diagnose
Turn a bug symptom into a fix with a regression test that locks it down. If the user opens vague ("there's a bug", "/diagnose"), interview them one question at…
Conduct a focused interview to draft a spec.md for an upcoming task (the input step of SDD — spec-driven development). Walks through goal, behaviors, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and out-of-scope one branch at a time, then writes the spec to disk. If during the interview the
$ npx -y skills add eduwxyz/my-awesome-skills --skill interview-to-spec --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/interview-to-specContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Conduct a focused interview to draft a spec.md for an upcoming task (the input step of SDD — spec-driven development). Walks through goal, behaviors, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and out-of-scope one branch at a time, then writes the spec to disk. If during the interview the
name: interview-to-spec description: Conduct a focused interview to draft a spec.md for an upcoming task (the input step of SDD — spec-driven development). Walks through goal, behaviors, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and out-of-scope one branch at a time, then writes the spec to disk. If during the interview the scope turns out to be multiple independent features, pauses and asks the user to pick one — the chosen one becomes the spec, the rest stay outside the repo. Trigger when the user wants to draft a spec before implementation, mentions "draft the spec", "let's spec this out", "what should we build", or starts an SDD workflow.
Interview the user to draft a spec for the task at hand. Cover goal, behaviors, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and out-of-scope — one branch at a time, resolving each before moving on. For every question, offer your own recommended answer.
Ask one question at a time.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore it instead.
If during the interview you sense the scope is actually multiple independent features (separate goals, different code paths, would ship as separate PRs), **pause and propose a split**. Show 2–5 one-line options and ask the user to pick which one to spec first.
Continue the interview for *only* that one. The others stay outside the repo — the user manages them wherever they keep their backlog (issue tracker, notes, their head). Do **not** mention them in the spec. Do **not** add a "follow-up" or "future work" section. Do **not** create a roadmap file. The spec describes only the work being executed now.
When the user wants to do another one later, they invoke `interview-to-spec` again with that idea as the input.
When the interview converges, write the spec to `spec/<short-task-slug>.md` (create the directory if missing). Use these sections:
Keep the spec focused on the *what* and *why*. Implementation details belong in a later step.
A spec-driven development pipeline for Claude Code and Codex CLI. Refine the spec before you code, let TDD enforce it, verify nothing slipped, then review.
Turn a bug symptom into a fix with a regression test that locks it down. If the user opens vague ("there's a bug", "/diagnose"), interview them one question at…
Kick off the full feature workflow — interview-to-spec, optional spec-approach, tdd, verify, then review — when starting a new feature from scratch. Thin…
Add a refined `## Approach` section to an existing feature spec.md before TDD executes it. Reads the spec, explores the codebase to ground the approach in real…
Drives feature work and bug fixes through a tight failing-test-first loop. Trigger when implementing, fixing, or refactoring behavior in a codebase that…