/reasoning-resonance
Measure semantic resonance (E_resonance) to assess reasoning stability and coherence over time.
$ npx -y skills add qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/reasoning-resonance
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Measure semantic resonance (E_resonance) to assess reasoning stability and coherence over time.
Command definition
reasoning-resonance.mdtools:
- read
- write
- grep
- bash
Semantic Resonance Measurement
Measure semantic resonance (E_resonance) to assess reasoning stability and coherence over time.
Based on the WFGY project: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY
Instructions
1. **Initialize Resonance Analysis**
- Load semantic tree nodes (last 30)
- Extract semantic residue values (B)
- Calculate rolling windows (5, 10, 20 nodes)
- Set resonance parameters:
- Window size: 10 nodes
- Decay factor: 0.9
- Stability threshold: 0.3
2. **Calculate E_resonance**
E_resonance = Rolling_Mean(|B|) over last n nodes
Where:
B = Semantic residue from BBMC
|B| = Magnitude of residue
n = Window size
Weighted formula:
E_res = Σ(w_i * |B_i|) / Σ(w_i)
w_i = decay^(n-i)
3. **Analyze Resonance Patterns**
- **Stable Resonance** (E < 0.3):
- Consistent reasoning
- Low semantic noise
- High coherence
- **Moderate Resonance** (0.3 ≤ E < 0.6):
- Normal variation
- Acceptable noise
- Manageable complexity
- **High Resonance** (0.6 ≤ E < 0.85):
- Increasing instability
- Growing incoherence
- Risk of breakdown
- **Critical Resonance** (E ≥ 0.85):
- System instability
- Logic breakdown risk
- BBCR trigger zone
4. **Identify Resonance Sources**
- Topic changes (high ΔS transitions)
- Logic contradictions
- Rapid context switches
- Unresolved ambiguity
- Accumulating errors
5. **Generate Stability Report**
- Current resonance value
- Trend analysis
- Contributing factors
- Stabilization recommendations
- Risk assessment
Output Format
SEMANTIC RESONANCE ANALYSIS
═══════════════════════════════════════
Current E_resonance: [value]
Stability Status: [Stable/Moderate/Unstable/Critical]
Resonance Visualization:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Low Medium High
0.0 0.5 1.0
[═══════════▼═════════════]
[value]
Resonance Over Time:
────────────────────────────────────────
1.0 │ ╱╲
0.8 │ ╱ ╲ ╱╲
0.6 │ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ ⚠️
0.4 │ ╱ ╲╱ ╲ ╱
0.2 │ ╱ ╲╱ ← Current
0.0 └──────────────────────────
-30 -20 -10 0
Nodes Ago
Window Analysis:
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Window │ E_res │ Trend │ Status │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5 nodes │ 0.42 │ ↑ │ ⚠️ Rising│
│ 10 nodes│ 0.38 │ → │ Stable │
│ 20 nodes│ 0.35 │ ↓ │ ✓ Good │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Resonance Components:
• Semantic Residue: [average |B|]
• Variation: [standard deviation]
• Peak Value: [max |B|]
• Frequency: [oscillation rate]
Stability Factors:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Positive (Stabilizing):
✓ Consistent topic focus
✓ Logical progression
✓ Low ΔS transitions
Negative (Destabilizing):
⚠️ Rapid context switches
⚠️ Unresolved contradictions
⚠️ Increasing complexity
Resonance Sources Identified:
1. Node [id]: High residue ([value]) - [reason]
2. Node [id]: Logic jump - [description]
3. Node [id]: Context switch - [description]
Harmonic Analysis:
• Fundamental Frequency: [value] cycles/node
• Dominant Period: [value] nodes
• Phase Coherence: [percentage]%
• Entropy: [value]
Risk Assessment:
────────────────────────────────────────
Current Risk: [Low/Medium/High/Critical]
