/weekly-reverse-review

name: weekly-reverse-review
description: "Reverse weekly review for turning inbox noise, daily plans, diaries, calendars, annual plans, and long-range life plans into one happiness-and-peace-centered weekly plan. Use when the user asks for 週檢視, 反向週計劃, 8 Big Rocks, Inbox Zero weekly review, 幸福寧靜週, or wants to synthesize Todoist/inbox notes, daily diaries, calendars, yearly plans, and life plans into iMandalArt/FIRE/JSON outputs."

Weekly Reverse Review

Purpose

Turn one week of evidence into the next week's meaningful plan by asking:

`Is this making me prove myself, or bringing real happiness and peace?`

This skill is a reverse planning skill. It does not start by adding tasks. It first gathers evidence from life, removes noise, checks long-range meaning, then produces a compact weekly plan.

Core Principle

Use the center phrase `幸福寧靜週` unless the user gives another five-Han-character center.

Default final question:

`那件事情能帶來真正的幸福與寧靜？`

Default operating sentence:

`少說，陪伴，慢慢做。`

Inputs

Gather only the sources available in the user request or local context:

• Inbox or Todoist export: loose tasks, reminders, and noise.
• Daily plan / diary / calendar: what actually happened.
• Year plan / hundred-year life plan: long-range meaning and values.
• Existing weekly plan: user's human-made 8 Big Rocks.
• Photos, social posts, TheBrain, AIDA, or other record stores when provided.

When source files are present, read them before synthesizing.

Skill Connections

Use these skills when available and relevant:

• `fire-analysis-card`: semantic analysis, numbering, index, route, evolution.
• `imandalart`: final 2.01 hard-line weekly 3x3 card.
• `todays-daily-plan`: daily plan and diary extraction.
• `markdown-nine-grid-clipboard`: Markdown table version of the weekly card.
• `project-note-json-to-epub`: publishing-ready project-note JSON when weekly reviews become manuscript material.
• Calendar skills or apps: calendar evidence, not planning fantasy.

Workflow

1. **Collect evidence**

• Inbox: what is asking for attention?
• Diary/calendar: what actually happened?
• Year/life plan: what matters over a longer arc?
• Existing weekly plan: what the human brain already chose.

2. **Detect imbalance**

• Identify the strongest domain.
• Identify domains being swallowed by the strongest domain.
• Health, leisure, and finance often need explicit minimum actions.

3. **Reverse-check motives**

• Is this for proving myself?
• Is this for real happiness and peace?
• Does this support family, friendship, service, health, or meaningful work?
• What should be deleted, delayed, delegated, or downgraded?

4. **Choose weekly rocks**

• Keep eight domains, but make each domain evidence-backed.
• Give every weak domain a minimum viable action.
• Convert people meetings into `person / theme / next step` cards.
• Convert writing progress into at most three manuscript cards.

5. **Produce outputs**

• Short recommendation.
• FIRE-style semantic summary when requested or when enough evidence exists.
• iMandalArt weekly card in the fixed weekly layout.
• Optional JSON using `references/output-json-schema.md`.

Fixed Weekly Layout

When generating iMandalArt weekly plans, use the user's weekly-domain layout, not the default process layout:

Ⓕ內在　Ⓒ財流　Ⓖ學習
...
...

Ⓑ工作　◎◎◎◎◎　Ⓓ家庭
...　幸福寧靜週　...
...　◎◎◎◎◎　...

Ⓔ社群　Ⓐ健康　Ⓗ休閒
...
...

Read `references/weekly-eight-domain-layout.md` for the full mapping and phrase guidance.

Reverse Questions

Before finalizing, ask internally:

• Which one thing brings the most genuine happiness and peace?
• What can be smaller and still count?
• Which domain needs a minimum action rather than a heroic plan?
• Which relationship needs presence instead of advice?
• Which writing task becomes a card instead of a vague ambition?

Read `references/reverse-review-questions.md` when the review needs deeper diagnosis.

Default Output

For a normal weekly review, return:

1. One concise diagnosis. 2. One iMandalArt weekly card. 3. Three minimum actions. 4. Three cards to keep or publish. 5. One short "do less" note.

Do not over-explain unless the user asks for a full analysis.

Quality Rules

• Prefer evidence from files over generic productivity advice.
• Do not optimize only for achievement; optimize for happiness, peace, service, health, and meaningful work.
• Keep the weekly plan small enough to live.
• Mark uncertain claims as `待證`, `推論`, or `需補`.
• If writing or tool-building dominates, explicitly protect health, leisure, and finance.
• If relationships appear, turn them into presence and next-step cards, not contact chores.