/validate-citations
验证研究文档中的引用准确性、完整性和质量
$ npx -y skills add liangdabiao/Claude-Code-Stock-Deep-Research-Agent --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/validate-citations
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
验证研究文档中的引用准确性、完整性和质量
Command definition
validate-citations.mddescription: 验证研究文档中的引用准确性、完整性和质量
argument-hint: [文件路径]
allowed-tools: Read, WebSearch, WebFetch, Write
Citation Validation
Verify all citations in a research document for accuracy, completeness, and quality.
File Path
$ARGUMENTS
Your Task
Use the **citation-validator** skill to:
Step 1: Claim Detection
Identify all factual claims in the document:
- Statistics and numbers
- Dates and timelines
- Technical specifications
- Market data
- Performance claims
- Quotes and paraphrases
Step 2: Citation Presence Check
Verify every factual claim has a citation
Step 3: Citation Completeness Check
Verify each citation includes: 1. Author/Organization 2. Publication Date 3. Source Title 4. URL/DOI 5. Page Numbers (if applicable)
Step 4: Source Quality Assessment
Rate each source using the A-E scale:
- **A**: Peer-reviewed, systematic reviews, RCTs
- **B**: Cohort studies, clinical guidelines, reputable analysts
- **C**: Expert opinion, case reports, mechanistic studies
- **D**: Preprints, preliminary research, blogs
- **E**: Anecdotal, theoretical, speculative
Step 5: Citation Accuracy Verification
Use WebSearch or WebFetch to verify sources actually support the claims
Step 6: Hallucination Detection
Identify claims with no supporting sources or incorrect citations
Step 7: Generate Validation Report
# Citation Validation Report
## Executive Summary
- **Total Claims Analyzed**: [number]
- **Claims with Citations**: [number] ([percentage]%)
- **Complete Citations**: [number] ([percentage]%)
- **Accurate Citations**: [number] ([percentage]%)
- **Potential Hallucinations**: [number]
- **Overall Quality Score**: [score]/10
## Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
[List any hallucinations or serious accuracy issues]
## Detailed Findings
[Line-by-line or claim-by-claim analysis]
## Recommendations
[Prioritized list of fixes]
Output
Save the validation report to `sources/citation_validation_report.md` in the research directory.
Begin citation validation now.
Read more
description: 验证研究文档中的引用准确性、完整性和质量 argument-hint: [文件路径] allowed-tools: Read, WebSearch, WebFetch, Write
Citation Validation
Verify all citations in a research document for accuracy, completeness, and quality.
File Path
$ARGUMENTS
Your Task
Use the **citation-validator** skill to:
Step 1: Claim Detection
Identify all factual claims in the document:
- Statistics and numbers
- Dates and timelines
- Technical specifications
- Market data
- Performance claims
- Quotes and paraphrases
Step 2: Citation Presence Check
Verify every factual claim has a citation
Step 3: Citation Completeness Check
Verify each citation includes: 1. Author/Organization 2. Publication Date 3. Source Title 4. URL/DOI 5. Page Numbers (if applicable)
Step 4: Source Quality Assessment
Rate each source using the A-E scale:
- **A**: Peer-reviewed, systematic reviews, RCTs
- **B**: Cohort studies, clinical guidelines, reputable analysts
- **C**: Expert opinion, case reports, mechanistic studies
- **D**: Preprints, preliminary research, blogs
- **E**: Anecdotal, theoretical, speculative
Step 5: Citation Accuracy Verification
Use WebSearch or WebFetch to verify sources actually support the claims
Step 6: Hallucination Detection
Identify claims with no supporting sources or incorrect citations
Step 7: Generate Validation Report
# Citation Validation Report ## Executive Summary - **Total Claims Analyzed**: [number] - **Claims with Citations**: [number] ([percentage]%) - **Complete Citations**: [number] ([percentage]%) - **Accurate Citations**: [number] ([percentage]%) - **Potential Hallucinations**: [number] - **Overall Quality Score**: [score]/10 ## Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required) [List any hallucinations or serious accuracy issues] ## Detailed Findings [Line-by-line or claim-by-claim analysis] ## Recommendations [Prioritized list of fixes]
Output
Save the validation report to `sources/citation_validation_report.md` in the research directory.
Begin citation validation now.
Investment Research Edition - 专业股票投资尽调系统 ⚖️ 免责声明 本研究报告不构成投资建议或推荐。所有投资存在风险,包括本金损失。 重要提示: 本报告仅供教育和信息用途 部分数据需要通过官方渠道验证 过往业绩不代表未来表现 投资决策前请自行进行尽职调查 建议咨询合格的财务顾问 🎓 研究框架 本研究基于 Claude Code Deep Research 系统: 方法论: 8阶段股票投资尽调框架 智能体: 28个并行研究智能体 工具: WebSearch、WebFetch、综合分析