Breakdown Probability: [percentage]%
Time to Critical (if rising): [nodes]
Stabilization Recommendations:
1. [Primary action to reduce resonance]
2. [Secondary measure]
3. [Preventive step]
Suggested Commands:
• Reduce resonance: /wfgy:bbmc
• Stabilize logic: /reasoning:chain-validate
• Focus attention: /wfgy:bbam
• Create checkpoint: /memory:checkpointResonance Patterns
Stable Pattern
E: 0.2 → 0.2 → 0.3 → 0.2 → 0.2
Oscillating Pattern
E: 0.2 → 0.5 → 0.2 → 0.6 → 0.2
Rising Pattern (Warning)
E: 0.3 → 0.4 → 0.5 → 0.6 → 0.7
Critical Pattern
E: 0.7 → 0.8 → 0.85 → 0.9 → BBCR
Resonance Management
Reducing Resonance
- Simplify reasoning
- Focus on single topic
- Resolve contradictions
- Slow down transitions
Maintaining Stability
- Monitor continuously
- Early intervention
- Regular checkpoints
- Gradual changes
Recovery from High Resonance
- Trigger BBCR
- Return to checkpoint
- Simplify approach
- Reset context
Advanced Analysis
# Custom window size
/reasoning:resonance --window 15
# Frequency analysis
/reasoning:resonance --fourier
# Predictive modeling
/reasoning:resonance --predict 10
# Compare with baseline
/reasoning:resonance --baseline
Integration
Resonance measurement feeds:
- `/boundary:risk-assess` for stability
- `/wfgy:bbcr` for triggers
- `/semantic:node-build` for recording
- `/memory:checkpoint` for safety
Read more
tools: - read - write - grep - bash
Semantic Resonance Measurement
Measure semantic resonance (E_resonance) to assess reasoning stability and coherence over time.
Based on the WFGY project: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY
Instructions
1. **Initialize Resonance Analysis**
- Load semantic tree nodes (last 30)
- Extract semantic residue values (B)
- Calculate rolling windows (5, 10, 20 nodes)
- Set resonance parameters:
- Window size: 10 nodes
- Decay factor: 0.9
- Stability threshold: 0.3
2. **Calculate E_resonance**
E_resonance = Rolling_Mean(|B|) over last n nodes Where: B = Semantic residue from BBMC |B| = Magnitude of residue n = Window size Weighted formula: E_res = Σ(w_i * |B_i|) / Σ(w_i) w_i = decay^(n-i)
3. **Analyze Resonance Patterns**
- **Stable Resonance** (E < 0.3):
- Consistent reasoning
- Low semantic noise
- High coherence
- **Moderate Resonance** (0.3 ≤ E < 0.6):
- Normal variation
- Acceptable noise
- Manageable complexity
- **High Resonance** (0.6 ≤ E < 0.85):
- Increasing instability
- Growing incoherence
- Risk of breakdown
- **Critical Resonance** (E ≥ 0.85):
- System instability
- Logic breakdown risk
- BBCR trigger zone
4. **Identify Resonance Sources**
- Topic changes (high ΔS transitions)
- Logic contradictions
- Rapid context switches
- Unresolved ambiguity
- Accumulating errors
5. **Generate Stability Report**
- Current resonance value
- Trend analysis
- Contributing factors
- Stabilization recommendations
- Risk assessment
Output Format
SEMANTIC RESONANCE ANALYSIS
═══════════════════════════════════════
Current E_resonance: [value]
Stability Status: [Stable/Moderate/Unstable/Critical]
Resonance Visualization:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Low Medium High
0.0 0.5 1.0
[═══════════▼═════════════]
[value]
Resonance Over Time:
────────────────────────────────────────
1.0 │ ╱╲
0.8 │ ╱ ╲ ╱╲
0.6 │ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ ⚠️
0.4 │ ╱ ╲╱ ╲ ╱
0.2 │ ╱ ╲╱ ← Current
0.0 └──────────────────────────
-30 -20 -10 0
Nodes Ago
Window Analysis:
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Window │ E_res │ Trend │ Status │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5 nodes │ 0.42 │ ↑ │ ⚠️ Rising│
