adr-workflow
Scaffold, accept, index, and link Architectural Decision Records (ADRs). Use when the user says "write an ADR", "record this decision", "resolve [deferred…
Persist new context, terms, learnings, and settled lightweight decisions. Use when the user says remember this, save this for later, add to glossary, note this down, or at session end to consolidate what was learned — that goes to the memory layer (CLAUDE.md hot cache,
$ npx -y skills add ramboz/jig --skill memory-sync --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/memory-syncContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Persist new context, terms, learnings, and settled lightweight decisions. Use when the user says remember this, save this for later, add to glossary, note this down, or at session end to consolidate what was learned — that goes to the memory layer (CLAUDE.md hot cache,
name: memory-sync description: > Persist new context, terms, learnings, and settled lightweight decisions. Use when the user says remember this, save this for later, add to glossary, note this down, or at session end to consolidate what was learned — that goes to the memory layer (CLAUDE.md hot cache, docs/memory/, docs/inbox.md). Also use to record a decision or remember this decision when the call is a lightweight one shipped outside a spec slice: UI strings, visual and CSS choices, copy, or translation fixes. Those go to docs/decisions/lightweight-decisions.md via decisions.py. Also use when revising, updating, or re-pricing an already-recorded decision: judge whether it now warrants an ADR and promote it if so, rather than editing it in place. Also auto-fires at session end. Do not use for updating specs or code comments. For a NEW load-bearing decision, one with rejected alternatives, or any the user wants written up as an ADR, use `/jig:adr-workflow`; an already-recorded entry that outgrew this home is promoted from here. user-invocable: true
> Spec 002 (memory layer) is fully closed — all four slices DONE: 002-01 > (explicit-sync), 002-02 (lookup-pattern), 002-03 (auto-detect-hooks), > 002-04 (reconciliation-integration). 002-04's reconciliation integration > is now the Memory-sync gate in the spec-workflow reconciliation checklist.
Persists session-derived context to the memory layer via a deterministic helper. Claude makes the *what / where* decisions; `memory.py` does the file I/O, idempotency, and self-healing of missing memory structure.
"note this down", or similar (→ persist flow below).
choice, translation correction, or scoped brand/icon call made *outside* a spec slice (→ lightweight-decision flow below). This is the forcing function for out-of-spec work, which has no reconciliation phase to catch it.
When you see a capitalized reference, acronym, or project-specific term you don't recognize, follow this flow **before asking the user**:
seen unknown reference X ↓ python3 memory.py lookup "X" . ↓ exit 0 → use the printed definition; do not ask ↓ exit 2 → ask the user once: "I don't recognize X — what is it?" ↓ user answers ↓ python3 memory.py add-term "X" "<definition>" . (or promote if high-frequency) ↓ next time X appears, lookup hits
Concretely, the commands are:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" lookup "<term>" "<target>"
# exit 0 = hit (definition + source on stdout)
# exit 2 = miss (proceed to ask the user)The lookup is case-insensitive and checks hot cache first, then glossary. Hot cache hits win when a term exists in both (the user has explicitly elevated it).
**Do not ask twice.** Once a term is persisted (via `add-term` or `promote`), future lookups in the same or later sessions resolve without re-asking. If the user says "I told you this already," check whether you forgot to persist last time, then persist now.
1. **Identify candidate items** from the recent session:
translation corrections, scoped brand/icon calls settled *outside* a spec slice. **Conditional, to avoid noise:** only surface this when the session actually touched such product/UI/out-of-spec work — skip it entirely for pure backend/refactor/spec sessions.
enumerated surface list above is **not** a closed gate. This session-end prompt is the **only** judgment owner for *out-of-spec* load-bearing decisions (which have no reconciliation phase), so also surface — regardless of which surface was touched — any decision the canonical ADR trigger covers. Canonical wording — single-sourced from ADR-0031, drift-tested verbatim across all four surfaces: A load-bearing design choice with rejected alternatives — one a future agent would need to know about to avoid undoing it — warrants an ADR even when it changes no module boundary or public contract. 2. **Decide per item** which file it belongs in:
3. **Invoke `memory.py` once per item** with the right command. **Always quote the term/definition/body arguments** — terms may contain spaces, definitions often contain punctuation:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-term "<name>" "<definition>" "<target>"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-learning "<title>" --body "<text>" "<target>"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-inbox "<text>" "<target>"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-refinement-todo "<raw-markdown-chunk>" "<target>"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" promote "<term>" "<definition>" "<target>"`add-refinement-todo` appends raw text (caller composes the markdown chunk — H
A Claude Code and Codex plugin that scaffolds AI-native development practices into new projects. jig adds a repeatable spec, implementation, review, and memory workflow to AI-assisted software projects.
Scaffold, accept, index, and link Architectural Decision Records (ADRs). Use when the user says "write an ADR", "record this decision", "resolve [deferred…
Cross-artifact consistency report for jig specs — a non-destructive six-category audit at CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW severity, covering duplication, ambiguity,…
Team baseline for architecture, design-doc, and RFC review — produces summary, strengths, concerns, and open questions. Auto-triggers when you say review this…
Drive the teeth-gated lifecycle for reported defects: diagnose root cause, prove it, and prevent regression through REPORTED → DIAGNOSING → ROOT_CAUSED →…
Lightweight spec clarification scan for jig projects — a six-category ambiguity audit that asks up to five prioritized questions and appends them to the spec's…
Run a static-analysis pass on a project — detect the ecosystem (Python or Node), drive its linter (ruff / eslint, plus advisory pyright/complexity/ prettier…