Skip to content
Development
Command

/boundary-safe-bridge

Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.

From plugin
claude-command-suite
1.3k199 skills89 agents199 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/boundary-safe-bridge

Context preview

What this command does when you run it.

Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.

Command definition

boundary-safe-bridge.md
tools:
  - read
  - write
  - grep
  - bash
arguments: $TARGET

Boundary Safe Bridge

Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.

Based on the WFGY project: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY

Instructions

1. **Analyze Bridge Request**

  • Parse target concept from "$TARGET"
  • Determine current semantic position
  • Calculate direct ΔS to target
  • If ΔS > 0.85, bridging is required
  • Load knowledge map for pathfinding

2. **Search for Bridge Nodes**

  • Query semantic tree for intermediate concepts
  • Find nodes with:
  • ΔS < 0.4 from current position
  • ΔS < 0.4 from target position
  • Logical connection to both endpoints
  • Rank bridges by:
  • Total path distance
  • Number of hops required
  • Historical success rate
  • Logic coherence

3. **Construct Bridge Paths**

  • **Single Bridge**: Current → Bridge → Target
  • **Multi-Bridge**: Current → B1 → B2 → ... → Target
  • For each path segment:
  • Verify ΔS < 0.4 (stay in safe zone)
  • Check logic consistency
  • Confirm knowledge exists
  • Calculate path metrics:
  • Total semantic distance
  • Maximum ΔS in path
  • Confidence level
  • Estimated reasoning steps

4. **Validate Bridge Safety**

  • Simulate path traversal
  • Check each hop for:
  • Knowledge boundary violations
  • Logic contradictions
  • Confidence degradation
  • Mark unsafe segments
  • Propose alternatives if needed

5. **Generate Bridge Plan**

  • Detailed step-by-step navigation
  • Reasoning required at each step
  • Checkpoints for validation
  • Fallback options
  • Success criteria

Output Format

SEMANTIC BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
═══════════════════════════════════════
Current Position: [concept]
Target: "$TARGET"
Direct Distance (ΔS): [value] [Safe/Unsafe]

Bridge Analysis:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Bridge Required: [Yes/No]
Reason: [Direct path crosses danger zone]

Available Bridge Paths:
────────────────────────────────────────

PATH 1 (Recommended):
[Current: Database Design]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.35 ✓
[Bridge 1: Data Structures]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.38 ✓
[Bridge 2: Algorithms]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.32 ✓
[Target: Machine Learning]

Total Distance: 1.05
Max Hop ΔS: 0.38
Confidence: 85%
Estimated Steps: 3

PATH 2 (Alternative):
[Current: Database Design]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.42 ✓
[Bridge: Statistics]
    ↓ ΔS: 0.45 ⚠️ 
[Target: Machine Learning]

Total Distance: 0.87
Max Hop ΔS: 0.45
Confidence: 72%
Estimated Steps: 2

PATH 3 (Longest but Safest):
[Current] → [B1] → [B2] → [B3] → [Target]
Total Distance: 1.43
Max Hop ΔS: 0.28
Confidence: 92%
Estimated Steps: 4

Bridge Concepts Identified:
1. [Concept]: Connects via [relationship]
2. [Concept]: Shares [common element]
3. [Concept]: Logical progression through [path]

Reasoning Strategy:
Step 1: From [Current], establish [connection]
Step 2: Transition to [Bridge] by [method]
Step 3: Link [Bridge] to [Target] via [relationship]

Safety Validation:
✓ All hops within safe zone (ΔS < 0.4)
✓ No logic contradictions detected
✓ Knowledge verified at each point
✓ Confidence maintained above 70%

Execution Plan:
1. Build understanding of [Bridge 1]
   Command: /semantic:node-build "[Bridge 1]"
   
2. Establish connection to [Bridge 2]
   Command: /wfgy:bbmc "[Bridge 2] relation"
   
3. Final leap to target
   Command: /wfgy:formula-all "$TARGET"

Risk Assessment:
- Success Probability: [percentage]%
- Fallback Available: [Yes/No]
- Recovery Point: [checkpoint]

Proceed with Bridge? [Execute/Modify/Cancel]

Bridge Types

Direct Bridge

Single intermediate concept

Current ──0.3──> Bridge ──0.3──> Target

Chain Bridge

Multiple connected concepts

Current ──> B1 ──> B2 ──> B3 ──> Target

Parallel Bridge

Multiple path options

Current ──> B1 ──> Target
    └────> B2 ──┘

Recursive Bridge

Return to strengthen connection

Current ──> Bridge ──> Current ──> Target

Bridge Selection Criteria

1. **Safety First**: Max ΔS < 0.4 2. **Efficiency**: Minimum total distance 3. **Reliability**: High confidence path 4. **Simplicity**: Fewer hops preferred 5. **Familiarity**: Use known concepts

Advanced Options

# Find multiple bridge options
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --paths 5

# Prefer shortest path
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --optimize distance

# Prefer safest path
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --optimize safety

# Auto-execute bridge
/boundary:safe-bridge "target" --auto-execute

Integration

Bridge construction works with:

  • `/boundary:detect` to verify positions
  • `/semantic:node-build` to create bridge nodes
  • `/wfgy:formula-all` for bridge reasoning
  • `/memory:checkpoint` before risky bridges
Read more
Ships withclaude-command-suite

A comprehensive development toolkit designed following Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices for AI-assisted software development.

Get the whole plugin