/profiling
Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill profiling --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/profiling
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception
SKILL.md
profiling.SKILL.mdname: profiling
description: "Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing realistic performance tests or load tests with ad-hoc tracing alone; production heap collection when the pause risk has not been. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made."
compatibility: "Requires a .NET app or process to inspect; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first."
.NET Profiling
Trigger On
- the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application
- the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock contention, or startup diagnostics
- the team wants official CLI-based diagnostics without depending on `dnx`
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- replacing realistic performance tests or load tests with ad-hoc tracing alone
- production heap collection when the pause risk has not been accepted
- GUI-only workflows that the repo cannot automate or document
Inputs
- the nearest `AGENTS.md`
- target application, process, or startup path
- the symptom being investigated: CPU, memory, GC, contention, exceptions, or startup
Quick Start
1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
1. Build and run a realistic target first:
- prefer `Release`
- prefer realistic config, inputs, and data volume
2. Start with the lightest useful tool:
- `dotnet-counters` for live health signals
- `dotnet-trace` for CPU, exception, contention, GC, and startup traces
- `dotnet-gcdump` for managed heap inspection when memory shape matters
3. Prefer installed CLI tools over `dnx` one-shot execution so the repo commands stay stable and reproducible. 4. Capture one focused profile at a time instead of mixing every signal into one run. 5. For CPU and general runtime hotspots, start with `dotnet-trace collect`. 6. For live triage, start with `dotnet-counters monitor` on `System.Runtime`. 7. For heap analysis, use `dotnet-gcdump` carefully and document the pause risk. 8. After each change, rerun the same measurement path and compare before versus after.
Bootstrap When Missing
If official .NET profiling tools are not available yet:
1. Detect current state:
- `dotnet --info`
- `dotnet tool list --global`
- `command -v dotnet-counters`
- `command -v dotnet-trace`
- `command -v dotnet-gcdump`
2. Choose the install path deliberately:
- preferred machine-level install:
- `dotnet tool install --global dotnet-counters`
- `dotnet tool install --global dotnet-trace`
- `dotnet tool install --global dotnet-gcdump`
- direct-download fallback when global tools are not suitable:
- use the official Microsoft Learn download links for `dotnet-counters`, `dotnet-trace`, and `dotnet-gcdump`
3. Verify the installed tools resolve correctly:
- `dotnet-counters --version`
- `dotnet-trace --version`
- `dotnet-gcdump --version`
4. Record exact profiling commands in `AGENTS.md`, for example:
- `dotnet-counters monitor --process-id PID --counters System.Runtime`
- `dotnet-trace collect --process-id PID --profile dotnet-common,dotnet-sampled-thread-time -o trace.nettrace`
- `dotnet-gcdump collect --process-id PID --output heap.gcdump`
5. Run one bounded command and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If the repo intentionally standardizes on another profiling stack and does not want these tools, return `status: not_applicable`.
Deliver
- explicit official .NET profiling commands
- a clear profiling path for CPU, counters, and heap inspection
- reproducible diagnostics commands that humans and agents can rerun
Validate
- the chosen tool matches the actual symptom
- commands target a realistic process and configuration
- before/after comparisons use the same scenario
- heap collection warnings are explicit when `dotnet-gcdump` is used
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
1. Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
- `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
- `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
- `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
- `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
- `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
- `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
Load References
- [references/commands.md](references/commands.md)
- [references/patterns.md](references/
Read more
name: profiling description: "Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing realistic performance tests or load tests with ad-hoc tracing alone; production heap collection when the pause risk has not been. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made." compatibility: "Requires a .NET app or process to inspect; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first."
.NET Profiling
Trigger On
- the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application
- the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock contention, or startup diagnostics
- the team wants official CLI-based diagnostics without depending on `dnx`
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- replacing realistic performance tests or load tests with ad-hoc tracing alone
- production heap collection when the pause risk has not been accepted
- GUI-only workflows that the repo cannot automate or document
Inputs
- the nearest `AGENTS.md`
- target application, process, or startup path
- the symptom being investigated: CPU, memory, GC, contention, exceptions, or startup
Quick Start
1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
1. Build and run a realistic target first:
- prefer `Release`
- prefer realistic config, inputs, and data volume
2. Start with the lightest useful tool:
- `dotnet-counters` for live health signals
- `dotnet-trace` for CPU, exception, contention, GC, and startup traces
- `dotnet-gcdump` for managed heap inspection when memory shape matters
3. Prefer installed CLI tools over `dnx` one-shot execution so the repo commands stay stable and reproducible. 4. Capture one focused profile at a time instead of mixing every signal into one run. 5. For CPU and general runtime hotspots, start with `dotnet-trace collect`. 6. For live triage, start with `dotnet-counters monitor` on `System.Runtime`. 7. For heap analysis, use `dotnet-gcdump` carefully and document the pause risk. 8. After each change, rerun the same measurement path and compare before versus after.
Bootstrap When Missing
If official .NET profiling tools are not available yet:
1. Detect current state:
- `dotnet --info`
- `dotnet tool list --global`
- `command -v dotnet-counters`
- `command -v dotnet-trace`
- `command -v dotnet-gcdump`
2. Choose the install path deliberately:
- preferred machine-level install:
- `dotnet tool install --global dotnet-counters`
- `dotnet tool install --global dotnet-trace`
- `dotnet tool install --global dotnet-gcdump`
- direct-download fallback when global tools are not suitable:
- use the official Microsoft Learn download links for `dotnet-counters`, `dotnet-trace`, and `dotnet-gcdump`
3. Verify the installed tools resolve correctly:
- `dotnet-counters --version`
- `dotnet-trace --version`
- `dotnet-gcdump --version`
4. Record exact profiling commands in `AGENTS.md`, for example:
- `dotnet-counters monitor --process-id PID --counters System.Runtime`
- `dotnet-trace collect --process-id PID --profile dotnet-common,dotnet-sampled-thread-time -o trace.nettrace`
- `dotnet-gcdump collect --process-id PID --output heap.gcdump`
5. Run one bounded command and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If the repo intentionally standardizes on another profiling stack and does not want these tools, return `status: not_applicable`.
Deliver
- explicit official .NET profiling commands
- a clear profiling path for CPU, counters, and heap inspection
- reproducible diagnostics commands that humans and agents can rerun
Validate
- the chosen tool matches the actual symptom
- commands target a realistic process and configuration
- before/after comparisons use the same scenario
- heap collection warnings are explicit when `dotnet-gcdump` is used
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
1. Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
- `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
- `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
- `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
- `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
- `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
- `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
Load References
- [references/commands.md](references/commands.md)
- [references/patterns.md](references/
Stop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Other skills on dotnet-skills.
- /aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration,
Open skill - /aspire
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.4.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing, MCP, and deployment patterns for distributed apps. USE FOR: Aspire.AppHost.Sdk, Aspire.Hosting.*,
Open skill - /azure-functions
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable
Open skill - /blazor
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and hosting choices. USE FOR: building interactive web UIs with C# instead of JavaScript; choosing between Server, WebAssembly, or
Open skill - /entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access
Open skill - /entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and
Open skill

