COMMAND
Surface and validate Claude's hidden assumptions about the project for user confirmation
Create a discovery document for research/customer discovery epics
> /plugin marketplace add Jeffallan/claude-skills > /plugin install fullstack-dev-skills@fullstack-dev-skills
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/create-epic-discoveryContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Create a discovery document for research/customer discovery epics
name: create-epic-discovery description: Create a discovery document for research/customer discovery epics argument-hint: <epic-key>
**Epic Key:** $ARGUMENTS
---
This command creates a discovery document for research and customer discovery epics:
/create-epic-discovery <epic-key> → Creates Discovery Document (YOU ARE HERE)
↓
[Manual research, interviews, experiments]
↓
/synthesize-discovery <doc-urls...> → Synthesizes findings into actionable tickets
↓
Creates tickets in target implementation epics---
1. **Fetch the epic** from Jira using `{Epic_Key}`
2. **Extract from epic:**
3. **Determine Confluence location:**
4. **FAILURE CONDITION - Missing Information:**
If epic cannot be found or has no linked tickets:
**STOP and prompt the user:**
I was unable to retrieve epic {Epic_Key}.
Issue: [epic not found / no linked tickets / access denied]
Please provide:
1. Confirm the epic key is correct
2. Jira Project URL: [paste link]
3. Confluence publish location: [paste link or confirm default]**DO NOT PROCEED** until confirmed.
5. **MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Epic Confirmation:**
Please confirm before I proceed:
Epic Key: {Epic_Key}
Epic Title: {Epic_Title}
Linked Tickets: [count] tickets found
Publish Location: [Confluence path]
Is this correct? (Yes / No / Correct)**DO NOT PROCEED** without explicit user confirmation.
---
1. **Read all Jira tickets** linked to epic `{Epic_Key}`
2. **Categorize questions** into themes:
3. **Identify research methods** needed for each question:
---
Create a discovery document with these sections:
For each major feature/capability in the epic:
| Hypothesis ID | Statement | Confidence | Validation Method | Status | |---------------|-----------|------------|-------------------|--------| | H1 | "Users need X because Y" | Low/Med/High | Interview/Data/Spike | Open | | H2 | "We can integrate with Z" | Low/Med/High | Technical spike | Open |
Organize questions by category and priority:
| ID | Question | Priority | Method | Owner | Status | |----|----------|----------|--------|-------|--------| | Q1 | Who are the primary users? | High | Interviews | [TBD] | Open | | Q2 | What pain points exist today? | High | Interviews + Data | [TBD] | Open |
| ID | Question | Priority | Method | Owner | Status | |----|----------|----------|--------|-------|--------| | T1 | Can we integrate with X API? | High | Spike | [TBD] | Open | | T2 | What are the performance implications? | Med | Benchmark | [TBD] | Open |
| ID | Question | Priority | Method | Owner | Status | |----|----------|----------|--------|-------|--------| | B1 | What's the expected ROI? | High | Analysis | [TBD] | Open | | B2 | How does this compare to competitors? | Med | Research | [TBD] | Open |
| ID | Question | Priority | Method | Owner | Status | |----|----------|----------|--------|-------|--------| | S1 | What's the MVP vs full vision? | High | Discussion | [TBD] | Open | | S2 | What's explicitly out of scope? | High | Discussion | [TBD] | Open |
For each high-priority question, outline:
**Activity:** [Interview/Spike/Analysis/etc.] **Questions Addressed:** Q1, Q2, T1 **Method:** [Detailed approach] **Participants/Resources:** [Who/what is needed] **Expected Duration:** [Time estimate] **Output:** [Deliverable format]
Define how findings will be evaluated:
| Decision Point | Options | Criteria | Owner | |----------------|---------|----------|-------| | Build vs Buy for X | Build, Buy, Partner | Cost, Time, Control | [TBD] | | Target user segment | Segment A, B, Both | Market size, Fit | [TBD] |
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Owner | |------|------------|--------|------------|-------| | Users don't want this feature | Med | High | Early validation interviews | [TBD] | | Technical integration too complex | Low | High | Spike before commitment | [TBD] |
L
67 Specialized Skills for Full-Stack Developers. Transform Claude Code into your expert pair programmer.
Repo: Jeffallan/claude-skills
Surface and validate Claude's hidden assumptions about the project for user confirmation
Reference for: Common Ground Load when: Classifying assumptions, determining type or tier
Reference for: Common Ground Load when: Storage operations, project identification, file format
Reference for: Common Ground Load when: Using --graph flag, generating mermaid diagrams
Approve synthesis findings and create implementation tickets from discovery
Synthesize discovery findings into a consolidated analysis document with proposed tickets