agile
Deliver a large or multi-stage effort through Hydraia Agile Mode — decompose into an epic, user stories, tasks, subtasks + QA, optionally sync to Jira, then…
Explain a codebase, subsystem, or PR to a human — visually and verifiably. Grounds a diagram in codegraph's real structure and delivers a self-contained interactive HTML map with guided walkthrough chapters.
> /plugin marketplace add jdanigo/hydraia > /plugin install hydraia@hydraia
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/explainmeContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Explain a codebase, subsystem, or PR to a human — visually and verifiably. Grounds a diagram in codegraph's real structure and delivers a self-contained interactive HTML map with guided walkthrough chapters.
description: Explain a codebase, subsystem, or PR to a human — visually and verifiably. Grounds a diagram in codegraph's real structure and delivers a self-contained interactive HTML map with guided walkthrough chapters. argument-hint: <what to explain — a subsystem, path, PR, or "how does X work">
Invoke the **explainme** skill to produce a visual, verifiable explanation of the code in question. Follow the skill's Hydraia grounding first:
1. Resolve the scope from `$ARGUMENTS` (a subsystem, a path, a PR diff, or a "how does X work" question). Default to the current repo's headline subsystem if unscoped. 2. **Query codegraph** for the real structure — components/modules, call edges, entry points, storage/transports, blast radius. This is the topology source; do not guess it. 3. Pick the diagram type that fits (architecture / workflow / sequence / dataflow / lifecycle) — `node skills/explainme/bin/archify.mjs guide "<scenario>" --json` if unsure. 4. Author the typed IR from the verified codegraph nodes/edges; set `SRC` source-evidence from real file:line so nodes are click-through. Attach up to ~5 guided-walkthrough `views` chapters framing the onboarding path (request path / auth flow / data lineage / lifecycle). 5. Validate then deliver, running the CLI from the skill directory: `cd skills/explainme && node bin/archify.mjs validate <type> <in.json> --quality showcase --json` then `node bin/archify.mjs deliver <type> <in.json> <out.html> --json`. Consume the `diagnostics[]` repair receipts in a bounded loop (change only the diagnosed subject, at most one geometry control per repair, stop after two non-improving rounds). 6. Write the artifact under the resolved artifacts base (`<base>/explain/<slug>.html`) and hand the user the path. Do NOT run the full build pipeline — this is an explanation artifact, not a code change; no spec/plan/review gates apply.
Delegate the authoring to the `explainme` agent (Sonnet) when available; the deterministic CLI carries the correctness. Requires Node ≥ 18 (see `/hydraia:doctor`).
Request: $ARGUMENTS
An agentic development harness for Claude Code. **One command runs the entire feature pipeline** — it collaborates with you on the design, then builds autonomously: plan, execute, double-review, and verify.
Repo: jdanigo/hydraia
Deliver a large or multi-stage effort through Hydraia Agile Mode — decompose into an epic, user stories, tasks, subtasks + QA, optionally sync to Jira, then…
Design a new app or service from scratch — guided elicitation, architecture proposals, stack choice, API contract, ADRs — then build it through the full…
Launch the local Hydraia dashboard (status, usage telemetry, editable config) in the browser
Diagnose and fix a database bottleneck evidence-first — EXPLAIN, indexes, N+1, locks, pooling, safe migrations
Author CI/CD, containers, or IaC following the repo's platform — deploy and secrets flagged for human approval, never executed
Sync README, API docs, CHANGELOG, and the ADR index with the actual code — reports drift, never invents behavior