/wrong
Reset and re-evaluate when current approach isn't working. Use when user says "wrong", "this isn't working", "wrong approach", "start over", "try again", "bad direction", or when the current solution path has hit a dead end and needs a fresh perspective.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add umputun/cc-thingz --skill wrong -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
wrong.SKILL.mdname: wrong
description: Reset and re-evaluate when current approach isn't working. Use when user says "wrong", "this isn't working", "wrong approach", "start over", "try again", "bad direction", or when the current solution path has hit a dead end and needs a fresh perspective.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, EnterPlanMode, AskUserQuestion
Wrong — Reset and Re-evaluate
The current approach isn't working as expected. Step back and re-examine the problem from the beginning.
Workflow
Step 1: Re-analyze the Core Problem
State the problem in clear, simple terms. What exactly are we trying to solve?
Step 2: Identify Missing Context
Determine what additional information is needed about:
- The existing codebase and its patterns
- Performance requirements or constraints
- Integration points with other systems
- Expected usage patterns or scale
- Any domain-specific requirements not yet mentioned
Step 3: Propose Fresh Approaches
Suggest 2-3 alternative solutions that:
- Follow project best practices and idioms
- Match the existing code's style and architecture patterns
- Are maintainable and testable
- Solve the exact problem without over-engineering
- Don't use shortcuts or hacks
Step 4: Explain Trade-offs
For each proposed approach, briefly explain:
- Why this approach fits the problem
- What the main benefits and drawbacks are
- How it integrates with the existing codebase
Step 5: Recommend the Best Path Forward
Which approach is most appropriate and why?
Requirements
- Solution must be production-ready, not a proof of concept
- Code should be idiomatic and follow established patterns
- Include comprehensive tests with edge cases
- Provide complete, runnable code with no placeholders
- Ensure the solution is maintainable
**Ask clarifying questions before proceeding.**
Read more
name: wrong description: Reset and re-evaluate when current approach isn't working. Use when user says "wrong", "this isn't working", "wrong approach", "start over", "try again", "bad direction", or when the current solution path has hit a dead end and needs a fresh perspective. allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, EnterPlanMode, AskUserQuestion
Wrong — Reset and Re-evaluate
The current approach isn't working as expected. Step back and re-examine the problem from the beginning.
Workflow
Step 1: Re-analyze the Core Problem
State the problem in clear, simple terms. What exactly are we trying to solve?
Step 2: Identify Missing Context
Determine what additional information is needed about:
- The existing codebase and its patterns
- Performance requirements or constraints
- Integration points with other systems
- Expected usage patterns or scale
- Any domain-specific requirements not yet mentioned
Step 3: Propose Fresh Approaches
Suggest 2-3 alternative solutions that:
- Follow project best practices and idioms
- Match the existing code's style and architecture patterns
- Are maintainable and testable
- Solve the exact problem without over-engineering
- Don't use shortcuts or hacks
Step 4: Explain Trade-offs
For each proposed approach, briefly explain:
- Why this approach fits the problem
- What the main benefits and drawbacks are
- How it integrates with the existing codebase
Step 5: Recommend the Best Path Forward
Which approach is most appropriate and why?
Requirements
- Solution must be production-ready, not a proof of concept
- Code should be idiomatic and follow established patterns
- Include comprehensive tests with edge cases
- Provide complete, runnable code with no placeholders
- Ensure the solution is maintainable
**Ask clarifying questions before proceeding.**
Things to make Claude Code even better — hooks, skills, and commands, organized as a marketplace of independent plugins. This is an unapologetically opinionated set.
Other skills on cc-thingz.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about wrong.
- Which coding agents can use wrong?
- wrong installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

