Skip to content
Development
Command

/decision-tree-explorer

Explore decision branches with probability weighting, expected value analysis, and scenario-based optimization.

From plugin
claude-command-suite
1.3k199 skills89 agents199 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/decision-tree-explorer

Context preview

What this command does when you run it.

Explore decision branches with probability weighting, expected value analysis, and scenario-based optimization.

Command definition

decision-tree-explorer.md

Decision Tree Explorer

Explore decision branches with probability weighting, expected value analysis, and scenario-based optimization.

Instructions

You are tasked with creating a comprehensive decision tree analysis to explore complex decision scenarios and optimize choice outcomes. Follow this systematic approach: **$ARGUMENTS**

1. Prerequisites Assessment

**Critical Decision Context Validation:**

  • **Decision Scope**: What specific decision(s) need to be made?
  • **Stakeholders**: Who will be affected by and involved in this decision?
  • **Time Constraints**: What are the decision deadlines and implementation timelines?
  • **Success Criteria**: How will you measure decision success or failure?
  • **Resource Constraints**: What limitations affect available options?

**If any context is unclear, guide systematically:**

Missing Decision Scope:
"I need clarity on the decision you're analyzing. Please specify:
- Primary Decision: The main choice you need to make
- Decision Level: Strategic, tactical, or operational
- Decision Type: Go/no-go, resource allocation, priority ranking, or option selection
- Alternative Options: What choices are you considering?

Examples:
- Strategic: 'Should we enter the European market next year?'
- Investment: 'Which of 3 product features should we build first?'
- Operational: 'Should we migrate to microservices or improve the monolith?'
- Crisis: 'How should we respond to the new competitor launch?'"

Missing Success Criteria:
"How will you evaluate if this decision was successful?
- Financial Metrics: Revenue impact, cost savings, ROI targets
- Strategic Metrics: Market share, competitive position, capability building
- Operational Metrics: Efficiency gains, quality improvements, risk reduction
- Timeline Metrics: Speed to market, implementation time, payback period"

Missing Resource Context:
"What constraints limit your decision options?
- Budget: Available investment capital and operating funds
- Time: Implementation deadlines and resource availability windows
- Capabilities: Team skills, technology infrastructure, operational capacity
- Regulatory: Compliance requirements and approval processes"

2. Decision Architecture Mapping

**Structure the decision systematically:**

Decision Hierarchy

  • Primary decision point and core question
  • Secondary decisions that follow from primary choice
  • Tertiary decisions and implementation details
  • Decision dependencies and sequencing requirements
  • Option combinations and interaction effects

Stakeholder Impact Analysis

  • Decision makers and approval authorities
  • Implementation teams and resource owners
  • Customers and end users affected
  • External partners and dependencies
  • Competitive landscape implications

Constraint Identification

  • Hard constraints (cannot be violated)
  • Soft constraints (preferences and trade-offs)
  • Temporal constraints (timing and sequencing)
  • Resource constraints (budget, capacity, capabilities)
  • Regulatory and compliance constraints

3. Option Generation and Structuring

**Systematically identify and organize decision alternatives:**

Comprehensive Option Development

  • Direct approaches to achieving the goal
  • Hybrid solutions combining multiple approaches
  • Phased approaches with incremental implementation
  • Alternative goals that might better serve needs
  • "Do nothing" baseline for comparison

Option Categorization

  • Quick wins vs. long-term strategic moves
  • High-risk/high-reward vs. safe/incremental options
  • Resource-intensive vs. lean approaches
  • Internal development vs. external partnerships
  • Proven approaches vs. innovative experiments

Option Feasibility Assessment

For each option, evaluate:
- Technical Feasibility: Can this actually be implemented?
- Economic Feasibility: Do benefits justify costs?
- Operational Feasibility: Do we have capability to execute?
- Timeline Feasibility: Can this be done in available time?
- Political Feasibility: Will stakeholders support this?

Feasibility Scoring (1-10 scale):
Option: [name]
- Technical: [score] - [reasoning]
- Economic: [score] - [reasoning]
- Operational: [score] - [reasoning]
- Timeline: [score] - [reasoning]
- Political: [score] - [reasoning]
Overall Feasibility: [average score]

4. Probability Assessment Framework

**Apply systematic probability estimation:**

Base Rate Analysis

  • Historical success rates for similar decisions
  • Industry benchmarks and comparative data
  • Expert judgment and domain knowledge
  • Market research and customer validation data
  • Internal capability assessment and track record

Scenario Probability Weighting

  • Best case scenario probabilities (optimistic outcomes)
  • Most likely scenario probabilities (base case expectations)
  • Worst case scenario probabilities (pessimistic outcomes)
  • Black swan event probabilities (extreme scenarios)
  • Competitive response probabilities

Probability Calibration Methods

Use multiple estimation approaches:

1. Historical Data Analysis:
   - Similar past decisions and outcomes
   - Success/failure rates in comparable situations
   - Market adoption patterns for similar offerings

2. Expert Consultation:
   - Domain expert probability estimates
   - Cross-functional team input and perspectives
   - External advisor and consultant insights

3. Market Validation:
   - Customer research and feedback
   - Competitive analysis and market dynamics
   - Regulatory and environmental factor assessment

4. Monte Carlo Simulation:
   - Run multiple probability scenarios
   - Test sensitivity to assumption changes
   - Generate confidence intervals for estimates

5. Expected Value Calculation

**Quantify decision outcomes systematically:**

Outcome Quantification

  • Financial returns and cost implications
  • Strategic value and competitive advantages
  • Risk reduction and option value creation
  • Time savings and efficiency improvements
  • Learning value and capability building

##

Read more
Ships withclaude-command-suite

A comprehensive development toolkit designed following Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices for AI-assisted software development.

Get the whole plugin