/identify-assumptions-existing
Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping.
One skill from pm-skills.
shell
$ npx -y skills add phuryn/pm-skills --skill identify-assumptions-existing --agent claude-codeInstalls just this skill. Get the whole plugin for auto-invocation.
How it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/identify-assumptions-existing
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping.
Stats
Stars24,321
Forks2,503
LicenseMIT
SKILL.md
identify-assumptions-existing.SKILL.md
--- name: identify-assumptions-existing description: "Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping." --- ## Identify Assumptions (Existing Product) Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas. ### Context You are stress-testing a feature idea for **$ARGUMENTS**. If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first. ### Instructions The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps: 1. **Think from three perspectives** about why this feature might fail: - **Product Manager perspective**: Business viability, market fit, strategic alignment - **Designer perspective**: Usability, user experience, adoption barriers - **Engineer perspective**: Technical feasibility, performance, integration challenges 2. **Identify assumptions across four risk areas**: - **Value**: Will it create value for customers? Does it solve a real problem? - **Usability**: Will users figure out how to use it? Is the learning curve acceptable? - **Viability**: Can marketing, sales, finance, and legal support it?