/linkedin-interviewer

name: linkedin-interviewer
description: "Interview the user for the raw material their posts are made of. Builds a lasting Story Bank of roles, numbers, turning points, scars and positions, or runs a focused interview that turns one topic into a post spine. Use when a draft has nothing concrete to draw on, or the user says interview me. Not for learning how they write (use linkedin-humanizer --mode profile)."

LinkedIn Interviewer

Every writing skill here demands specifics: one odd-precision number with a named referent, a dated moment, a position someone would argue with. When the input has none, the rule is to ask the user rather than invent. That ask happens on every request, unstructured, and the answers are thrown away when the session ends.

This skill does the asking properly, once, and keeps the answers.

The two things it fills

| | `references/voice-profile.md` | `references/story-bank.md` | |---|---|---| | Holds | how you sound | what you have to say | | Built from | 3-6 posts you already wrote | an interview | | Built by | `linkedin-humanizer --mode profile` | this skill |

They are independent. Someone with no LinkedIn history cannot fill the first, but can always fill the second, which is the usual reason drafts come out generic.

When to use

• "Interview me", "ask me questions", "help me work out what to post about"
• A writing skill found the Story Bank empty and had to ask for a number mid-draft
• The user is new to posting: no archive to analyse, but a career to draw on
• Before setting up any unattended or scheduled drafting, which has no human

present to answer a mid-draft question

• The bank exists but has gone stale: a new role, a shipped project, a changed mind

Not for learning someone's writing style from their posts, which is `linkedin-humanizer --mode profile`. Run both; they answer different questions.

Modes

`--mode bank` (default)

A broad interview that fills `../../references/story-bank.md` and keeps it. Budget 20 to 40 minutes. It can be resumed: the file records which sections are thin, so a second session picks up there.

`--mode post`

A focused interview on one topic, 5 to 8 questions, ending in a post spine handed to `linkedin-post-writer`. Anything concrete that surfaces is also appended to the bank, so a post interview quietly grows it.

Steps, bank mode

1. **Read what exists.** If the bank has `filled: yes`, load it and interview only the thin sections. Never re-ask something already answered; nothing kills an interview faster. 2. **Open wide, not with a form.** One broad question, then follow what they actually get animated about. "What have you been working on that you cannot stop thinking about?" beats "Please list your achievements." 3. **Press every soft answer once.** This is the whole job. A soft answer is one a draft cannot use:

• "we improved performance" → "by how much, measured how, over what period?"
• "a while back" → "which month?"
• "a big client" → "can I name them, or do we keep it anonymous?"

Press once, accept the answer, move on. Twice is an interrogation. 4. **Chase the reversal.** Ask what they believed a year ago that they no longer believe, and what it cost to find out. Turning points and scars carry posts better than wins, and they are the sections most often left empty. 5. **Find the position.** Ask what they think is true that their peers disagree with, and what holding that view costs them. A claim with no cost is not a position and will not produce a post worth reading. 6. **Collect the told-out-loud stories.** Ask which three stories they already tell in person. They are pre-tested: the user already knows they land. 7. **Settle naming and limits explicitly.** Who and what can appear in public, who cannot, what subjects stay out entirely. Ask directly; do not infer. A draft that names the wrong client is not recoverable. 8. **Write the bank.** Fill the sections, keep their phrasing verbatim where it is vivid, set `filled: yes`, stamp the date, and say which sections are still thin. 9. **Show what it unlocks.** Name two or three specific posts the new material could produce, so the session ends with something rather than a filled form.

Steps, post mode

1. **Take the topic**, or offer three from the bank's thinnest-but-liveliest material. 2. **Ask for the moment, not the theme.** "When did this last actually happen to you?" A post needs a scene, not a subject. 3. **Get the number and the date.** Refuse to proceed on "recently" and "a lot". 4. **Ask what they got wrong.** The opening beat of most strong posts is a correction to something the author used to believe. 5. **Ask who disagrees.** That names the audience and supplies the tension. 6. **Ask what the reader should do differently.** That is the close. 7. **Read back the spine** and let them correct it. Their correction is usually better than the draft. The spine is five named lines, always these five, in this order:

| Line | Holds | Comes from | |---|---|---| | **Moment** | the scene and its date: what happened, when, to whom | step 2 | | **Number** | one figure, its referent, how it was measured | step 3 | | **Correction** | what they believed before, and what changed it | step 4 | | **Opposition** | who disagrees, which names the audience | step 5 | | **Ask** | what the reader should do differently | step 6 |

A line with nothing real in it stays empty and is labelled empty. An empty Number is a weaker post; an invented one is a retraction. 8. **Hand off** to `linkedin-post-writer`, passing the five lines verbatim under their own names so the writer can tell material from inference, and append anything concrete to the bank.

Hard rules

Global voice rules: see root `SKILL.md` §Voice rules. Additional skill-specific rules:

• **Never invent an answer, and never fill a gap with a plausible one.** An

unverified number in