boundary-bbcr-fallback
Execute automatic BBCR (Collapse-Rebirth Correction) when knowledge boundaries are exceeded or reasoning fails.
Execute parallel reasoning exploration across multiple solution paths to find optimal approaches.
$ npx -y skills add qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/reasoning-multi-pathContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Execute parallel reasoning exploration across multiple solution paths to find optimal approaches.
tools: - read - write - grep - bash arguments: $PROBLEM
Execute parallel reasoning exploration across multiple solution paths to find optimal approaches.
Based on the WFGY project: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY
1. **Initialize Multi-Path Setup**
2. **Generate Reasoning Paths**
3. **Evolve Paths Iteratively**
4. **Weight and Rank Paths**
5. **Synthesize Solutions**
MULTI-PATH REASONING ANALYSIS
═══════════════════════════════════════
Problem: "$PROBLEM"
Paths Explored: 5
Iterations: [count]
Path Evolution:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Iteration
Path 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
────────────────────────────────────────
Path 1 ▪──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──● 85%
Path 2 ▪──○──●──●──●──●──●──●──○──○ 72%
Path 3 ▪──○──○──●──●──●──○──○──×──× Failed
Path 4 ▪──○──○──○──●──●──●──●──●──● 78%
Path 5 ▪──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──● 91%
Legend: ▪ Start ○ Exploring ● Promising × Failed
Top 3 Solution Paths:
────────────────────────────────────────
PATH 5 (Best) - Score: 0.91
Approach: [Contrarian/Inverse thinking]
Key Insight: [Main discovery]
Reasoning: [Brief explanation]
Confidence: 91%
PATH 1 - Score: 0.85
Approach: [Direct logical analysis]
Key Insight: [Main discovery]
Reasoning: [Brief explanation]
Confidence: 85%
PATH 4 - Score: 0.78
Approach: [Analogical comparison]
Key Insight: [Main discovery]
Reasoning: [Brief explanation]
Confidence: 78%
Convergent Findings:
• All paths agree: [Common conclusion 1]
• 4/5 paths suggest: [Common conclusion 2]
• Majority indicates: [Common conclusion 3]
Divergent Possibilities:
• Path 2 uniquely suggests: [Alternative]
• Path 5 contrarian view: [Opposite angle]
Synthesized Solution:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Weighted combination of successful paths]
[Incorporating insights from all approaches]
[Final recommended solution]
Confidence: [weighted average]%
Risk Assessment: [Low/Medium/High]
Alternative Approaches:
1. If [condition], consider Path 2
2. If [constraint], prefer Path 4
3. For [scenario], Path 1 is optimal
Path Statistics:
- Average Convergence: [value]
- Cross-Path Correlation: [value]
- Solution Stability: [value]{
"num_paths": 5,
"max_iterations": 10,
"divergence_factor": 0.3,
"pruning_threshold": 0.1,
"selection_pressure": 0.2,
"crossover_rate": 0.15
}# Explore more paths /reasoning:multi-path "problem" --paths 10 # Focus on creative solutions /reasoning:multi-path "problem" --emphasize creative # Quick exploration /reasoning:multi-path "problem" --iterations 5 # Deep exploration /reasoning:multi-path "problem" --iterations 20
Multi-path reasoning works with:
A comprehensive development toolkit designed following Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices for AI-assisted software development.
Repo: qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite
Execute automatic BBCR (Collapse-Rebirth Correction) when knowledge boundaries are exceeded or reasoning fails.
Analyze semantic position relative to knowledge boundaries to prevent hallucination and identify uncertainty zones.
Generate a visual heatmap of knowledge boundaries showing safe zones, risk areas, and semantic coverage.
Evaluate the current risk level and provide detailed analysis of potential hallucination or reasoning failure.
Find and construct semantic bridges to safely navigate from current position to target concept without crossing dangerous boundaries.
Takes an input prompt and returns ONLY a token-optimized version that preserves meaning while minimizing token count. Based on LLM tokenization principles:…