/plan
AI가 구현 계획을 세워줍니다. 확인 후 코딩 시작.
> /plugin marketplace add sangrokjung/claude-forge > /plugin install claude-forge@claude-forge
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/plan
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
AI가 구현 계획을 세워줍니다. 확인 후 코딩 시작.
Command definition
plan.mddescription: AI가 구현 계획을 세워줍니다. 확인 후 코딩 시작.
allowed-tools: Agent, Read, Glob, Grep
Plan Command
This command invokes the **planner** agent to create a comprehensive implementation plan before writing any code.
What This Command Does
1. **Restate Requirements** - Clarify what needs to be built 2. **Identify Risks** - Surface potential issues and blockers 3. **Create Step Plan** - Break down implementation into phases 4. **Wait for Confirmation** - MUST receive user approval before proceeding
When to Use
Use `/plan` when:
- Starting a new feature
- Making significant architectural changes
- Working on complex refactoring
- Multiple files/components will be affected
- Requirements are unclear or ambiguous
How It Works
The planner agent will:
1. **Analyze the request** and restate requirements in clear terms 2. **Break down into phases** with specific, actionable steps 3. **Identify dependencies** between components 4. **Assess risks** and potential blockers 5. **Estimate complexity** (High/Medium/Low) 6. **Present the plan** and WAIT for your explicit confirmation
Example Usage
User: /plan I need to add real-time notifications when markets resolve
Agent (planner):
# Implementation Plan: Real-Time Market Resolution Notifications
## Requirements Restatement
- Send notifications to users when markets they're watching resolve
- Support multiple notification channels (in-app, email, webhook)
- Ensure notifications are delivered reliably
- Include market outcome and user's position result
## Implementation Phases
### Phase 1: Database Schema
- Add notifications table with columns: id, user_id, market_id, type, status, created_at
- Add user_notification_preferences table for channel preferences
- Create indexes on user_id and market_id for performance
### Phase 2: Notification Service
- Create notification service in lib/notifications.ts
- Implement notification queue using BullMQ/Redis
- Add retry logic for failed deliveries
- Create notification templates
### Phase 3: Integration Points
- Hook into market resolution logic (when status changes to "resolved")
- Query all users with positions in market
- Enqueue notifications for each user
### Phase 4: Frontend Components
- Create NotificationBell component in header
- Add NotificationList modal
- Implement real-time updates via Supabase subscriptions
- Add notification preferences page
## Dependencies
- Redis (for queue)
- Email service (SendGrid/Resend)
- Supabase real-time subscriptions
## Risks
- HIGH: Email deliverability (SPF/DKIM required)
- MEDIUM: Performance with 1000+ users per market
- MEDIUM: Notification spam if markets resolve frequently
- LOW: Real-time subscription overhead
## Estimated Complexity: MEDIUM
- Backend: 4-6 hours
- Frontend: 3-4 hours
- Testing: 2-3 hours
- Total: 9-13 hours
**WAITING FOR CONFIRMATION**: Proceed with this plan? (yes/no/modify)
Common Rationalizations — 계획 건너뛰기 합리화 차단
| 변명 | 현실 | |------|------| | "간단해서 계획 안 해도 돼" | 간단한 것도 3+ 파일 수정이면 계획 필요. "간단하다"는 착각이 가장 위험. | | "이미 머릿속에 다 있어" | 머릿속 계획은 빠진 게 보이지 않는다. 문서화하면 빈 곳이 드러남. | | "시간 없어서 바로 코딩" | 계획 없이 코딩 → 재작업 시간이 계획 시간의 3~5배. | | "요구사항이 명확해서" | 명확한 요구사항도 구현 순서/의존성/리스크는 계획에서 드러남. | | "프로토타입이니까" | 프로토타입이 프로덕션 되는 법. 최소한의 계획이라도 세워라. | | "코드 보면서 파악할게" | 코드 읽기는 탐색이지 계획이 아니다. 방향 없는 탐색은 시간 낭비. | | "이전에 비슷한 거 해봤으니까" | 비슷하다고 같지 않다. 차이점이 버그의 원인. |
Red Flags — 즉시 /plan 실행
- 수정할 파일이 3개 이상인데 계획 없이 시작
- "일단 해보고 안 되면 고치자"
- 코드 작성 시작 후 "아, 이것도 바꿔야 하네" 연쇄 발생
- 30분 이상 코딩했는데 완료 기준이 불명확
- 팀원/사용자에게 "얼마나 걸려?" 질문에 답 못 함
Important Notes
**CRITICAL**: The planner agent will **NOT** write any code until you explicitly confirm the plan with "yes" or "proceed" or similar affirmative response.
If you want changes, respond with:
- "modify: [your changes]"
- "different approach: [alternative]"
- "skip phase 2 and do phase 3 first"
Integration with Other Commands
After planning:
- Use `/tdd` to implement with test-driven development
- Use `/build-and-fix` if build errors occur
- Use `/code-review` to review completed implementation
Related Agents
This command invokes the `planner` agent located at: `~/.claude/agents/planner.md`
---
다음 단계
계획이 확정되면:
- `/tdd`로 구현 시작
- `/auto`로 전체 자동 진행
Read more
description: AI가 구현 계획을 세워줍니다. 확인 후 코딩 시작. allowed-tools: Agent, Read, Glob, Grep
Plan Command
This command invokes the **planner** agent to create a comprehensive implementation plan before writing any code.
