/pick-a-lane

name: pick-a-lane
description: Diagnoses drafts that tell three half-stories instead of one full story, and rewrites them around the single strongest narrative thread. Implements Konrad's rule 7 and Adam Bryant's "stay in your lane" advice — distinct from compression (which cuts words) because pick-a-lane cuts whole stories. Use when a bio, cold email, op-ed, or pitch reads as a resume regurgitation, when the writer is dumping multiple accomplishments instead of telling one fully, or when a paragraph keeps turning corners. Triggers on "pick a lane," "stay in your lane," "too many stories," "resume dump," "before/after rewrite," "compress the narrative," "feels like a CV."

Pick a lane

Source: Konrad's rule 7 from *Winning Writing*, Adam Bryant's *Corner Office* column (NYT) on what CEOs look for in candidates, and a before/after rewrite pattern taught in Kramon's class.

The premise

Most personal writing fails not because the writer lacks material but because the writer has too much of it and won't choose. Five accomplishments mentioned in 200 words means each one gets 40 words. None lands.

Pick a lane. Tell one story in full. Trust that the reader who wants the rest can find your LinkedIn.

> *"Pick a lane, and stay in it. Don't stray all over the highway by regurgitating your resume. Stay on that story and tell it right."* — Adam Bryant (via Glenn Kramon's class)

This is distinct from `compression`. Compression cuts adverbs and throat-clearing. Pick-a-lane cuts whole biographical episodes. They run different surgeries.

What "all over the highway" looks like

Three failure shapes. All three can fit in one paragraph.

1. The career-arc dump

*"I started in management consulting, then went to a Series B startup, then moved to private equity, then co-founded a company, then came to GSB."*

Five jobs in one sentence. The reader learns nothing about any of them. This is what your LinkedIn header is for.

2. The skill-collection dump

*"I have led teams of 5–50, built ML systems from scratch, raised capital from top-tier VCs, written code in seven languages, and managed P&Ls of $100M+."*

Five claims, zero evidence for any of them. Reads as bragging because each line is a label without proof.

3. The story-soup

*"In high school I won the state debate championship. In college I founded a tutoring nonprofit. At my first job I led a $50M product launch. At my second job I rebuilt the data platform. At Stanford I'm exploring AI agents and writing a Substack."*

Five stories, each two sentences. None of them is told. The reader doesn't know what you actually did or why it mattered.

What "stay in your lane" looks like

One story. Told fully. With a scene, a tension, a turn, and a take.

A canonical before/after used in Kramon's class teaches the rule. The *before* version is the writer trying to introduce themselves with everything at once — Harvard admission, blackjack team, private equity job, skincare startup, all crammed into four paragraphs with no scene anywhere. The *after* version takes one of those threads (the blackjack-team years) and opens cinematically: a casino floor, two women at the table, the pit bosses misreading them, the math being run silently underneath the laughter. The other facts (Harvard, the boarding-school cold-email at 16, the path after blackjack) stay in the essay — but as supporting context that comes *after* the scene, not as competing headlines.

The lesson: the *after* version isn't shorter than the *before*. It's narrower. One lane, fully told, with the other facts demoted to evidence.

Why the rewrite works

• **A scene.** Date, place, sensory detail, two specific characters.
• **A turn.** The reader's first read (suckers) gets overturned (research project).
• **A take.** A categorical claim — casinos used to assume X; not anymore — that the scene earns.
• **The other facts are still there.** They've been demoted to context, not cut.

The same person. The same facts. One lane. Twice the impact.

Build your own version

To copy the move: 1. Find your single most cinematic story (your "Vegas table") — the one with a date, a place, a specific moment, a turn. 2. Open the bio inside that scene, in past tense, with one sentence of action and one of dialogue or sensory detail. 3. After the scene lands, arc back to the longer biographical context (where you came from, what you did before, where you are now) — but as supporting evidence for the scene's take, not as a separate narrative. 4. Close with what the scene taught you that still operates today.

How to pick the lane

Three questions, in order:

1. Which story is the most cinematic?

Which one has a date, a place, a moment, a quote, an image, a turn? That's your candidate. If multiple stories have scenes, pick the one with the most surprising turn.

2. Which story is most "you"?

Which one shows a quality of mind the reader can't get from your resume? An unusual side project + a first-generation backstory has more friction than an Ivy-to-finance-to-MBA path, and friction is where character shows.

3. Which story serves the ask?

If the reader is a VC, the founding story serves. If the reader is a hiring manager for a research role, the dissertation serves. If the reader is anyone, the story that contains the most universal human stakes serves.

If you score a story 5/5 on cinematic + 5/5 on "you" + 5/5 on serves-the-ask, that's your lane. Stay in it.

How to run the pass

Pass 1 — Map the stories

Read the draft. Mark every distinct story or accomplishment with a letter:

• A: a specific project or unusual experience
• B: a founding / leadership role
• C: a notable employer
• D: a side venture
• E: an extracurricular or volunteer role

Count: how many As, Bs, Cs do you have? Most over-stuffed bios have 4–6.

Pass 2 — Score each story

For each, rate 1–5 on:

• **Cinematic** (scene, date, image, quote)
• **You** (shows a quality of mind unique to you)

-