bluf-rewriter
Reorganizes a memo, email, status update, or report so the bottom line is up front. Implements Kramon's BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) rule. Use when a draft…
Makes a draft read like a real human typed it — adds asymmetry, light contractions, and (rarely) one safe typo. Use only when a draft is technically correct but reads polished beyond plausibility, when the user wants to "rough it up," "make it more human," or "less AI-clean."
$ npx -y skills add kalyvask/winning-writing --skill humanize --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/humanizeContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Makes a draft read like a real human typed it — adds asymmetry, light contractions, and (rarely) one safe typo. Use only when a draft is technically correct but reads polished beyond plausibility, when the user wants to "rough it up," "make it more human," or "less AI-clean."
name: humanize description: Makes a draft read like a real human typed it — adds asymmetry, light contractions, and (rarely) one safe typo. Use only when a draft is technically correct but reads polished beyond plausibility, when the user wants to "rough it up," "make it more human," or "less AI-clean." Does NOT run on high-stakes writing (see "When NOT to humanize"). Triggers on "humanize," "rough it up," "less polished," "more casual," "sounds too clean."
Source: `points/ai-writing-rules.md` and the centaur-writer thesis. The point of this skill is the inverse of every other skill in this repo — most of them sharpen, this one *de-sharpens* deliberately.
**Operator note (2026-05-07):** Dialed back from the original aggressive setting (too many typos and missing words landed in finals), then re-tuned for a middle ground: a few safe roughening moves are still welcome even in short pieces. The bias is "fewer types of typos, but still some texture" — not "skip everything."
A perfect email is suspicious. Real people:
A model output is *too clean*. This skill leaves a small amount of real-person residue in. Note: residue, not damage. Missing required words and unsafe typos are damage; do not introduce them.
Take the draft and: 1. Cut 10–20% of the words 2. Convert most "I am / it is / they are / cannot" to contractions, but mix in one full form somewhere for inconsistency 3. Drop the *subject pronoun* in one casual opener if the draft has one (never drop articles) 4. Vary one sentence's punctuation in a slightly imperfect way (a period instead of a comma; a sentence fragment) 5. Optionally combine two short adjacent paragraphs into one (or keep an aside on the same line instead of breaking) — humans don't always hit return where AI does 6. Apply at most ONE safe typo (see below). Pieces under ~150 words: max 1 typo. Pieces over 300 words: still max 2 typos total. Never accumulate.
Same as above, no length cut.
These are not typos — they are rhythm choices that read as a real person rather than a model. Apply 1–2 per piece without worry:
Only these types qualify as safe typos. Pick ONE for short pieces, at most TWO across longer pieces.
That's it. The three above are the only approved typo types.
**NEVER use:**
The wrong typo is worse than no typo. **When uncertain, skip the typo (but still apply the safe rhythm moves above).**
Drop the subject pronoun in a casual opener, never the article:
Do not drop "the," "a," "an," "to," or any other article or function word. Do not drop the subject inside a clause that already has one.
The skill does not run on:
31 Claude skills for cold outreach, op-eds, pitches, press inquiries, bios, exec memos, performance reviews, spoken-delivery talks, fact-checking, and reply-rate tracking.
Repo: kalyvask/winning-writing
Reorganizes a memo, email, status update, or report so the bottom line is up front. Implements Kramon's BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) rule. Use when a draft…
Cuts a draft to a target word count without losing substance. Two modes behind one skill. target-count hits a specific number (200 for a cold email, 500 for an…
Rewrites blunt downward or peer feedback as "what I like plus what I would like," focused on the work rather than the person, ideally phrased as a question.…
Finds the unexpected, dry, or self-deprecating angle that makes an email memorable. Turns "professional and polite" into "this person sounds like a real…
Rewrites section titles, slide titles, op-ed headlines, email subject lines, and chapter headings from category labels into bold arguable claims. Implements…
Cuts cinematic details that don't serve the main point. The opposite move from vividness. Vividness adds sensory detail; this skill removes detail that's vivid…