What This Command Does
1. **Restate Requirements** - Clarify what needs to be built 2. **Identify Risks** - Surface potential issues and blockers 3. **Create Step Plan** - Break down implementation into phases 4. **Wait for Confirmation** - MUST receive user approval before proceeding
When to Use
Use `/plan` when:
- Starting a new feature
- Making significant architectural changes
- Working on complex refactoring
- Multiple files/components will be affected
- Requirements are unclear or ambiguous
How It Works
The planner agent will:
1. **Analyze the request** and restate requirements in clear terms 2. **Break down into phases** with specific, actionable steps 3. **Identify dependencies** between components 4. **Assess risks** and potential blockers 5. **Estimate complexity** (High/Medium/Low) 6. **Present the plan** and WAIT for your explicit confirmation
Example Usage
User: /plan I need to add real-time notifications when markets resolve Agent (planner): # Implementation Plan: Real-Time Market Resolution Notifications ## Requirements Restatement - Send notifications to users when markets they're watching resolve - Support multiple notification channels (in-app, email, webhook) - Ensure notifications are delivered reliably - Include market outcome and user's position result ## Implementation Phases ### Phase 1: Database Schema - Add notifications table with columns: id, user_id, market_id, type, status, created_at - Add user_notification_preferences table for channel preferences - Create indexes on user_id and market_id for performance ### Phase 2: Notification Service - Create notification service in lib/notifications.ts - Implement notification queue using BullMQ/Redis - Add retry logic for failed deliveries - Create notification templates ### Phase 3: Integration Points - Hook into market resolution logic (when status changes to "resolved") - Query all users with positions in market - Enqueue notifications for each user ### Phase 4: Frontend Components - Create NotificationBell component in header - Add NotificationList modal - Implement real-time updates via Supabase subscriptions - Add notification preferences page ## Dependencies - Redis (for queue) - Email service (SendGrid/Resend) - Supabase real-time subscriptions ## Risks - HIGH: Email deliverability (SPF/DKIM required) - MEDIUM: Performance with 1000+ users per market - MEDIUM: Notification spam if markets resolve frequently - LOW: Real-time subscription overhead ## Estimated Complexity: MEDIUM - Backend: 4-6 hours - Frontend: 3-4 hours - Testing: 2-3 hours - Total: 9-13 hours **WAITING FOR CONFIRMATION**: Proceed with this plan? (yes/no/modify)
Common Rationalizations — 계획 건너뛰기 합리화 차단
| 변명 | 현실 | |------|------| | "간단해서 계획 안 해도 돼" | 간단한 것도 3+ 파일 수정이면 계획 필요. "간단하다"는 착각이 가장 위험. | | "이미 머릿속에 다 있어" | 머릿속 계획은 빠진 게 보이지 않는다. 문서화하면 빈 곳이 드러남. | | "시간 없어서 바로 코딩" | 계획 없이 코딩 → 재작업 시간이 계획 시간의 3~5배. | | "요구사항이 명확해서" | 명확한 요구사항도 구현 순서/의존성/리스크는 계획에서 드러남. | | "프로토타입이니까" | 프로토타입이 프로덕션 되는 법. 최소한의 계획이라도 세워라. | | "코드 보면서 파악할게" | 코드 읽기는 탐색이지 계획이 아니다. 방향 없는 탐색은 시간 낭비. | | "이전에 비슷한 거 해봤으니까" | 비슷하다고 같지 않다. 차이점이 버그의 원인. |
Red Flags — 즉시 /plan 실행
- 수정할 파일이 3개 이상인데 계획 없이 시작
- "일단 해보고 안 되면 고치자"
- 코드 작성 시작 후 "아, 이것도 바꿔야 하네" 연쇄 발생
- 30분 이상 코딩했는데 완료 기준이 불명확
- 팀원/사용자에게 "얼마나 걸려?" 질문에 답 못 함
Important Notes
**CRITICAL**: The planner agent will **NOT** write any code until you explicitly confirm the plan with "yes" or "proceed" or similar affirmative response.
If you want changes, respond with:
- "modify: [your changes]"
- "different approach: [alternative]"
- "skip phase 2 and do phase 3 first"
Integration with Other Commands
After planning:
- Use `/tdd` to implement with test-driven development
- Use `/build-and-fix` if build errors occur
- Use `/code-review` to review completed implementation
Related Agents
This command invokes the `planner` agent located at: `~/.claude/agents/planner.md`
---
다음 단계
계획이 확정되면:
- `/tdd`로 구현 시작
- `/auto`로 전체 자동 진행
Supercharge Claude Code with 11 AI agents, 36 commands & 15 skills — the claude-code plugin framework inspired by oh-my-zsh. 6-layer security hooks included. 5-min install.
Repo: sangrokjung/claude-forge
Other commands on claude-forge.
- /agent-router
전문 에이전트 자동 라우팅. 법률, 재무, 특허, SEO, 마케팅, 기획, BM 설계(BMC/Lean/JTBD/Wardley/Blue Ocean/Lightning Sprint), 코드리뷰, 아키텍처, 견적, CRM, HR/인사, 노무(노동법/해고/산재/취업규칙), 리서치, 데이터 분석, 제1원칙 사고, 주식 투자, 부동산 투자, 명리학, 회사운영(노란우산/창업혜택/고용지원/세무일정), 디자인 제작(배너/카드뉴스/SNS/광고/인포그래픽), FAQ/지식베이스(KCS/셀프서비스/아티클),
Open command - /auto
계획부터 PR까지 원버튼 자동 실행. 중간에 멈추지 않습니다.
Open command - /build-fix
빌드 에러를 자동으로 분석하고 수정합니다.
Open command - /checkpoint
작업 상태 저장/복원 (v6)
Open command - /code-review
방금 작성한 코드를 보안+품질 검사합니다.
Open command - /commit-push-pr
머지 전 /sync-docs 문서 동기화 의무 게이트 → 검증 → 커밋 & PR & 머지 + MCP 알림 (v7)
Open command

