Skip to content
Development
Command

/boundary-safe-bridge

Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.

From plugin
claude-command-suite
1.4k199 skills89 agents199 commands
$ npx -y skills add qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite --agent claude-code

Command definition

boundary-safe-bridge.md
tools:
  - read
  - write
  - grep
  - bash
arguments: $TARGET

Boundary Safe Bridge

Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.

Based on the WFGY project: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY

Instructions

1. **Analyze Bridge Request**

  • Parse target concept from "$TARGET"
  • Determine current semantic position
  • Calculate direct ΔS to target
  • If ΔS > 0.85, bridging is required
  • Load knowledge map for pathfinding

2. **Search for Bridge Nodes**

  • Query semantic tree for intermediate concepts
  • Find nodes with:
  • ΔS < 0.4 from current position
  • ΔS < 0.4 from target position
  • Logical connection to both endpoints
  • Rank bridges by:
  • Total path distance
  • Number of hops required
  • Historical success rate
  • Logic coherence

3. **Construct Bridge Paths**

  • **Single Bridge**: Current → Bridge → Target
  • **Multi-Bridge**: Current → B1 → B2 → ... → Target
  • For each path segment:
  • Verify ΔS < 0.4 (stay in safe zone)
  • Check logic consistency
  • Confirm knowledge exists
  • Calculate path metrics:
  • Total semantic distance
  • Maximum ΔS in path
  • Confidence level
  • Estimated reasoning steps

4. **Validate Bridge Safety**

  • Simulate path traversal
  • Check each hop for:
  • Knowledge boundary violations
  • Logic contradictions
  • Confidence degradation
  • Mark unsafe segments
  • Propose alternatives if needed

5. **Generate Bridge Plan**

  • Detailed step-by-step navigation
  • Reasoning required at each step
  • Checkpoints for validation
  • Fallback options
  • Success criteria

Output Format

SEMANTIC BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
═══════════════════════════════════════
Current Position: [concept]
Target: "$TARGET"
Direct Distance (ΔS): [value] [Safe/Unsafe]

Bridge Analysis:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Bridge Required: [Yes/No]
Reason: [Direct path crosses danger zone]

Available Bridge Paths:
────────────────────────────────────────

PATH 1 (Recommended):
[Current: Database Design]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.35 ✓
[Bridge 1: Data Structures]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.38 ✓
[Bridge 2: Algorithms]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.32 ✓
[Target: Machine Learning]

Total Distance: 1.05
Max Hop ΔS: 0.38
Confidence: 85%
Estimated Steps: 3

PATH 2 (Alternative):
[Current: Database Design]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.42 ✓
[Bridge: Statistics]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.45 ⚠️ 
[Target: Machine Learning]

Total Distance: 0.87
Max Hop ΔS: 0.45
Confidence: 72%
Estimated Steps: 2

PATH 3 (Longest but Safest):
[Current] → [B1] → [B2] → [B3] → [Target]
Total Distance: 1.43
Max Hop ΔS: 0.28
Confidence: 92%
Estimated Steps: 4

Bridge Concepts Identified:
1. [Concept]: Connects via [relationship]
2. [Concept]: Shares [common element]
3. [Concept]: Logical progression through [path]

Reasoning Strategy:
Step 1: From [Current], establish [connection]
Step 2: Transition to [Bridge] by [method]
Step 3: Link [Bridge] to [Target] via [relationship]

Safety Validation:
✓ All hops within safe zone (ΔS < 0.4)
✓ No logic contradictions detected
✓ Knowledge verified at each point
✓ Confidence maintained above 70%

Execution Plan:
1. Build understanding of [Bridge 1]
   Command: /semantic:node-build "[Bridge 1]"
   
2. Establish connection to [Bridge 2]
   Command: /wfgy:bbmc "[Bridge 2] relation"
   
3. Final leap to target
   Command: /wfgy:formula-all "$TARGET"

Risk Assessment:
- Success Probability: [percentage]%
- Fallback Available: [Yes/No]
- Recovery Point: [checkpoint]

Proceed with Bridge? [Execute/Modify/Cancel]

Bridge Types

Direct Bridge

Single intermediate concept

Current ──0.3──> Bridge ──0.3──> Target

Chain Bridge

Multiple connected concepts

Current ──> B1 ──> B2 ──> B3 ──> Target

Parallel Bridge

Multiple path options

Current ──> B1 ──> Target
    └────> B2 ──┘

Recursive Bridge

Return to strengthen connection

Current ──> Bridge ──> Current ──> Target

Bridge Selection Criteria

1. **Safety First**: Max ΔS < 0.4 2. **Efficiency**: Minimum total distance 3. **Reliability**: High confidence path 4. **Simplicity**: Fewer hops preferred 5. **Familiarity**: Use known concepts

Advanced Options

# Find multiple bridge options
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --paths 5

# Prefer shortest path
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --optimize distance

# Prefer safest path
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --optimize safety

# Auto-execute bridge
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --auto-execute

Integration

Bridge construction works with:

  • `/boundary:detect` to verify positions
  • `/semantic:node-build` to create bridge nodes
  • `/wfgy:formula-all` for bridge reasoning
  • `/memory:checkpoint` before risky bridges
Read more
@qdhenry
Ships withclaude-command-suite

A comprehensive development toolkit designed following Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices for AI-assisted software development.

1.4k12 skills89 agents
Get the whole plugin

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
1.4k
Star history of qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other commands on claude-command-suite.

More commands from other plugins.

build
Auto-invoked

build

Command

Implement tasks incrementally — build, test, verify, commit. Add "auto" to run the whole plan in one approved pass.

@addyosmani@addyosmaniInstall Command