auto-research
Deep strategic research engine — decomposes questions into parallel research threads, spawns…
Personalize COG for your workflow - creates profile, interests, and watchlist files with guided setup (run this first!)
$ npx -y skills add huytieu/COG-second-brain --skill onboarding --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/onboardingContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Personalize COG for your workflow - creates profile, interests, and watchlist files with guided setup (run this first!)
name: onboarding description: Personalize COG for your workflow - creates profile, interests, and watchlist files with guided setup (run this first!) roles: [all] integrations: []
Welcome new users and collect essential information to personalize their COG experience. All configuration is stored as natural markdown files within the vault structure, following COG's philosophy of transparent, editable knowledge.
**The onboarding MUST feel like a natural conversation, NOT a form to fill out.**
Key rules:
Greet the user warmly and explain what COG is:
Welcome to COG - your self-evolving second brain powered by Claude + Obsidian + Git! COG helps you capture thoughts, get daily intelligence briefings, and build knowledge over time - all stored as simple markdown files you own. Let's get you set up. Tell me a bit about yourself - your name, what you do, and what topics or areas you're most interested in staying sharp on. Feel free to share as much or as little as you'd like.
**This single open-ended prompt replaces the old sequential questions.** The user can naturally mention their name, role, interests, sources, projects, and competitors all at once - or just share a few things.
Look for `00-inbox/MY-PROFILE.md`. If it exists:
I found an existing COG profile! What would you like to update? Just tell me what you'd like to change - your interests, projects, profile info, or anything else.
**Don't present a numbered menu.** Let them describe what they want in natural language.
After the user responds, extract as much as possible from their natural language:
| Field | How to Extract | |-------|---------------| | **Name** | Look for self-introduction patterns ("I'm Alex", "My name is...", "Call me..."). Use first name by default. | | **Role** | Look for job/activity mentions ("I'm a PM", "I work in...", "software engineer at..."). | | **Interests** | Look for topic mentions ("interested in AI", "following crypto", "love design"). Also infer from role context. | | **News Sources** | Look for source mentions ("I read HN", "follow on Twitter"). If not mentioned, skip - it's optional. | | **Projects** | Look for project mentions ("working on a SaaS app", "building..."). If not mentioned, skip. | | **Competitive Watch** | Look for company/person mentions ("tracking Stripe", "watching what OpenAI does"). If not mentioned, skip. |
After extracting what you can, check what's missing from the **required** fields only:
If any required field is missing, ask ONE follow-up that covers all gaps. For example:
Thanks! I got your name and role. What topics are you most interested in staying updated on? (e.g., AI, startups, design, health - whatever matters to you)
**Optional fields** (news sources, projects, competitive watch) should NEVER generate follow-up questions. If the user didn't mention them, skip them. They can always add them later by editing the files or running onboarding again.
Before creating files, briefly confirm what you captured and ask about agent team mode:
Here's what I've got: - **Name**: Alex - **Role**: Product Manager at a fintech startup - **Interests**: AI/ML, fintech trends, product strategy, UX design - **Projects**: Payments dashboard revamp - **Tracking**: Stripe, Plaid One more thing - COG can run in two modes: - **Solo mode** (default): I handle everything directly in our conversation. - **Agent team mode**: I delegate research, analysis, and writing to specialist sub-agents for deeper, more thorough results. Works best with Claude Code. Which do you prefer? (Solo is great for most people - team mode is for power users who want maximum depth.)
**Wait for confirmation**, then generate everything. If they say "looks good" or similar, proceed. If they correct something, update and proceed without re-confirming. Default to `solo` if they don't express a preference.
After extracting the user's role text in Step 3, scan `.claude/roles/*.md` for a matching role pack:
1. Read each role pack file's YAML frontmatter (`role_id` and `aliases`) 2. Compare the user's extracted role text (case-insensitive) against:
3. If a match is found:
As a [Role Display Name], here are the skills and integrations that'll be most use
Cognition + Obsidian + Git — A self-evolving second brain powered by AI agents, markdown files, and version control. No database, no vendor lock-in — just .md files that think.
Deep strategic research engine — decomposes questions into parallel research threads, spawns…
Quick capture of raw thoughts with intelligent domain classification and competitive…
Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component…
Deep-dive 7-day analysis across all data sources for weekly reviews, board prep, and…
Autonomous content pipeline - scout announcements in your field, triage by trend momentum and…
Create user stories with duplicate checking across any project tracker (Linear, GitHub…