/resolve-project-references
Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill resolve-project-references --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/resolve-project-references
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent
SKILL.md
resolve-project-references.SKILL.mdname: resolve-project-references
description: "Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead."
license: MIT
Misleading ResolveProjectReferences Time
Prevent misguided optimization of `ResolveProjectReferences` by explaining that its reported time is wall-clock wait time, not CPU work.
When to Use
- `ResolveProjectReferences` appears as the most expensive target in the Target Performance Summary
- A developer is trying to optimize `ResolveProjectReferences` directly
- Build performance analysis shows a single target consuming 50-80% of total build time
When Not to Use
- General build performance optimization (use `build-perf-diagnostics` instead)
- The bottleneck is clearly a different target (e.g., `Csc`, `ResolveAssemblyReference`)
- The user has not yet captured a binlog or performance summary
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | Build log or binlog | Yes | A diagnostic build log or binlog containing the Target Performance Summary |
Workflow
Step 1: Confirm the misleading symptom
Verify that `ResolveProjectReferences` appears as the top target in the **Target** Performance Summary. This is the misleading metric.
Step 2: Explain why it is misleading
The reported time includes **waiting for dependent projects to build** while the MSBuild node is yielded (see dotnet/msbuild#3135). During this wait, the node may be doing useful work on other projects. The target itself does very little work.
Step 3: Redirect to task self-time
Use the **Task** Performance Summary to identify the real bottleneck.
Primary: binlog MCP (preferred)
Use the **binlog MCP server** expensive_tasks tool to get task self-time rankings directly from the binlog.
Fallback: text-log replay (when MCP is unavailable)
dotnet msbuild build.binlog -noconlog -fl "-flp:v=diag;logfile=full.log;performancesummary"
grep "Task Performance Summary" -A 50 full.log
Focus on self-time of actual tasks:
- **Csc**: see `build-perf-diagnostics` skill (Section 2: Roslyn Analyzers)
- **ResolveAssemblyReference**: see `build-perf-diagnostics` skill (Section 1: RAR)
- **Copy**: see `build-perf-diagnostics` skill (Section 4: File I/O)
- **Serialization bottlenecks**: see `build-parallelism` skill
Validation
- [ ] Task Performance Summary was used instead of Target Performance Summary
- [ ] `ResolveProjectReferences` was not set as the optimization target
- [ ] A concrete task (e.g., `Csc`, `Copy`, `ResolveAssemblyReference`) was identified as the true bottleneck
Read more
name: resolve-project-references description: "Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead." license: MIT
Misleading ResolveProjectReferences Time
Prevent misguided optimization of `ResolveProjectReferences` by explaining that its reported time is wall-clock wait time, not CPU work.
When to Use
- `ResolveProjectReferences` appears as the most expensive target in the Target Performance Summary
- A developer is trying to optimize `ResolveProjectReferences` directly
- Build performance analysis shows a single target consuming 50-80% of total build time
When Not to Use
- General build performance optimization (use `build-perf-diagnostics` instead)
- The bottleneck is clearly a different target (e.g., `Csc`, `ResolveAssemblyReference`)
- The user has not yet captured a binlog or performance summary
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | Build log or binlog | Yes | A diagnostic build log or binlog containing the Target Performance Summary |
Workflow
Step 1: Confirm the misleading symptom
Verify that `ResolveProjectReferences` appears as the top target in the **Target** Performance Summary. This is the misleading metric.
Step 2: Explain why it is misleading
The reported time includes **waiting for dependent projects to build** while the MSBuild node is yielded (see dotnet/msbuild#3135). During this wait, the node may be doing useful work on other projects. The target itself does very little work.
Step 3: Redirect to task self-time
Use the **Task** Performance Summary to identify the real bottleneck.
Primary: binlog MCP (preferred)
Use the **binlog MCP server** expensive_tasks tool to get task self-time rankings directly from the binlog.
Fallback: text-log replay (when MCP is unavailable)
dotnet msbuild build.binlog -noconlog -fl "-flp:v=diag;logfile=full.log;performancesummary" grep "Task Performance Summary" -A 50 full.log
Focus on self-time of actual tasks:
- **Csc**: see `build-perf-diagnostics` skill (Section 2: Roslyn Analyzers)
- **ResolveAssemblyReference**: see `build-perf-diagnostics` skill (Section 1: RAR)
- **Copy**: see `build-perf-diagnostics` skill (Section 4: File I/O)
- **Serialization bottlenecks**: see `build-parallelism` skill
Validation
- [ ] Task Performance Summary was used instead of Target Performance Summary
- [ ] `ResolveProjectReferences` was not set as the optimization target
- [ ] A concrete task (e.g., `Csc`, `Copy`, `ResolveAssemblyReference`) was identified as the true bottleneck
Stop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Other skills on dotnet-skills.
- /aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration,
Open skill - /aspire
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.4.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing, MCP, and deployment patterns for distributed apps. USE FOR: Aspire.AppHost.Sdk, Aspire.Hosting.*,
Open skill - /azure-functions
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable
Open skill - /blazor
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and hosting choices. USE FOR: building interactive web UIs with C# instead of JavaScript; choosing between Server, WebAssembly, or
Open skill - /entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access
Open skill - /entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and
Open skill

