analyze-performance
Use when user has been posting on LinkedIn at least 4 weeks and wants to know what is landing, run a quarterly content review, or diagnose dropping engagement.…
Use when user has one piece of existing content (podcast or video transcript, blog post, internal doc, talk, older LinkedIn post that performed, long email) and wants multiple LinkedIn-shaped pieces from different angles. Trigger phrases include "repurpose this," "turn this into
$ npx -y skills add warpirate/linkedin-maxxing --skill repurpose-content --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/repurpose-contentContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when user has one piece of existing content (podcast or video transcript, blog post, internal doc, talk, older LinkedIn post that performed, long email) and wants multiple LinkedIn-shaped pieces from different angles. Trigger phrases include "repurpose this," "turn this into
name: repurpose-content description: | Use when user has one piece of existing content (podcast or video transcript, blog post, internal doc, talk, older LinkedIn post that performed, long email) and wants multiple LinkedIn-shaped pieces from different angles. Trigger phrases include "repurpose this," "turn this into LinkedIn posts," "give me 5 posts from this article," "I have a transcript I want to use," or when user uploads a long-form file and asks how to use it on LinkedIn. license: MIT
One strong piece of source content can become five to ten LinkedIn posts, each from a different angle, because long-form material almost always contains multiple distinct ideas the original author treated as one. This skill exists to find those distinct ideas and shape each into something LinkedIn-sized, in the user's voice, without producing variations on the same thing.
Most LinkedIn AI tools that claim "repurposing" just rewrite the source into a shorter version, then rewrite it again with different phrasing. The result is five posts that say the same thing five ways. They cannibalize each other and bore the audience.
Real repurposing finds the different claims, examples, and moments inside the source and shapes each one into its own LinkedIn-native piece. A talk has multiple beats; each beat can be its own post. A blog post has a main argument and several supporting points; the supporting points can be standalone posts. A podcast transcript has the speaker saying surprising things at specific moments; those moments become posts.
The test: if two of the repurposed pieces could be confused for each other, the repurposing failed.
Trigger when:
Do NOT trigger when:
The source content. Either pasted into chat, uploaded as a file, or linked (the user needs to paste the text since URLs often will not fetch). Plus:
1. What is the source? (talk, blog, podcast, internal doc, old post) 2. How many pieces do they want? (Default: 3-5. Cap at 7. More than 7 from one source tends to dilute.) 3. What formats are open? (Posts, carousels, video scripts, or only text posts.)
If voice-profile.md exists, read it.
A good repurposing pass has three steps:
**1. Read the source for distinct ideas.** A 30-minute talk has roughly 4-8 distinct beats. A 1,500-word blog post has 3-5. A podcast episode usually has 5-10 "moments" (a surprising claim, a specific story, a turn of phrase). The first job is to identify these without summarizing the whole.
**2. For each distinct idea, identify its anchor.** What is the specific moment, quote, number, or detail from the source that makes this idea LinkedIn-postable? If you cannot point to a specific anchor in the source, the idea is too generic.
**3. Choose a format and an angle.** Each piece gets:
The output of this skill is essentially a batch of find-ideas seeds, each derived from the source, ready to be sent to the appropriate writing skill.
Source: [type and brief description] Pieces produced: [N] --- Piece 1: [format]. [one-line angle] Source anchor: [the specific line, quote, moment, or detail from the source that grounds this piece] Why this angle: [one sentence on what makes it postable] Best fit for: [write-post / build-carousel / write-video-script / write-longform] --- Piece 2: [format]. [one-line angle] Source anchor: ... [continue for each piece] --- Suggested cadence: [if relevant: how to space the pieces over time so they do not feel like a barrage from one source]
Output must read as written by a human on the first pass. The constraints below are how you write, not a checklist to apply later. Do not narrate this process to the user. Do not show a "before humanizer / after humanizer" sequence. Just produce clean output.
**Hard bans — never appear in output:**
17 Claude Code skills + slash commands for substance-first LinkedIn growth. Profile audit, content drafting (posts, carousels, longform, video, DMs, comments), performance analysis, and a Wikipedia-based humanizer. Anti-template, anti-slop, open source, MIT.
Use when user has been posting on LinkedIn at least 4 weeks and wants to know what is landing, run a quarterly content review, or diagnose dropping engagement.…
Use when user wants to diagnose their current LinkedIn profile before rewriting it: they have not touched it in a while, get few profile views or recruiter…
Use when user has an idea with multiple discrete steps, a framework, a comparison, a before/after, a list of items worth a slide each, or anything where…
Use when user wants to post on LinkedIn but has no concrete idea, has a vague topic that needs a sharper angle, or uploads a work artifact (PR description,…
Use when editing or reviewing text that reads as AI-generated: symptoms include em dashes, "it's not X, it's Y" constructions, AI vocabulary (leverage, delve,…
Use when user wants to think strategically about LinkedIn content rather than post-by-post: starting a LinkedIn presence from scratch, posting feels scattered…