/research-phase
Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use /gsd:plan-phase instead)
$ npx -y skills add itsjwill/gsd-pro --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/research-phase
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use /gsd:plan-phase instead)
Command definition
research-phase.mdname: gsd:research-phase
description: Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use /gsd:plan-phase instead)
argument-hint: "[phase]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Bash
- Task
<objective> Research how to implement a phase. Spawns gsd-phase-researcher agent with phase context.
**Note:** This is a standalone research command. For most workflows, use `/gsd:plan-phase` which integrates research automatically.
**Use this command when:**
- You want to research without planning yet
- You want to re-research after planning is complete
- You need to investigate before deciding if a phase is feasible
**Orchestrator role:** Parse phase, validate against roadmap, check existing research, gather context, spawn researcher agent, present results.
**Why subagent:** Research burns context fast (WebSearch, Context7 queries, source verification). Fresh 200k context for investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction. </objective>
<context> Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
Normalize phase input in step 1 before any directory lookups. </context>
<process>
0. Initialize Context
INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" init phase-op "$ARGUMENTS")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fiExtract from init JSON: `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `phase_found`, `commit_docs`, `has_research`, `state_path`, `requirements_path`, `context_path`, `research_path`.
Resolve researcher model:
RESEARCHER_MODEL=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" resolve-model gsd-phase-researcher --raw)
1. Validate Phase
PHASE_INFO=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" roadmap get-phase "${phase_number}")**If `found` is false:** Error and exit. **If `found` is true:** Extract `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `goal` from JSON.
2. Check Existing Research
ls .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null**If exists:** Offer: 1) Update research, 2) View existing, 3) Skip. Wait for response.
**If doesn't exist:** Continue.
3. Gather Phase Context
Use paths from INIT (do not inline file contents in orchestrator context):
- `requirements_path`
- `context_path`
- `state_path`
Present summary with phase description and what files the researcher will load.
4. Spawn gsd-phase-researcher Agent
Research modes: ecosystem (default), feasibility, implementation, comparison.
<research_type>
Phase Research — investigating HOW to implement a specific phase well.
</research_type>
<key_insight>
The question is NOT "which library should I use?"
The question is: "What do I not know that I don't know?"
For this phase, discover:
- What's the established architecture pattern?
- What libraries form the standard stack?
- What problems do people commonly hit?
- What's SOTA vs what Claude's training thinks is SOTA?
- What should NOT be hand-rolled?
</key_insight>
<objective>
Research implementation approach for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
Mode: ecosystem
</objective>
<files_to_read>
- {requirements_path} (Requirements)
- {context_path} (Phase context from discuss-phase, if exists)
- {state_path} (Prior project decisions and blockers)
</files_to_read>
<additional_context>
**Phase description:** {phase_description}
</additional_context>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md will be loaded by `/gsd:plan-phase` which uses specific sections:
- `## Standard Stack` → Plans use these libraries
- `## Architecture Patterns` → Task structure follows these
- `## Don't Hand-Roll` → Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems
- `## Common Pitfalls` → Verification steps check for these
- `## Code Examples` → Task actions reference these patterns
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
</downstream_consumer>
<quality_gate>
Before declaring complete, verify:
- [ ] All domains investigated (not just some)
- [ ] Negative claims verified with official docs
- [ ] Multiple sources for critical claims
- [ ] Confidence levels assigned honestly
- [ ] Section names match what plan-phase expects
</quality_gate>
<output>
Write to: .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md
</output>Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Research Phase {phase}"
)5. Handle Agent Return
**`## RESEARCH COMPLETE`:** Display summary, offer: Plan phase, Dig deeper, Review full, Done.
**`## CHECKPOINT REACHED`:** Present to user, get response, spawn continuation.
**`## RESEARCH INCONCLUSIVE`:** Show what was attempted, offer: Add context, Try different mode, Manual.
6. Spawn Continuation Agent
<objective>
Continue research for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
</objective>
<prior_state>
<files_to_read>
- .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md (Existing research)
</files_to_read>
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Continue research Phase {phase}"
)</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Phase validated against roadmap
- [ ] Existing research checked
- [ ] gsd-phase-researcher spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] User knows next steps
</success_criteria>
Read more
name: gsd:research-phase description: Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use /gsd:plan-phase instead) argument-hint: "[phase]" allowed-tools: - Read - Bash - Task
<objective> Research how to implement a phase. Spawns gsd-phase-researcher agent with phase context.
**Note:** This is a standalone research command. For most workflows, use `/gsd:plan-phase` which integrates research automatically.
