deepagents-architectur…
Guides architectural decisions for Deep Agents applications. Use when deciding between Deep Agents vs alternatives, choosing backend strategies, designing…
Reviews WidgetKit code for timeline management, view composition, configurable intents, and performance. Use when reviewing code with import WidgetKit, TimelineProvider, Widget protocol, or @main struct Widget.
$ npx -y skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill widgetkit-code-review --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/widgetkit-code-reviewContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Reviews WidgetKit code for timeline management, view composition, configurable intents, and performance. Use when reviewing code with import WidgetKit, TimelineProvider, Widget protocol, or @main struct Widget.
name: widgetkit-code-review description: Reviews WidgetKit code for timeline management, view composition, configurable intents, and performance. Use when reviewing code with import WidgetKit, TimelineProvider, Widget protocol, or @main struct Widget.
| Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | TimelineProvider, entries, reload policies | [references/timeline.md](references/timeline.md) | | Widget families, containerBackground, deep linking | [references/views.md](references/views.md) | | AppIntentConfiguration, EntityQuery, @Parameter | [references/intents.md](references/intents.md) | | Refresh budget, memory limits, caching | [references/performance.md](references/performance.md) |
1. Does the widget provide fallback entries for when system delays refresh? 2. Are Lock Screen families (accessoryCircular/Rectangular/Inline) handled appropriately? 3. Would migrating from IntentConfiguration break existing user widgets? 4. Is timeline populated with future entries or does it rely on frequent refreshes? 5. Is data cached via App Groups for widget access?
Complete **in order** for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.
1. **Location artifact** — The finding includes `[FILE:LINE]` (or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo. 2. **Scope read** — You read the full surrounding implementation: the `TimelineProvider` (including `placeholder`, `getSnapshot`, and `getTimeline` when relevant), the `@main` `Widget` / widget bundle, or the configurable widget’s `AppIntentConfiguration` / intent types—not only a diff hunk or snippet. 3. **Platform or system claim** (only if the finding depends on refresh budget, ~30MB memory guidance, Lock Screen accessory families, iOS 17+ `containerBackground`, App Groups data sharing, or migration from `IntentConfiguration` to `AppIntentConfiguration`) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example `.entitlements` / App Group id in project, `WidgetFamily` handling in source, `IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, or the exact reference subsection you used) **or** you drop or downgrade the finding to an open question. 4. **Protocol** — Pre-report steps in [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).
Use the issue format `[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE` for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.
Image: NASA, Public Domain. Source Beagle is an Agent Skills marketplace: framework-aware code review, documentation, testing, architectural analysis, and git workflows for any compatible coding agent.
Repo: existential-birds/beagle
Guides architectural decisions for Deep Agents applications. Use when deciding between Deep Agents vs alternatives, choosing backend strategies, designing…
Reviews Deep Agents code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses create_deep_agent, backends, subagents, middleware, or…
Implements agents using Deep Agents. Use when building agents with create_deep_agent, configuring backends, defining subagents, adding middleware, or setting…
Guides architectural decisions for LangGraph applications. Use when deciding between LangGraph vs alternatives, choosing state management strategies, designing…
Reviews LangGraph code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses StateGraph, nodes, edges, checkpointing, or other LangGraph…
Implements stateful agent graphs using LangGraph. Use when building graphs, adding nodes/edges, defining state schemas, implementing checkpointing, handling…