diagnose
Turn a bug symptom into a fix with a regression test that locks it down. If the user opens vague ("there's a bug", "/diagnose"), interview them one question at…
Add a refined `## Approach` section to an existing feature spec.md before TDD executes it. Reads the spec, explores the codebase to ground the approach in real modules and patterns, proposes 2–3 alternatives when they exist, validates with the user, then appends `## Approach` to
$ npx -y skills add eduwxyz/my-awesome-skills --skill spec-approach --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/spec-approachContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Add a refined `## Approach` section to an existing feature spec.md before TDD executes it. Reads the spec, explores the codebase to ground the approach in real modules and patterns, proposes 2–3 alternatives when they exist, validates with the user, then appends `## Approach` to
name: spec-approach
description: Add a refined `## Approach` section to an existing feature spec.md before TDD executes it. Reads the spec, explores the codebase to ground the approach in real modules and patterns, proposes 2–3 alternatives when they exist, validates with the user, then appends `## Approach` to the same spec file. Trigger after `interview-to-spec` for non-trivial features when the user says "plan the approach", "spec the implementation", "design the approach", "how are we building this", or before invoking `tdd` on a feature whose HOW is unclear.
hooks:
PreToolUse:
- matcher: "Write"
hooks:
- type: command
command: "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/spec-approach/hooks/spec-integrity.sh"Take an existing feature spec and add the `## Approach` — the HOW that `tdd` needs to execute. Same file, append only.
If invoked in a skip case, recognise it and tell the user "this looks trivial / already approached — go straight to `tdd`". Do not write anything.
**Identify the spec.** A path or slug for an existing `spec/<slug>.md` must be given. If neither was provided, ask the user which spec — do not guess. Never operate without an explicit target.
**Validate it.** Read the file. It must contain `Goal`, `Behaviors`, and `Acceptance criteria`. If any are missing, abort and tell the user to run `interview-to-spec` first. Never try to fill in WHAT.
1. **Read the spec.** Internalise Goal, Behaviors, AC, OOS, Edge cases. 2. **Explore the codebase.** Find relevant modules, patterns, existing ADRs, similar features. The approach must be grounded in what is actually there — not invented. 3. **Propose.** State a recommended approach. If multiple paths are viable, show 2–3 with tradeoffs and recommend one. 4. **Validate with the user.** Ask one question at a time, only when judgment is required (which alternative? what's the priority?). Do not ask what the codebase can answer — read the codebase. 5. **Append.** Add `## Approach` to the same spec file.
## Approach - **Strategy.** One paragraph describing how the work will be done end-to-end. - **Modules / files.** Concrete paths to create or modify. - **Key decisions.** The alternative considered and why this one. One bullet per decision. - **Schema / API changes.** If any. Otherwise omit this bullet. - **Risks.** Anything that might surprise us during execution. If none, omit this bullet.
Keep each bullet tight. The reader is `tdd` — it needs enough to execute, not a design doc.
Do **not** overwrite silently. Read the existing approach, then ask the user: "There's already an approach here. Want me to revise it, or is it still good?" Only edit if they confirm. When revising, replace the existing `## Approach` block via `Edit` — do not append a second one.
The spec is now self-sufficient. `tdd` consumes it directly — Behaviors + Acceptance criteria become the test queue; Approach guides the implementation.
A spec-driven development pipeline for Claude Code and Codex CLI. Refine the spec before you code, let TDD enforce it, verify nothing slipped, then review.
Turn a bug symptom into a fix with a regression test that locks it down. If the user opens vague ("there's a bug", "/diagnose"), interview them one question at…
Kick off the full feature workflow — interview-to-spec, optional spec-approach, tdd, verify, then review — when starting a new feature from scratch. Thin…
Conduct a focused interview to draft a spec.md for an upcoming task (the input step of SDD — spec-driven development). Walks through goal, behaviors,…
Drives feature work and bug fixes through a tight failing-test-first loop. Trigger when implementing, fixing, or refactoring behavior in a codebase that…