/winforms
Build, maintain, or modernize Windows Forms applications with practical guidance on designer-driven UI, event handling, data binding, MVP separation, and migration to modern .NET. USE FOR: working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications;
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill winforms --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/winforms
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Build, maintain, or modernize Windows Forms applications with practical guidance on designer-driven UI, event handling, data binding, MVP separation, and migration to modern .NET. USE FOR: working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications;
SKILL.md
winforms.SKILL.mdname: winforms
description: "Build, maintain, or modernize Windows Forms applications with practical guidance on designer-driven UI, event handling, data binding, MVP separation, and migration to modern .NET. USE FOR: working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications; migrating WinForms from .NET Framework to modern .NET; cleaning up oversized form code. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made."
compatibility: "Requires a Windows Forms project on .NET or .NET Framework."
Windows Forms
Trigger On
- working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications
- migrating WinForms from .NET Framework to modern .NET
- cleaning up oversized form code or designer coupling
- implementing data binding, validation, or control customization
Workflow
1. **Respect designer boundaries** — never edit `.Designer.cs` directly; changes are lost on regeneration. 2. **Separate business logic from forms** — use MVP (Model-View-Presenter) pattern. Forms orchestrate UI; presenters contain logic; services handle data access.
// View interface — forms implement this
public interface ICustomerView
{
string CustomerName { get; set; }
event EventHandler SaveRequested;
void ShowError(string message);
}
// Presenter — testable without UI
public class CustomerPresenter
{
private readonly ICustomerView _view;
private readonly ICustomerService _service;
public CustomerPresenter(ICustomerView view, ICustomerService service)
{
_view = view;
_service = service;
_view.SaveRequested += async (s, e) =>
{
try { await _service.SaveAsync(_view.CustomerName); }
catch (Exception ex) { _view.ShowError(ex.Message); }
};
}
}3. **Use DI from Program.cs** (.NET 6+):
var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddSingleton<ICustomerService, CustomerService>();
services.AddTransient<MainForm>();
using var sp = services.BuildServiceProvider();
Application.Run(sp.GetRequiredService<MainForm>());
4. **Use data binding** via `BindingSource` and `INotifyPropertyChanged` instead of manual control population. See [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md) for complete binding patterns. 5. **Use async/await** for I/O operations — disable controls during loading, use `Progress<T>` for progress reporting. Never block the UI thread. 6. **Validate with `ErrorProvider`** and the `Validating` event. Call `ValidateChildren()` before save operations. 7. **Modernize incrementally** — prefer better structure over big-bang rewrites. Use .NET 8+ features (button commands, stock icons) when available.
Current Upstream Notes
- The July 2026 Windows Forms overview refresh remains focused on Windows desktop, designer-driven controls, events, data binding, and migration to modern .NET. It does not change the framework-selection guidance: improve form boundaries and designer safety before proposing a rewrite.
- For docs-driven updates, validate whether the app targets .NET Framework, modern .NET, or mixed libraries before changing project format, designer files, or deployment assumptions.
flowchart LR
A["Form event"] --> B["Presenter handles logic"]
B --> C["Service layer / data access"]
C --> D["Update view via interface"]
D --> E["Validate and display results"]
Key Decisions
| Decision | Guidance | |----------|----------| | MVP vs MVVM | Prefer MVP for WinForms — simpler with event-driven model | | BindingSource vs manual | Always prefer BindingSource for list/detail binding | | Sync vs async I/O | Always async — use `async void` only for event handlers | | Custom controls | Extract reusable `UserControl` when form grows beyond ~300 lines | | .NET Framework → .NET | Use the official migration guide; validate designer compatibility first |
Deliver
- less brittle form code with clear UI/logic separation
- MVP pattern with testable presenters
- pragmatic modernization guidance for WinForms-heavy apps
- data binding and validation patterns that reduce manual wiring
Validate
- designer files stay stable and are not hand-edited
- forms are not acting as the application service layer
- async operations do not block the UI thread
- validation is implemented consistently with ErrorProvider
- Windows-only runtime behavior is tested on target
References
- [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md) - WinForms architectural patterns (MVP, MVVM, Passive View), data binding, validation, form communication, threading, DI setup, and .NET 8+ features
- [references/migration.md](references/migration.md) - step-by-step migration from .NET Framework to modern .NET, common issues, deployment options, and gradual migration strategies
Read more
name: winforms description: "Build, maintain, or modernize Windows Forms applications with practical guidance on designer-driven UI, event handling, data binding, MVP separation, and migration to modern .NET. USE FOR: working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications; migrating WinForms from .NET Framework to modern .NET; cleaning up oversized form code. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made." compatibility: "Requires a Windows Forms project on .NET or .NET Framework."
