/complexity
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill complexity --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/complexity
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling
SKILL.md
complexity.SKILL.mdname: complexity
description: "Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made."
compatibility: "Requires a .NET SDK-based repository; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first."
.NET Complexity Review
Trigger On
- the team wants to find overly complex methods
- cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI
- maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- formatting-only work
- generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change
Inputs
- the nearest `AGENTS.md`
- current analyzer settings
- current maintainability limits
Quick Start
1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
1. Start with the built-in maintainability analyzers before reaching for non-standard tooling. 2. Use these rules deliberately:
- `CA1502` for excessive cyclomatic complexity in methods
- `CA1505` for low maintainability index
- `CA1506` for excessive class coupling
- `CA1501` when inheritance depth is also part of the design problem
3. Keep rule severity in the root `.editorconfig`. 4. Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in `CodeMetricsConfig.txt` added as `AdditionalFiles`. 5. Pair analyzer findings with MCAF maintainability limits in `AGENTS.md`.
Bootstrap When Missing
If complexity thresholds are not configured yet:
1. Detect current state:
- `rg -n "CA1501|CA1502|CA1505|CA1506|CodeMetricsConfig" -g '.editorconfig' -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .`
- `rg --files -g 'CodeMetricsConfig.txt'`
2. Add severity entries for `CA1502`, `CA1505`, `CA1506`, and `CA1501` in root `.editorconfig`. 3. Add checked-in `CodeMetricsConfig.txt` and include it as `AdditionalFiles` in project props. 4. Keep maintainability limits aligned with `AGENTS.md`. 5. Run `dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT` and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If policy relies only on `AGENTS.md` limits with no analyzer gate by design, return `status: not_applicable`.
Deliver
- explicit complexity and maintainability policy
- checked-in metric thresholds
- CI commands that surface complex methods early
Validate
- method-complexity checks are enabled where the repo wants them
- thresholds are versioned in repo, not held in IDE memory
- complexity findings map to real refactoring decisions
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
1. Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
- `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
- `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
- `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
- `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
- `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
- `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
Load References
- [references/complexity.md](references/complexity.md)
- [references/metrics.md](references/metrics.md)
- [references/config.md](references/config.md)
Example Requests
- "Which analyzer finds complex methods in .NET?"
- "Add a complexity gate for our C# code."
- "Configure cyclomatic complexity thresholds."
Read more
name: complexity description: "Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made." compatibility: "Requires a .NET SDK-based repository; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first."
.NET Complexity Review
Trigger On
- the team wants to find overly complex methods
- cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI
- maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- formatting-only work
- generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change
Inputs
- the nearest `AGENTS.md`
- current analyzer settings
- current maintainability limits
Quick Start
1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
1. Start with the built-in maintainability analyzers before reaching for non-standard tooling. 2. Use these rules deliberately:
- `CA1502` for excessive cyclomatic complexity in methods
- `CA1505` for low maintainability index
- `CA1506` for excessive class coupling
- `CA1501` when inheritance depth is also part of the design problem
3. Keep rule severity in the root `.editorconfig`. 4. Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in `CodeMetricsConfig.txt` added as `AdditionalFiles`. 5. Pair analyzer findings with MCAF maintainability limits in `AGENTS.md`.
Bootstrap When Missing
If complexity thresholds are not configured yet:
1. Detect current state:
- `rg -n "CA1501|CA1502|CA1505|CA1506|CodeMetricsConfig" -g '.editorconfig' -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .`
- `rg --files -g 'CodeMetricsConfig.txt'`
2. Add severity entries for `CA1502`, `CA1505`, `CA1506`, and `CA1501` in root `.editorconfig`. 3. Add checked-in `CodeMetricsConfig.txt` and include it as `AdditionalFiles` in project props. 4. Keep maintainability limits aligned with `AGENTS.md`. 5. Run `dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT` and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If policy relies only on `AGENTS.md` limits with no analyzer gate by design, return `status: not_applicable`.
Deliver
- explicit complexity and maintainability policy
- checked-in metric thresholds
- CI commands that surface complex methods early
Validate
- method-complexity checks are enabled where the repo wants them
- thresholds are versioned in repo, not held in IDE memory
- complexity findings map to real refactoring decisions
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
1. Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
- `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
- `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
- `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
- `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
- `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
- `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
Load References
- [references/complexity.md](references/complexity.md)
- [references/metrics.md](references/metrics.md)
- [references/config.md](references/config.md)
Example Requests
- "Which analyzer finds complex methods in .NET?"
- "Add a complexity gate for our C# code."
- "Configure cyclomatic complexity thresholds."
Stop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Other skills on dotnet-skills.
- /aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration,
Open skill - /aspire
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.4.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing, MCP, and deployment patterns for distributed apps. USE FOR: Aspire.AppHost.Sdk, Aspire.Hosting.*,
Open skill - /azure-functions
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable
Open skill - /blazor
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and hosting choices. USE FOR: building interactive web UIs with C# instead of JavaScript; choosing between Server, WebAssembly, or
Open skill - /entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access
Open skill - /entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and
Open skill

