agent-common
Shared preamble loaded by all cc10x agents — memory protocol, contract format, output rules.
Two-mode skill: (1) session memory — load/persist durable workflow state under .cc10x/ (activeContext, patterns, progress) so context survives compaction; (2) handoff package — portable, secrets-redacted export for a coworker, different tool, or fresh non-cc10x session.
$ npx -y skills add romiluz13/cc10x --skill memory-and-handoff --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/memory-and-handoffContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Two-mode skill: (1) session memory — load/persist durable workflow state under .cc10x/ (activeContext, patterns, progress) so context survives compaction; (2) handoff package — portable, secrets-redacted export for a coworker, different tool, or fresh non-cc10x session.
name: memory-and-handoff description: | Two-mode skill: (1) session memory — load/persist durable workflow state under .cc10x/ (activeContext, patterns, progress) so context survives compaction; (2) handoff package — portable, secrets-redacted export for a coworker, different tool, or fresh non-cc10x session. allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob user-invocable: false
Read only what's needed:
---
Memory is an index, not a transcript. Distill decisions, learnings, references, and verification evidence into durable, reusable notes.
| File | Holds | | ------ | ------- | | `.cc10x/activeContext.md` | current focus, recent changes, decisions, learnings, references, blockers | | `.cc10x/patterns.md` | reusable project standards, gotchas, conventions, skill hints | | `.cc10x/progress.md` | current workflow, tasks snapshot, completed items, verification evidence | | `.cc10x/workflows/{wf}.json` + `.events.jsonl` | durable orchestration truth (machine-owned, verbatim) | | `docs/plans/*`, `docs/research/*` | detailed artifacts; memory points to them |
Read all three: `activeContext.md`, `patterns.md`, `progress.md`.
Re-read before: architectural decisions (`patterns.md` + `activeContext.md ## Decisions`), implementation choices (`patterns.md` + `activeContext.md`), debugging (all three), planning next steps (`progress.md` + `activeContext.md`), claiming completion (`progress.md` + plan/design/research refs), user says "continue" (all three).
Emit `MEMORY_NOTES` in Router Contract:
MEMORY_NOTES: learnings: ["Key causal insight"] patterns: ["Reusable gotcha or convention"] verification: ["`npm test` -> exit 0"] deferred: ["Non-blocking follow-up or risk"]
Keep each entry one line — memory reloads every session; each extra line is a recurring tax. Prefer stable nouns over temporary wording. Put verification truth in `verification`, not prose. Put non-blocking work in `deferred`, not ad-hoc tasks.
**Persist only memory-worthy items:** decisions that change direction, learnings that prevent mistakes, verification evidence with commands and exit truth, deferred non-blocking issues, plan/design/research references, clarified user standards.
**Do not persist:** whole diffs, verbose logs, celebratory narration, "looked correct" without evidence, duplicate notes, raw secrets/PII in outward artifacts.
Before router persists cc10x-authored content into outward artifacts (`docs/plans/*`, `docs/research/*`, design docs, persisted memory notes): redact pasted tokens, API keys, connection-strings, credentials, PII. Replace with `<redacted:secret>` (PII: `<redacted:pii>`). Keep surrounding constraint intact. When unsure, redact. Does NOT apply to internal machine-owned `.cc10x/` orchestration state — that stays verbatim for resume/dedupe keys.
| Tier | What | Rule | | ------ | ------ | ------ | | KEEP | user hard-constraints/prohibitions, exact next step, open failures + errors | preserve VERBATIM — never paraphrase a constraint or error | | SUMMARIZE | resolved decisions with rationale, concluded attempts, discovered file/module boundaries | distill to one durable line each | | DROP | decorative prose, step-by-step diary, superseded speculation, redundant prompt retellings | discard |
Persist user PROHIBITIONS verbatim into workflow artifact's intent field as soon as stated — compaction may fire before router's normal persist.
After loading memory, check `patterns.md ## Project SKILL_HINTS`. Invoke listed skills when relevant and installed. Treat missing skills as non-fatal. Do not invent skill IDs. Do not edit `## Project SKILL_HINTS` directly — surface recommendations in planner output or memory notes.
---
A portable, human-readable export for when the next reader is NOT this cc10x session — a coworker, a different tool, or a clean session with no cc10x router.
cc10x's own resume is structural (`.cc10x/` + router rehydrates). The handoff package is the bridge OUT to a reader who cannot read `.cc10x/` orchestration state.
1. **Write to OS temp dir, never into the repo** — a repo-committed handoff becomes a stale doc the next reader mistakes for current truth. `HANDOFF="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/handoff-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).md"`. Print the absolute path. 2. **Reference artifacts by path/URL, never paste contents.** The next reader has the repo. They need a map, not a copy. Prefer behavioral descriptions over `file:line` where co
The Loop Engine for Claude Code — engineer the loop, not the prompt. 1 router · 9 agents · 16 skills · 4 workflows. Fail-closed gates, test honesty, anti-anchored review.
Repo: romiluz13/cc10x
Shared preamble loaded by all cc10x agents — memory protocol, contract format, output rules.
Greenfield architecture design: map functionality flows, draw components, design APIs, classify dependencies, plan observability. For multi-component, API,…
Implementation skill for writing production code with TDD. Covers the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, false-RED detection, vertical slicing, scope escalation, test…
Answers questions about cc10x itself — what it is, how to install and configure it, how the router, workflows, memory, and hooks operate, and how to…
THE ONLY ENTRY POINT FOR CC10X. Activate this skill for build, debug, review, and plan requests. Use when the user asks to implement, fix, review, plan, test,…
Two-mode skill: (1) adversarial review — spec compliance + code quality + security, confidence-scored findings with file:line evidence; (2) receiving review —…