Windows Forms
Trigger On
- working on Windows Forms UI, event-driven workflows, or classic LOB applications
- migrating WinForms from .NET Framework to modern .NET
- cleaning up oversized form code or designer coupling
- implementing data binding, validation, or control customization
Workflow
1. **Respect designer boundaries** — never edit `.Designer.cs` directly; changes are lost on regeneration. 2. **Separate business logic from forms** — use MVP (Model-View-Presenter) pattern. Forms orchestrate UI; presenters contain logic; services handle data access.
// View interface — forms implement this
public interface ICustomerView
{
string CustomerName { get; set; }
event EventHandler SaveRequested;
void ShowError(string message);
}
// Presenter — testable without UI
public class CustomerPresenter
{
private readonly ICustomerView _view;
private readonly ICustomerService _service;
public CustomerPresenter(ICustomerView view, ICustomerService service)
{
_view = view;
_service = service;
_view.SaveRequested += async (s, e) =>
{
try { await _service.SaveAsync(_view.CustomerName); }
catch (Exception ex) { _view.ShowError(ex.Message); }
};
}
}3. **Use DI from Program.cs** (.NET 6+):
var services = new ServiceCollection(); services.AddSingleton<ICustomerService, CustomerService>(); services.AddTransient<MainForm>(); using var sp = services.BuildServiceProvider(); Application.Run(sp.GetRequiredService<MainForm>());
4. **Use data binding** via `BindingSource` and `INotifyPropertyChanged` instead of manual control population. See [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md) for complete binding patterns. 5. **Use async/await** for I/O operations — disable controls during loading, use `Progress<T>` for progress reporting. Never block the UI thread. 6. **Validate with `ErrorProvider`** and the `Validating` event. Call `ValidateChildren()` before save operations. 7. **Modernize incrementally** — prefer better structure over big-bang rewrites. Use .NET 8+ features (button commands, stock icons) when available.
Current Upstream Notes
- The July 2026 Windows Forms overview refresh remains focused on Windows desktop, designer-driven controls, events, data binding, and migration to modern .NET. It does not change the framework-selection guidance: improve form boundaries and designer safety before proposing a rewrite.
- For docs-driven updates, validate whether the app targets .NET Framework, modern .NET, or mixed libraries before changing project format, designer files, or deployment assumptions.
flowchart LR A["Form event"] --> B["Presenter handles logic"] B --> C["Service layer / data access"] C --> D["Update view via interface"] D --> E["Validate and display results"]
Key Decisions
| Decision | Guidance | |----------|----------| | MVP vs MVVM | Prefer MVP for WinForms — simpler with event-driven model | | BindingSource vs manual | Always prefer BindingSource for list/detail binding | | Sync vs async I/O | Always async — use `async void` only for event handlers | | Custom controls | Extract reusable `UserControl` when form grows beyond ~300 lines | | .NET Framework → .NET | Use the official migration guide; validate designer compatibility first |
Deliver
- less brittle form code with clear UI/logic separation
- MVP pattern with testable presenters
- pragmatic modernization guidance for WinForms-heavy apps
- data binding and validation patterns that reduce manual wiring
Validate
- designer files stay stable and are not hand-edited
- forms are not acting as the application service layer
- async operations do not block the UI thread
- validation is implemented consistently with ErrorProvider
- Windows-only runtime behavior is tested on target
References
- [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md) - WinForms architectural patterns (MVP, MVVM, Passive View), data binding, validation, form communication, threading, DI setup, and .NET 8+ features
- [references/migration.md](references/migration.md) - step-by-step migration from .NET Framework to modern .NET, common issues, deployment options, and gradual migration strategies
Stop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Other skills on dotnet-skills.
- /aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration,
Open skill - /aspire
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.4.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing, MCP, and deployment patterns for distributed apps. USE FOR: Aspire.AppHost.Sdk, Aspire.Hosting.*,
Open skill - /azure-functions
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable
Open skill - /blazor
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and hosting choices. USE FOR: building interactive web UIs with C# instead of JavaScript; choosing between Server, WebAssembly, or
Open skill - /entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access
Open skill - /entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and
Open skill

