREE_PATH` is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH" git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
**If removal is refused** (`contains modified or untracked files`): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never `--force` on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:
git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
Worktree removal refused — these files were never committed: <file list> 1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup 2. Move them into <main repo root> 3. Delete them (unrecoverable) Which?
Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.
**Otherwise:** The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-----
English | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Español | Deutsch | Français | Português | العربية Codeg (Code Generation) is a multi-agent coding workspace: run every AI coding agent in one place — and let them work together.
Repo: xintaofei/codeg
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent,…
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical…
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session