Command
analyze-interviews
Analyze qualitative interview transcripts. Generates structured summaries, thematic codes, cross-case analysis, and evidence tables. Solves context-window…
@tobiasblaskView CommandContent
Command
/analyze-writing
Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation, and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement suggestions per section.
Install
> /plugin marketplace add TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine > /plugin install open-academic-paper-machine@open-paper-machine
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/analyze-writing
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation, and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement suggestions per section.
Command definition
analyze-writing.mddescription: >
Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice
overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation,
and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement
suggestions per section.
Analyze Writing: **$ARGUMENTS**
Activate the **writing-engine** skill. Read `skills/writing-engine/SKILL.md` in full, then execute a **style analysis** (not a drafting task):
1. **READ** the paper (draft.md or paper.tex) 2. **ANALYZE** each section for writing quality indicators:
- Passive voice ratio (target: <30% of sentences)
- Weak openings ("It is important...", "There are...", "In today's world...")
- Hedging balance (under-hedging vs. over-hedging)
- Average sentence length and variation (target: 15-25 words, varied)
- Word/phrase repetitions in consecutive sentences
- Paragraph length consistency (target: 4-8 sentences per paragraph)
- Transition quality between paragraphs
- Citation integration style (parenthetical vs. narrative balance)
3. **SCORE** each section (Strong / Adequate / Needs Work) 4. **LIST** specific improvements with line/section references 5. **SAVE** to `writing_analysis.md`
Input
`$ARGUMENTS` can be:
- **Empty** — analyzes the entire paper
- **Section name** (e.g., `"Introduction"`, `"Discussion"`) — analyzes one section
- **File path** to a specific file
Output
- `writing_analysis.md` — section-by-section quality scores + specific improvement suggestions
- Each suggestion includes the problematic text and a concrete rewrite option
Read more
description: > Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation, and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement suggestions per section.
Analyze Writing: **$ARGUMENTS**
Activate the **writing-engine** skill. Read `skills/writing-engine/SKILL.md` in full, then execute a **style analysis** (not a drafting task):
1. **READ** the paper (draft.md or paper.tex) 2. **ANALYZE** each section for writing quality indicators:
- Passive voice ratio (target: <30% of sentences)
- Weak openings ("It is important...", "There are...", "In today's world...")
- Hedging balance (under-hedging vs. over-hedging)
- Average sentence length and variation (target: 15-25 words, varied)
- Word/phrase repetitions in consecutive sentences
- Paragraph length consistency (target: 4-8 sentences per paragraph)
- Transition quality between paragraphs
- Citation integration style (parenthetical vs. narrative balance)
3. **SCORE** each section (Strong / Adequate / Needs Work) 4. **LIST** specific improvements with line/section references 5. **SAVE** to `writing_analysis.md`
Input
`$ARGUMENTS` can be:
- **Empty** — analyzes the entire paper
- **Section name** (e.g., `"Introduction"`, `"Discussion"`) — analyzes one section
- **File path** to a specific file
Output
- `writing_analysis.md` — section-by-section quality scores + specific improvement suggestions
- Each suggestion includes the problematic text and a concrete rewrite option
Ships withopen-academic-paper-machine
A Claude Code plugin that autonomously writes academic papers — from literature search to production-ready LaTeX/PDF. Scope note.
Get the whole plugin
Other commands on open-academic-paper-machine.
@tobiasblaskView CommandCommand
analyze-positioning
Analyze how the paper positions itself relative to the closest existing work. Identifies the 5-10 most similar papers, builds a differentiation matrix, and…
@tobiasblaskView CommandCommand
audit-paper
Audit a paper's empirical claims against the linked code repository — catches MISMATCH, MISSING, and PARTIAL claims before submission
@tobiasblaskView CommandCommand
brainstorm
Creative research brainstorming — generate ideas researchers within a single field would miss. Cross-field connections, assumption challenges, alternative…
@tobiasblaskView CommandCommand
draft-section
Write one specific section of a paper as complete paragraphs. Use when you already have context and just need one section drafted. Follows writing-engine…
@tobiasblaskView CommandCommand
evaluate-idea
Evaluate whether a research idea is worth pursuing before investing months of effort. Stress-tests ideas along 7 dimensions (novelty, impact, timing,…
@tobiasblaskView Command