│ 10 nodes│ 0.38 │ → │ Stable │
│ 20 nodes│ 0.35 │ ↓ │ ✓ Good │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Resonance Components:
• Semantic Residue: [average |B|]
• Variation: [standard deviation]
• Peak Value: [max |B|]
• Frequency: [oscillation rate]
Stability Factors:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Positive (Stabilizing):
✓ Consistent topic focus
✓ Logical progression
✓ Low ΔS transitions
Negative (Destabilizing):
⚠️ Rapid context switches
⚠️ Unresolved contradictions
⚠️ Increasing complexity
Resonance Sources Identified:
1. Node [id]: High residue ([value]) - [reason]
2. Node [id]: Logic jump - [description]
3. Node [id]: Context switch - [description]
Harmonic Analysis:
• Fundamental Frequency: [value] cycles/node
• Dominant Period: [value] nodes
• Phase Coherence: [percentage]%
• Entropy: [value]
Risk Assessment:
────────────────────────────────────────
Current Risk: [Low/Medium/High/Critical]
Breakdown Probability: [percentage]%
Time to Critical (if rising): [nodes]
Stabilization Recommendations:
1. [Primary action to reduce resonance]
2. [Secondary measure]
3. [Preventive step]
Suggested Commands:
• Reduce resonance: /wfgy:bbmc
• Stabilize logic: /reasoning:chain-validate
• Focus attention: /wfgy:bbam
• Create checkpoint: /memory:checkpointResonance Patterns
Stable Pattern
E: 0.2 → 0.2 → 0.3 → 0.2 → 0.2
Oscillating Pattern
E: 0.2 → 0.5 → 0.2 → 0.6 → 0.2
Rising Pattern (Warning)
E: 0.3 → 0.4 → 0.5 → 0.6 → 0.7
Critical Pattern
E: 0.7 → 0.8 → 0.85 → 0.9 → BBCR
Resonance Management
Reducing Resonance
- Simplify reasoning
- Focus on single topic
- Resolve contradictions
- Slow down transitions
Maintaining Stability
- Monitor continuously
- Early intervention
- Regular checkpoints
- Gradual changes
Recovery from High Resonance
- Trigger BBCR
- Return to checkpoint
- Simplify approach
- Reset context
Advanced Analysis
# Custom window size /reasoning:resonance --window 15 # Frequency analysis /reasoning:resonance --fourier # Predictive modeling /reasoning:resonance --predict 10 # Compare with baseline /reasoning:resonance --baseline
Integration
Resonance measurement feeds:
- `/boundary:risk-assess` for stability
- `/wfgy:bbcr` for triggers
- `/semantic:node-build` for recording
- `/memory:checkpoint` for safety
A comprehensive development toolkit designed following Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices for AI-assisted software development.
Repo: qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite
Other commands on claude-command-suite.
- /boundary-bbcr-fallback
Execute automatic BBCR (Collapse-Rebirth Correction) when knowledge boundaries are exceeded or reasoning fails.
Open command - /boundary-detect
Analyze semantic position relative to knowledge boundaries to prevent hallucination and identify uncertainty zones.
Open command - /boundary-heatmap
Generate a visual heatmap of knowledge boundaries showing safe zones, risk areas, and semantic coverage.
Open command - /boundary-risk-assess
Evaluate the current risk level and provide detailed analysis of potential hallucination or reasoning failure.
Open command - /boundary-safe-bridge
Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.
Open command - /optimize-prompt
Takes an input prompt and returns ONLY a token-optimized version that preserves meaning while minimizing token count. Based on LLM tokenization principles: common words tokenize more efficiently, unusual words break into more tokens, and conciseness reduces cost.
Open command