**Use this command when:**
- You want to research without planning yet
- You want to re-research after planning is complete
- You need to investigate before deciding if a phase is feasible
**Orchestrator role:** Parse phase, validate against roadmap, check existing research, gather context, spawn researcher agent, present results.
**Why subagent:** Research burns context fast (WebSearch, Context7 queries, source verification). Fresh 200k context for investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction. </objective>
<context> Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
Normalize phase input in step 1 before any directory lookups. </context>
<process>
0. Initialize Context
INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" init phase-op "$ARGUMENTS")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fiExtract from init JSON: `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `phase_found`, `commit_docs`, `has_research`, `state_path`, `requirements_path`, `context_path`, `research_path`.
Resolve researcher model:
RESEARCHER_MODEL=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" resolve-model gsd-phase-researcher --raw)
1. Validate Phase
PHASE_INFO=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" roadmap get-phase "${phase_number}")**If `found` is false:** Error and exit. **If `found` is true:** Extract `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `goal` from JSON.
2. Check Existing Research
ls .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null**If exists:** Offer: 1) Update research, 2) View existing, 3) Skip. Wait for response.
**If doesn't exist:** Continue.
3. Gather Phase Context
Use paths from INIT (do not inline file contents in orchestrator context):
- `requirements_path`
- `context_path`
- `state_path`
Present summary with phase description and what files the researcher will load.
4. Spawn gsd-phase-researcher Agent
Research modes: ecosystem (default), feasibility, implementation, comparison.
<research_type>
Phase Research — investigating HOW to implement a specific phase well.
</research_type>
<key_insight>
The question is NOT "which library should I use?"
The question is: "What do I not know that I don't know?"
For this phase, discover:
- What's the established architecture pattern?
- What libraries form the standard stack?
- What problems do people commonly hit?
- What's SOTA vs what Claude's training thinks is SOTA?
- What should NOT be hand-rolled?
</key_insight>
<objective>
Research implementation approach for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
Mode: ecosystem
</objective>
<files_to_read>
- {requirements_path} (Requirements)
- {context_path} (Phase context from discuss-phase, if exists)
- {state_path} (Prior project decisions and blockers)
</files_to_read>
<additional_context>
**Phase description:** {phase_description}
</additional_context>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md will be loaded by `/gsd:plan-phase` which uses specific sections:
- `## Standard Stack` → Plans use these libraries
- `## Architecture Patterns` → Task structure follows these
- `## Don't Hand-Roll` → Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems
- `## Common Pitfalls` → Verification steps check for these
- `## Code Examples` → Task actions reference these patterns
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
</downstream_consumer>
<quality_gate>
Before declaring complete, verify:
- [ ] All domains investigated (not just some)
- [ ] Negative claims verified with official docs
- [ ] Multiple sources for critical claims
- [ ] Confidence levels assigned honestly
- [ ] Section names match what plan-phase expects
</quality_gate>
<output>
Write to: .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md
</output>Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Research Phase {phase}"
)5. Handle Agent Return
**`## RESEARCH COMPLETE`:** Display summary, offer: Plan phase, Dig deeper, Review full, Done.
**`## CHECKPOINT REACHED`:** Present to user, get response, spawn continuation.
**`## RESEARCH INCONCLUSIVE`:** Show what was attempted, offer: Add context, Try different mode, Manual.
6. Spawn Continuation Agent
<objective>
Continue research for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
</objective>
<prior_state>
<files_to_read>
- .planning/phases/${PHASE}-{slug}/${PHASE}-RESEARCH.md (Existing research)
</files_to_read>
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
model="{researcher_model}",
description="Continue research Phase {phase}"
)</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Phase validated against roadmap
- [ ] Existing research checked
- [ ] gsd-phase-researcher spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] User knows next steps
</success_criteria>
GSD Pro — The most powerful AI coding workflow for Claude Code. Free alternative to Cursor Composer, Copilot Workspace, Devin & Bolt. Multi-model routing, rollback/recovery, adaptive context. Fork of 30K★ original. npx get-shit-done-cc
Repo: itsjwill/gsd-pro
Other commands on gsd-pro.
- /add-phase
Add phase to end of current milestone in roadmap
Open command - /add-tests
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Open command - /add-todo
Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context
Open command - /audit-milestone
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving
Open command - /autonomous
Run all remaining phases autonomously — discuss→plan→execute per phase
Open command - /check-todos
List pending todos and select one to work on
Open command

