Skip to content
Development
Skill

/gate-tests

Audits test quality — assertion strength, boundary coverage, mock discipline, error path testing. Delegates to the tester agent for adversarial analysis. Internal gate — invoked by verify.

From plugin
specwright
923 skills9 agents18 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add Obsidian-Owl/specwright --skill gate-tests --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/gate-tests

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Audits test quality — assertion strength, boundary coverage, mock discipline, error path testing. Delegates to the tester agent for adversarial analysis. Internal gate — invoked by verify.

SKILL.md

gate-tests.SKILL.md
name: gate-tests
description: >-
  Audits test quality — assertion strength, boundary coverage, mock
  discipline, error path testing. Delegates to the tester agent for
  adversarial analysis. Internal gate — invoked by verify.
allowed-tools:
  - Read
  - Bash
  - Glob
  - Grep
  - Write
  - Task

Gate: Test Quality

Goal

Ensure tests are actually worth having. Passing tests that don't catch bugs are worse than no tests — they create false confidence. This gate audits test quality, not just pass/fail.

Inputs

  • `{projectArtifactsRoot}/config.json` -- test commands, project language
  • `{projectArtifactsRoot}/TESTING.md` -- testing strategy with boundary classifications (optional)
  • `{repoStateRoot}/work/{selectedWork.id}/workflow.json` -- selected work unit
  • Test files in the codebase

Outputs

  • Evidence file at `{workDir}/evidence/test-quality.md`
  • Gate status in the selected work's `workflow.json`
  • Findings organized by category with specific file:line references

Constraints

**Scope (MEDIUM freedom):**

  • Focus on test files related to the current work unit.
  • Identify test files via convention (test/, __tests__/, *.test.*, *.spec.*).

**Analysis (HIGH freedom):**

  • Delegate to `specwright-tester` agent for adversarial test quality review.
  • The tester evaluates against these quality dimensions:
  • **Assertion strength**: Are assertions specific? (`toBe(42)` vs `toBeDefined()`)
  • **Boundary coverage**: Are edge cases tested? (empty, null, max, negative)
  • **Mock discipline**: Are mocks justified? Are integration boundaries real?
  • **Error paths**: Are failure scenarios tested? (network down, invalid input)
  • **Behavior focus**: Do tests verify behavior or implementation details?
  • **Mutation resistance**: Tiered analysis (T1/T2/T3) stays inside this gate; missing tools route to T2/T3, never a silent skip.
  • **T1**: configured tool-backed mutation run. Report concrete file:line evidence plus mutation score or restricted survivor details when available: operator, location, before/after, defect category, and action.
  • **T2**: LLM-generated mutation check when zero applicable mutants make T1 uninformative or when the configured LLM fallback is the active path. Report concrete file:line evidence plus the same restricted survivor details: operator, location, before/after, defect category, and action.
  • **T3**: qualitative floor when T1 errors, T2 errors, or fallback unavailable would otherwise leave the gate blind. Audit the three bypass classes: hardcoded returns, partial implementations, boundary skips.
  • Honor accepted-mutant lineage through the shared approval record and config contract instead of silently waiving survivors.
  • **Boundary test approach**: Validate mock-vs-integration decisions against TESTING.md boundary classifications per `protocols/testing-strategy.md`. WARN if internal boundary is mocked. INFO if TESTING.md absent.
  • **Tier distribution**: For each AC tagged with `[tier: integration]`, `[tier: contract]`, or `[tier: e2e]`, check whether corresponding tests exist at that tier. Use heuristics: integration tests touch multiple modules and use real infrastructure (Testcontainers, real DB, httptest with real handler); contract tests validate schema or shape at a boundary; E2E tests exercise a full flow. Verdicts: non-unit ACs with matching tier tests that pass → PASS. Non-unit ACs with tier-appropriate tests that fail → BLOCK (forces user decision at gate). Non-unit ACs with only unit-tier tests → BLOCK. Zero non-unit ACs in spec → PASS (nothing to check). When no tier-tagged ACs exist and TESTING.md is absent → INFO (no data to validate, no false positives).
  • Each weakness is a finding with severity and file:line reference.

**Verdict (LOW freedom):**

  • Follow `protocols/evidence.md#verdict-rendering`.
  • BLOCK findings: tests that verify nothing (e.g., `expect(result).toBeDefined()` only).
  • WARN findings: missing edge cases, over-mocking, weak assertions.
  • INFO findings: style suggestions, naming improvements.

Protocol References

  • `protocols/evidence.md#verdict-rendering` -- verdict rendering
  • `protocols/evidence.md` -- evidence storage
  • `protocols/state.md` -- gate status updates
  • `protocols/delegation.md` -- tester agent delegation
  • `protocols/testing-strategy.md` -- boundary classifications for mock-vs-integration validation

Failure Modes

| Condition | Action | |-----------|--------| | No test files found | Gate FAIL: "No tests found for this work unit" | | Tester agent unavailable | Fall back to inline analysis (less thorough) | | Project has no test framework | Gate SKIP with note |

Read more
Ships withspecwright

Craft quality software with AI discipline. Spec-driven development plugin for Claude Code and Opencode — quality gates, adversarial testing, and evidence capture.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on specwright.