/analyzer-config
Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership
$ npx -y skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill analyzer-config --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/analyzer-config
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership
SKILL.md
analyzer-config.SKILL.mdname: analyzer-config
description: "Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear; the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: choosing analyzers with no config change; formatting-only execution with no config ownership question. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made."
compatibility: "Requires a .NET SDK-based repository; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first."
.NET Analyzer Configuration
Trigger On
- the repo needs a root `.editorconfig`
- analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear
- the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- choosing analyzers with no config change
- formatting-only execution with no config ownership question
Inputs
- the nearest `AGENTS.md`
- current `.editorconfig`
- any `Directory.Build.props` overrides
Quick Start
1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
1. Prefer one repo-root `.editorconfig` with `root = true`. 2. Add nested `.editorconfig` files when a subtree has a clear scoped purpose, such as stricter rules, different generated-code handling, or a different policy for tests or legacy code. 3. Keep severity in `.editorconfig`, not scattered through IDE settings. 4. Write the file as real EditorConfig, not as a made-up `.NET` variant:
- lowercase filename `.editorconfig`
- `root = true` in the preamble
- no inline comments
- forward slashes in globs
5. Keep bulk switches such as `EnableNETAnalyzers` in MSBuild files, not in `.editorconfig`. 6. Treat `.globalconfig` as an exceptional case, not the normal repo setup.
Bootstrap When Missing
If analyzer configuration is requested but not structured yet:
1. Detect current state:
- `rg --files -g '.editorconfig' -g '.globalconfig'`
- `rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .`
2. Create or normalize one repo-root `.editorconfig` with `root = true`. 3. Move rule severity into `.editorconfig` and keep bulk analyzer switches in project or MSBuild config. 4. Add nested `.editorconfig` files only when a subtree really needs different scoped policy. 5. Run `dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT` and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If the repo intentionally uses another documented analyzer-config ownership model, return `status: not_applicable`.
Deliver
- one explicit analyzer configuration ownership model
- a root `.editorconfig` layout that agents can extend safely
Validate
- rule severity is reproducible in local and CI builds
- IDE-only settings do not silently override repo policy
- the default path is a root `.editorconfig`, not a surprise alternative
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
1. Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
- `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
- `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
- `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
- `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
- `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
- `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
Load References
- [references/analyzer-config.md](references/analyzer-config.md)
- [references/template.md](references/template.md)
- [references/rules.md](references/rules.md)
Example Requests
- "Make `.editorconfig` the source of truth."
- "Write a proper root `.editorconfig` for this repo."
- "Fix conflicting analyzer severities in this .NET repo."
Read more
name: analyzer-config description: "Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. USE FOR: the repo needs a root .editorconfig; analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear; the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: choosing analyzers with no config change; formatting-only execution with no config ownership question. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made." compatibility: "Requires a .NET SDK-based repository; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first."
.NET Analyzer Configuration
Trigger On
- the repo needs a root `.editorconfig`
- analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear
- the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- choosing analyzers with no config change
- formatting-only execution with no config ownership question
Inputs
- the nearest `AGENTS.md`
- current `.editorconfig`
- any `Directory.Build.props` overrides
Quick Start
1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints. 2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable. 3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
1. Prefer one repo-root `.editorconfig` with `root = true`. 2. Add nested `.editorconfig` files when a subtree has a clear scoped purpose, such as stricter rules, different generated-code handling, or a different policy for tests or legacy code. 3. Keep severity in `.editorconfig`, not scattered through IDE settings. 4. Write the file as real EditorConfig, not as a made-up `.NET` variant:
- lowercase filename `.editorconfig`
- `root = true` in the preamble
- no inline comments
- forward slashes in globs
5. Keep bulk switches such as `EnableNETAnalyzers` in MSBuild files, not in `.editorconfig`. 6. Treat `.globalconfig` as an exceptional case, not the normal repo setup.
Bootstrap When Missing
If analyzer configuration is requested but not structured yet:
1. Detect current state:
- `rg --files -g '.editorconfig' -g '.globalconfig'`
- `rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .`
2. Create or normalize one repo-root `.editorconfig` with `root = true`. 3. Move rule severity into `.editorconfig` and keep bulk analyzer switches in project or MSBuild config. 4. Add nested `.editorconfig` files only when a subtree really needs different scoped policy. 5. Run `dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT` and return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 6. If the repo intentionally uses another documented analyzer-config ownership model, return `status: not_applicable`.
Deliver
- one explicit analyzer configuration ownership model
- a root `.editorconfig` layout that agents can extend safely
Validate
- rule severity is reproducible in local and CI builds
- IDE-only settings do not silently override repo policy
- the default path is a root `.editorconfig`, not a surprise alternative
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
1. Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta. 3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes. 4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps. 5. Update the plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
- `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
- `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
- `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
- `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
- `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
- `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
Load References
- [references/analyzer-config.md](references/analyzer-config.md)
- [references/template.md](references/template.md)
- [references/rules.md](references/rules.md)
Example Requests
- "Make `.editorconfig` the source of truth."
- "Write a proper root `.editorconfig` for this repo."
- "Fix conflicting analyzer severities in this .NET repo."
Stop explaining .NET to your AI. Start building. We've all been there: asking Claude to use Entity Framework, only to get EF6 patterns in a .NET 8 project. Explaining to Copilot that Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly aren't the same thing.
Repo: managedcode/dotnet-skills
Other skills on dotnet-skills.
- /aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration,
Open skill - /aspire
Build, upgrade, and operate Aspire 13.4.x C# or TypeScript application hosts with the current CLI, AppHost, ServiceDefaults, integrations, dashboard, testing, MCP, and deployment patterns for distributed apps. USE FOR: Aspire.AppHost.Sdk, Aspire.Hosting.*,
Open skill - /azure-functions
Build, review, or migrate Azure Functions in .NET with correct execution model, isolated worker setup, bindings, DI, and Durable Functions patterns. USE FOR: working on Azure Functions in .NET; migrating from the in-process model to the isolated worker model; adding Durable
Open skill - /blazor
Build and review Blazor applications across server, WebAssembly, web app, and hybrid scenarios with correct component design, state flow, rendering, and hosting choices. USE FOR: building interactive web UIs with C# instead of JavaScript; choosing between Server, WebAssembly, or
Open skill - /entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access
Open skill - /entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and
Open skill

