doing-a-simple-two-sta…
Use when analyzing a large corpus of text, code, or data that exceeds a single agent's effective context - orchestrates parallel Worker subagents, Critic…
Use when the user wants to review their recent Claude Code sessions for patterns — analyzes the last N sessions (default 5) in the current project, dispatching parallel reviewers per session, then synthesizing cross-session findings
$ npx -y skills add ed3dai/ed3d-plugins --skill review-recent-sessions --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/review-recent-sessionsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when the user wants to review their recent Claude Code sessions for patterns — analyzes the last N sessions (default 5) in the current project, dispatching parallel reviewers per session, then synthesizing cross-session findings
name: review-recent-sessions description: Use when the user wants to review their recent Claude Code sessions for patterns — analyzes the last N sessions (default 5) in the current project, dispatching parallel reviewers per session, then synthesizing cross-session findings
Review multiple recent sessions from the current project directory to identify cross-session patterns.
**Do not use nested subagents.** This workflow may dispatch first-level reviewer and synthesis agents. Those agents must read the provided files directly and must not dispatch additional subagents.
The user may invoke this as:
Use the current session's transcript path to determine the project directory. The transcript path looks like:
~/.claude/projects/-Users-ed-Development-.../SESSION_ID.jsonl
The directory containing it is the project's session directory.
If you cannot determine the project directory, ask the user.
Find the most recent JSONL files in the project directory, sorted by modification time, limited to the requested count (default 5).
ls -t "<project_session_dir>"/*.jsonl | head -<count>
Exclude the current session's transcript (the user doesn't want to review the review session itself).
If fewer than 2 sessions are found, tell the user there aren't enough sessions to do a cross-session review and suggest using `/review-session` instead.
Create a working directory:
mkdir -p /tmp/session-review-batch
For each session, run the reduction script:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/reduce-transcript.py" "<session.jsonl>" "/tmp/session-review-batch/reduced-<N>.txt"This can be done in a single bash command with a loop.
For each reduced transcript, dispatch a `conversation-reviewer` agent **in the background**:
<invoke name="Agent"> <parameter name="subagent_type">ed3d-session-reflection:conversation-reviewer</parameter> <parameter name="description">Review session N of M</parameter> <parameter name="model">opus</parameter> <parameter name="run_in_background">true</parameter> <parameter name="prompt"> Review the reduced Claude Code session transcript.
Transcript path: /tmp/session-review-batch/reduced-N.txt Write your findings to: /tmp/session-review-batch/findings-N.md
Read the transcript, analyze it, and write your findings following your output format. Do not dispatch or invoke any subagents. </parameter> </invoke>
Dispatch ALL reviewers in a single message to maximize parallelism. Tell the user you've dispatched N reviewers and are waiting for results.
Once all reviewers complete, dispatch a general-purpose Sonnet agent to synthesize:
<invoke name="Agent"> <parameter name="subagent_type">ed3d-basic-agents:sonnet-general-purpose</parameter> <parameter name="description">Synthesize session reviews</parameter> <parameter name="prompt"> You are synthesizing findings from multiple Claude Code session reviews into a cross-session analysis.
Read all findings files in /tmp/session-review-batch/findings-*.md
Produce a synthesis that identifies:
1. **Recurring patterns** — issues that appear across multiple sessions. These are the highest-value findings because they represent systematic problems.
2. **Progression** — is the user getting better or worse at prompting over time? Is the agent handling certain tasks better or worse?
3. **Highest-impact recommendations** — across all sessions, which recommendations would have the biggest effect? Prioritize:
4. **Session-specific highlights** — any single-session finding that's particularly noteworthy even if it didn't recur.
Write your synthesis to /tmp/session-review-batch/synthesis.md
Format as Markdown. Be specific — reference which sessions showed which patterns. Be concise — this is a summary, not a repetition of individual findings. Do not dispatch or invoke any subagents. </parameter> </invoke>
Read `/tmp/session-review-batch/synthesis.md` and present the full synthesis to the user.
If any individual session findings are particularly interesting, mention that the user can find per-session details in `/tmp/session-review-batch/findings-N.md`.
Ed's repo of Claude Code plugins, centered around a research-plan-implement workflow. Only a tiny bit cursed. If you're lucky.
Repo: ed3dai/ed3d-plugins
Use when analyzing a large corpus of text, code, or data that exceeds a single agent's effective context - orchestrates parallel Worker subagents, Critic…
Use when creating a new Claude Code plugin or setting up plugin structure - provides complete file organization, manifest format, and component definitions for…
Use when creating specialized subagents for Claude Code plugins or the Task tool - covers description writing for auto-delegation, tool selection, prompt…
Use when creating, releasing, or maintaining a Claude Code Plugin Marketplace - covers marketplace.json schema, version management, release checklists,…
Use when completing development phases or branches to identify and update CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files that may have become stale - analyzes what changed,…