assessment
Assessment: read-only inspection, codebase overview, value analysis, health checks, ADR consultation, decision analysis,…
Plan multi-part content series: structure, cross-linking, cadence.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill series-planner -a windsurf -y
name: series-planner
promoted_to: content
description: "Plan multi-part content series: structure, cross-linking, cadence."
user-invocable: false
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Bash
- Grep
- Glob
- Edit
- Task
command: /series
routing:
triggers:
- "plan series"
- "multi-part content"
- "content series"
- "article series"
- "content arc"
category: content-creation
pairs_with:
- contentPlan multi-part content series: assess viability, select structure, produce plan with cross-linking and cadence. Three phases with strict gates.
| Signal | Load | Why | |---|---|---| | Publishing frequency, delay handling | `references/cadence-guidelines.md` | Schedule selection criteria | | Navigation links, Hugo implementation | `references/cross-linking.md` | Prev/next nav, shortcodes, landing pages | | Plan output format | `references/output-format.md` | Complete plan template | | Series types, selection matrix | `references/series-types.md` | Three type templates with examples |
/series [topic] /series --type=progressive [topic] # Force type /series --parts=5 [topic] # Target count /series --with-landing [topic] # Include landing page /series --minimal [topic] # Titles and scope only
Determine viability and natural divisions.
1. Analyze topic: scope (narrow/medium/broad), natural divisions, audience progression. 2. Check viability: minimum 3 distinct subtopics, each stands alone, logical progression exists, no filler. 3. Detect series type:
| Signal | Type | |--------|------| | learn, master, deep dive | Progressive Depth | | build, create, project | Chronological Build | | why we chose, migration, debugging | Problem Exploration |
**Gate**: 3+ natural divisions identified. If fewer, recommend single post or scope adjustment.
Select type, part count (strict 3-7 bounds), and structure.
1. Select type and justify. Define part count and word estimate. 2. Draft breakdown per part: title, scope (1 sentence), standalone value, adjacent links. 3. Validate standalone value for every part:
Red flags (reject): "read Part 1 first" dependency, mid-implementation endings, concepts only in earlier parts.
4. Select cadence (see `references/cadence-guidelines.md`). Default: weekly.
**Gate**: All parts pass standalone test. Part count 3-7. Type justified.
Produce the complete plan.
1. Build plan: series header, per-part breakdown, cross-linking (see `references/cross-linking.md`), publication dates, Hugo frontmatter. 2. Final validation checklist:
3. Output using `references/output-format.md` format.
**Gate**: All checks pass. Plan complete.
| Type | Structure | Reader flexibility | |------|-----------|-------------------| | **Progressive Depth** | Shallow to deep mastery | Beginners stop at Part 1; advanced skip ahead | | **Chronological Build** | Step-by-step creation | Each part produces working output | | **Problem Exploration** | Problem to solution journey | Even failed approaches are instructive |
| Error | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | Topic too narrow | Fewer than 3 natural divisions | Recommend single post or scope expansion | | Topic too broad | Would need 8+ parts | Split into multiple series; narrow scope | | No logical progression | Parts are loosely related, not building | Consider standalone posts instead of series | | Standalone value missing | Parts depend on each other | Merge dependent parts or add context inline |
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com. VexJoy Agent connects plain-English requests to specialist agents, skills, and workflows. /do selects the knowledge and tools needed for your task.
Assessment: read-only inspection, codebase overview, value analysis, health checks, ADR consultation, decision analysis,…
Business operations: strategy, technology, growth, competitive intelligence, support, finance, HR, legal, operations, sales,…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.