Skip to content
Development
Skill

/tokio-async-code-review

Reviews tokio async runtime usage for task management, sync primitives, channel patterns, and runtime configuration. Covers Rust 2024 edition changes including async fn in traits, RPIT lifetime capture, LazyLock, and if-let temporary scoping. Use when reviewing Rust code that

From plugin
beagle
82139 skills2 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill tokio-async-code-review --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/tokio-async-code-review

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Reviews tokio async runtime usage for task management, sync primitives, channel patterns, and runtime configuration. Covers Rust 2024 edition changes including async fn in traits, RPIT lifetime capture, LazyLock, and if-let temporary scoping. Use when reviewing Rust code that

SKILL.md

tokio-async-code-review.SKILL.md
name: tokio-async-code-review
description: Reviews tokio async runtime usage for task management, sync primitives, channel patterns, and runtime configuration. Covers Rust 2024 edition changes including async fn in traits, RPIT lifetime capture, LazyLock, and if-let temporary scoping. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses tokio, async/await patterns, spawn, channels, or async synchronization. Also covers tokio-util, tower, and hyper integration patterns.

Tokio Async Code Review

Review Workflow

1. **Check Cargo.toml** — Note tokio feature flags (`full`, `rt-multi-thread`, `macros`, `sync`, etc.). Missing features cause confusing compile errors. 2. **Check runtime setup** — Is `#[tokio::main]` or manual runtime construction used? Multi-thread vs current-thread? 3. **Scan for blocking** — Search for `std::fs`, `std::net`, `std::thread::sleep`, CPU-heavy loops in async functions. 4. **Check channel usage** — Match channel type to communication pattern (mpsc, broadcast, oneshot, watch). 5. **Check sync primitives** — Verify correct mutex type, proper guard lifetimes, no deadlock potential.

Gates (objective passes before conclusions)

Complete in order for the review scope. Do not assert **Critical** or **Major** until the relevant gate passes.

1. **Dependency surface** — Read the crate (and workspace, if inherited) `Cargo.toml` that supplies `tokio`. **Pass:** Written note of `tokio` version and enabled features, or explicit statement that there is no direct `tokio` dependency and where it comes from (workspace/path). 2. **Runtime model** — Locate runtime construction (`#[tokio::main]`, `Runtime::builder`, tests, or library with no owned runtime). **Pass:** One line naming flavor (`multi_thread` / `current_thread` / tests-only / none) and where it is defined. 3. **Blocking inventory** — Search reviewed paths for blocking APIs (`std::fs::`, `std::net::` without async wrappers, `std::thread::sleep`, heavy CPU loops in `async fn`). **Pass:** Each hit listed as `path:line` (or tool output excerpt), or explicit “no blocking patterns found in reviewed async code” after the search. 4. **Protocol** — Load the [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) skill. **Pass:** Its pass conditions met before any finding is reported (file:line evidence for asserted issues).

Output Format

Report findings as:

[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | Task spawning, JoinHandle, structured concurrency | [references/task-management.md](references/task-management.md) | | Mutex, RwLock, Semaphore, Notify, Barrier | [references/sync-primitives.md](references/sync-primitives.md) | | mpsc, broadcast, oneshot, watch channel patterns | [references/channels.md](references/channels.md) | | Pin, cancellation, Future internals, select!, blocking bridge | [references/pinning-cancellation.md](references/pinning-cancellation.md) |

Review Checklist

Runtime Configuration

  • [ ] Tokio features in Cargo.toml match actual usage
  • [ ] Runtime flavor matches workload (`multi_thread` for I/O-bound, `current_thread` for simpler cases)
  • [ ] `#[tokio::test]` used for async tests (not manual runtime construction)
  • [ ] Worker thread count configured appropriately for production

Task Management

  • [ ] `spawn` return values (`JoinHandle`) are tracked, not silently dropped
  • [ ] `spawn_blocking` used for CPU-heavy or synchronous I/O operations
  • [ ] Tasks respect cancellation (via `CancellationToken`, `select!`, or shutdown channels)
  • [ ] `JoinError` (task panic or cancellation) is handled, not just unwrapped
  • [ ] `tokio::select!` branches are cancellation-safe
  • [ ] Native `async fn` in traits used instead of `async-trait` crate where possible (stable since Rust 1.75)
  • [ ] RPIT lifetime capture reviewed in async contexts — `-> impl Future` now captures all in-scope lifetimes in edition 2024

Sync Primitives

  • [ ] `tokio::sync::Mutex` used when lock is held across `.await`; `std::sync::Mutex` for short non-async sections
  • [ ] No mutex guard held across await points (deadlock risk)
  • [ ] `Semaphore` used for limiting concurrent operations (not ad-hoc counters)
  • [ ] `RwLock` used when read-heavy workload (many readers, infrequent writes)
  • [ ] `Notify` used for simple signaling (not channel overhead)
  • [ ] `std::sync::LazyLock` used instead of `once_cell::sync::Lazy` or `lazy_static!` for runtime-initialized singletons (stable since Rust 1.80)
  • [ ] `if let` lock guard patterns reviewed for edition 2024 temporary scoping — temporaries drop earlier, may change borrow validity

Channels

  • [ ] Channel type matches pattern: mpsc for back-pressure, broadcast for fan-out, oneshot for request-response, watch for latest-value
  • [ ] Bounded channels have appropriate capacity (not too small = deadlock, not too large = memory)
  • [ ] `SendError` / `RecvError` handled (indicates other side dropped)
  • [ ] Broadcast `Lagged` errors handled (receiver fell behind)
  • [ ] Channel senders dropped when done to signal completion to receivers

Timer and Sleep

  • [ ] `tokio::time::sleep` used instead of `std::thread::sleep`
  • [ ] `tokio::time::timeout` wraps operations that could hang
  • [ ] `tokio::time::interval` used correctly (`.tick().await` for periodic work)

Severity Calibration

Critical

  • Blocking I/O (`std::fs::read`, `std::net::TcpStream`) in async context without `spawn_blocking`
  • Mutex guard held across `.await` point (deadlock potential)
  • `std::thread::sleep` in async function (blocks runtime thread)
  • Unbounded channel where back-pressure is needed (OOM risk)

Major

  • `JoinHandle` silently dropped (lost errors, zombie tasks)
  • Missing `select!` cancellation safety consideration
  • Wrong mutex type (std vs tokio) for the use case
  • Missing timeout on network/external operations

Minor

  • `tok
Read more
Ships withbeagle

Image: NASA, Public Domain. Source Beagle is an Agent Skills marketplace: framework-aware code review, documentation, testing, architectural analysis, and git workflows for any compatible coding agent.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on beagle.