aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on…
Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET. USE FOR: vectorizing scalar loops with TensorPrimitives, Vector64/128/256/512, or platform hardware intrinsics; reviewing existing SIMD code, including Vector<T>, for contract equivalence, tail handling, memory safety,
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill vectorization --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/vectorizationContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET. USE FOR: vectorizing scalar loops with TensorPrimitives, Vector64/128/256/512, or platform hardware intrinsics; reviewing existing SIMD code, including Vector<T>, for contract equivalence, tail handling, memory safety,
name: vectorization description: > Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET. USE FOR: vectorizing scalar loops with TensorPrimitives, Vector64/128/256/512, or platform hardware intrinsics; reviewing existing SIMD code, including Vector<T>, for contract equivalence, tail handling, memory safety, portability, fallbacks, and measured performance. DO NOT USE FOR: performance work unrelated to SIMD or vectorization. license: MIT
Produce a portable optimization that preserves the scalar contract, remains memory-safe at every length, and earns its complexity with measured results. **Read the official [SIMD and hardware-intrinsics guidance](https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/standard/simd) first** and follow its comprehensive implementation templates. In particular, use its self-contained per-width dispatch, dedicated small-input handling, loop, and remainder shapes rather than reducing them to a chain of width checks. This skill supplies the decision rules and validation checks to apply while changing real code.
Discover these from the repository before asking the user:
| Input | Required | What to establish | | --- | --- | --- | | Scalar implementation and tests | Yes | Existing contract, representative call sites, and supported overlap | | Target frameworks and platforms | Yes | Available SIMD APIs and architectures that must behave consistently | | Build and test workflow | Yes | The repository's normal commands and how to launch separate test processes | | Representative workload or benchmark | For optimization | Typical input sizes and the baseline to beat |
Do not add a package merely because an API exists there. First check the target framework and the project's existing dependency/versioning policy.
1. **Use the highest-level API that matches the contract, then stop.** `Span<T>` and `string` operations, `TensorPrimitives`, and tensor types already accelerate many operations. LINQ reductions such as `Sum`, `Min`, `Max`, and `Average` can also accelerate when the source exposes its underlying span. Verify empty-input and floating-point behavior rather than assuming similarly named operations are interchangeable. Once an existing API preserves the contract, use it instead of continuing into handwritten SIMD. Before writing an explicit loop, name the framework APIs considered and why none applies. Fixed-shape `System.Numerics` types remain appropriate for graphics and similar domains. 2. **Start new explicit SIMD loops with `Vector128<T>`.** It is accelerated across the broadest hardware set. Add wider fixed-width paths only when measurements justify them. 3. **Keep platforms consistent.** Prefer cross-platform operations on the fixed-width vector types; they lower to the appropriate target instructions. For example, `(vector & mask) == Vector128<byte>.Zero` becomes `ptest` on x86/x64. Use architecture-specific intrinsics only for a measured gap, guard them with `IsSupported`, and retain equivalent portable or scalar behavior. 4. **Read `IsHardwareAccelerated`, `IsSupported`, and `Count` directly.** The JIT treats them as constants, so caching them adds no value and obscures which branches disappear. 5. **Prefer operators where they are clear.** Parenthesize expressions that mix bitwise and comparison operators so precedence is explicit.
If the task is review-only, do not rewrite the code. Report correctness and memory-safety defects before performance opportunities.
ordering, and exceptions before changing the implementation.
probe the highest-level candidate API with the required edge cases. A small contract adapter, such as preserving special empty-input behavior, does not justify reimplementing the operation. If the API preserves the contract, use it and stop; do not claim it is unavailable without checking.
measurements justify wider paths, check `Vector512<T>`, then `Vector256<T>`, optional `Vector<T>`, `Vector128<T>`, and finally scalar. Omit paths the implementation does not need. Each outer fixed-width guard checks only its `IsHardwareAccelerated` property and, for generic element types, `IsSupported`. Inside that block, run the width-specific helper when the input has at least `Count` elements; otherwise run a dedicated small-input helper, then return. Do not put the length check in the outer guard and fall through to repeat dispatch at narrower widths. Keeping each supported-width block self-contained lets the JIT remove unsupported blocks and avoids redundant work on common small inputs.
efficient and they require no pinning or reference arithmetic. Unsafe loads and stores are largely unnecessary. When a path genuinely must walk a buffer by managed reference, use the element-offset `LoadUnsafe(ref T, nuint)` and `StoreUnsafe` overloads rather than pointers or manually advanced references.
`MemoryMarshal.GetReference(span)` or `MemoryMarshal.GetArrayDataReference(array)`, not by indexing element `0`.
not `char` or `bool`. Reinterpret with `MemoryMarshal.Cast` or `As<TFrom, TTo>`; reinterpretation changes only the type, not the bits. Keep Boolean data as `0` or `1` and characters as valid UTF-16, normalizing results before storing when necessary.
Stop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on…
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.5.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing,…
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR:…
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and…
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE…
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET…