/coding-effectively
ALWAYS use this skill when writing or refactoring code. Includes context-dependent sub-skills to empower different coding styles across languages and runtimes.
$ npx -y skills add ed3dai/ed3d-plugins --skill coding-effectively --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/coding-effectively
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
ALWAYS use this skill when writing or refactoring code. Includes context-dependent sub-skills to empower different coding styles across languages and runtimes.
SKILL.md
coding-effectively.SKILL.mdname: coding-effectively
description: ALWAYS use this skill when writing or refactoring code. Includes context-dependent sub-skills to empower different coding styles across languages and runtimes.
user-invocable: false
Coding Effectively
Required Sub-Skills
**ALWAYS REQUIRED:**
- `howto-functional-vs-imperative` - Separate pure logic from side effects
- `defense-in-depth` - Validate at every layer data passes through
**CONDITIONAL:** Use these sub-skills when applicable:
- `howto-code-in-typescript` - TypeScript code
- `howto-code-in-rust` - Rust code
- `howto-develop-with-postgres` - PostgreSQL database code
- `programming-in-react` - React frontend code
- `writing-good-tests` - Writing or reviewing tests
- `property-based-testing` - Tests for serialization, validation, normalization, pure functions
Property-Driven Design
When designing features, think about properties upfront. This surfaces design gaps early.
**Discovery questions:**
| Question | Property Type | Example | |----------|---------------|---------| | Does it have an inverse operation? | Roundtrip | `decode(encode(x)) == x` | | Is applying it twice the same as once? | Idempotence | `f(f(x)) == f(x)` | | What quantities are preserved? | Invariants | Length, sum, count unchanged | | Is order of arguments irrelevant? | Commutativity | `f(a, b) == f(b, a)` | | Can operations be regrouped? | Associativity | `f(f(a,b), c) == f(a, f(b,c))` | | Is there a neutral element? | Identity | `f(x, 0) == x` | | Is there a reference implementation? | Oracle | `new(x) == old(x)` | | Can output be easily verified? | Easy to verify | `is_sorted(sort(x))` |
**Common design questions these reveal:**
- "What about deleted/deactivated entities?"
- "Case-sensitive or not?"
- "Stable sort or not? Tie-breaking rules?"
- "Which algorithm? Configurable?"
Surface these during design, not during debugging.
Core Engineering Principles
Correctness Over Convenience
Model the full error space. No shortcuts.
- Handle all edge cases: race conditions, timing issues, partial failures
- Use the type system to encode correctness constraints
- Prefer compile-time guarantees over runtime checks where possible
- When uncertain, explore and iterate rather than assume
**Don't:**
- Simplify error handling to save time
- Ignore edge cases because "they probably won't happen"
- Use `any` or equivalent to bypass type checking
Error Handling Philosophy
**Two-tier model:**
1. **User-facing errors**: Semantic exit codes, rich diagnostics, actionable messages 2. **Internal errors**: Programming errors that may panic or use internal types
**Error message format:** Lowercase sentence fragments for "failed to {message}".
Good: failed to connect to database: connection refused
Bad: Failed to Connect to Database: Connection Refused
Good: invalid configuration: missing required field 'apiKey'
Bad: Invalid Configuration: Missing Required Field 'apiKey'
Lowercase fragments compose naturally: `"operation failed: " + error.message` reads correctly.
Pragmatic Incrementalism
- Prefer specific, composable logic over abstract frameworks
- Evolve design incrementally rather than perfect upfront architecture
- Don't build for hypothetical future requirements
- Document design decisions and trade-offs when making non-obvious choices
**The rule of three applies to abstraction:** Don't abstract until you've seen the pattern three times. Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction.
File Organization
Descriptive File Names Over Catch-All Files
Name files by what they contain, not by generic categories.
**Don't create:**
- `utils.ts` - Becomes a dumping ground for unrelated functions
- `helpers.ts` - Same problem
- `common.ts` - What isn't common?
- `misc.ts` - Actively unhelpful
**Do create:**
- `string-formatting.ts` - String manipulation utilities
- `date-arithmetic.ts` - Date calculations
- `api-error-handling.ts` - API error utilities
- `user-validation.ts` - User input validation
**Why this matters:**
- Discoverability: Developers find code by scanning file names
- Cohesion: Related code stays together
- Prevents bloat: Hard to add unrelated code to `string-formatting.ts`
- Import clarity: `import { formatDate } from './date-arithmetic'` is self-documenting
**When you're tempted to create utils.ts:** Stop. Ask what the functions have in common. Name the file after that commonality.
Module Organization
- Keep module boundaries strict with restricted visibility
- Platform-specific code in separate files: `unix.ts`, `windows.ts`, `posix.ts`
- Use conditional compilation or runtime checks for platform branching
- Test helpers in dedicated modules/files, not mixed with production code
Cross-Platform Principles
Use OS-Native Logic
Don't emulate Unix on Windows or vice versa. Use each platform's native patterns.
**Bad:** Trying to make Windows paths behave like Unix paths everywhere.
**Good:** Accept platform differences, handle them explicitly.
// Platform-specific behavior
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
// Windows-native approach
} else {
// POSIX approach
}Platform-Specific Files
When platform differences are significant, use separate files:
process-spawn.ts // Shared interface and logic
process-spawn-unix.ts // Unix-specific implementation
process-spawn-windows.ts // Windows-specific implementation
Document Platform Differences
When behavior differs by platform, document it in comments:
// On Windows, this returns CRLF line endings.
// On Unix, this returns LF line endings.
// Callers should normalize if consistent output is needed.
function readTextFile(path: string): string { ... }Test on All Target Platforms
Don't assume Unix behavior works on Windows. Test explicitly:
- CI should run on all supported platforms
- Platform-specific code paths need platform-specific tests
- Document which pla
Read more
name: coding-effectively description: ALWAYS use this skill when writing or refactoring code. Includes context-dependent sub-skills to empower different coding styles across languages and runtimes. user-invocable: false
Coding Effectively
Required Sub-Skills
**ALWAYS REQUIRED:**
- `howto-functional-vs-imperative` - Separate pure logic from side effects
- `defense-in-depth` - Validate at every layer data passes through
**CONDITIONAL:** Use these sub-skills when applicable:
- `howto-code-in-typescript` - TypeScript code
- `howto-code-in-rust` - Rust code
- `howto-develop-with-postgres` - PostgreSQL database code
- `programming-in-react` - React frontend code
- `writing-good-tests` - Writing or reviewing tests
- `property-based-testing` - Tests for serialization, validation, normalization, pure functions
Property-Driven Design
When designing features, think about properties upfront. This surfaces design gaps early.
**Discovery questions:**
| Question | Property Type | Example | |----------|---------------|---------| | Does it have an inverse operation? | Roundtrip | `decode(encode(x)) == x` | | Is applying it twice the same as once? | Idempotence | `f(f(x)) == f(x)` | | What quantities are preserved? | Invariants | Length, sum, count unchanged | | Is order of arguments irrelevant? | Commutativity | `f(a, b) == f(b, a)` | | Can operations be regrouped? | Associativity | `f(f(a,b), c) == f(a, f(b,c))` | | Is there a neutral element? | Identity | `f(x, 0) == x` | | Is there a reference implementation? | Oracle | `new(x) == old(x)` | | Can output be easily verified? | Easy to verify | `is_sorted(sort(x))` |
**Common design questions these reveal:**
- "What about deleted/deactivated entities?"
- "Case-sensitive or not?"
- "Stable sort or not? Tie-breaking rules?"
- "Which algorithm? Configurable?"
Surface these during design, not during debugging.
Core Engineering Principles
Correctness Over Convenience
Model the full error space. No shortcuts.
- Handle all edge cases: race conditions, timing issues, partial failures
- Use the type system to encode correctness constraints
- Prefer compile-time guarantees over runtime checks where possible
- When uncertain, explore and iterate rather than assume
**Don't:**
- Simplify error handling to save time
- Ignore edge cases because "they probably won't happen"
- Use `any` or equivalent to bypass type checking
Error Handling Philosophy
**Two-tier model:**
1. **User-facing errors**: Semantic exit codes, rich diagnostics, actionable messages 2. **Internal errors**: Programming errors that may panic or use internal types
**Error message format:** Lowercase sentence fragments for "failed to {message}".
Good: failed to connect to database: connection refused Bad: Failed to Connect to Database: Connection Refused Good: invalid configuration: missing required field 'apiKey' Bad: Invalid Configuration: Missing Required Field 'apiKey'
Lowercase fragments compose naturally: `"operation failed: " + error.message` reads correctly.
Pragmatic Incrementalism
- Prefer specific, composable logic over abstract frameworks
- Evolve design incrementally rather than perfect upfront architecture
- Don't build for hypothetical future requirements
- Document design decisions and trade-offs when making non-obvious choices
**The rule of three applies to abstraction:** Don't abstract until you've seen the pattern three times. Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction.
File Organization
Descriptive File Names Over Catch-All Files
Name files by what they contain, not by generic categories.
**Don't create:**
- `utils.ts` - Becomes a dumping ground for unrelated functions
- `helpers.ts` - Same problem
- `common.ts` - What isn't common?
- `misc.ts` - Actively unhelpful
**Do create:**
- `string-formatting.ts` - String manipulation utilities
- `date-arithmetic.ts` - Date calculations
- `api-error-handling.ts` - API error utilities
- `user-validation.ts` - User input validation
**Why this matters:**
- Discoverability: Developers find code by scanning file names
- Cohesion: Related code stays together
- Prevents bloat: Hard to add unrelated code to `string-formatting.ts`
- Import clarity: `import { formatDate } from './date-arithmetic'` is self-documenting
**When you're tempted to create utils.ts:** Stop. Ask what the functions have in common. Name the file after that commonality.
Module Organization
- Keep module boundaries strict with restricted visibility
- Platform-specific code in separate files: `unix.ts`, `windows.ts`, `posix.ts`
- Use conditional compilation or runtime checks for platform branching
- Test helpers in dedicated modules/files, not mixed with production code
Cross-Platform Principles
Use OS-Native Logic
Don't emulate Unix on Windows or vice versa. Use each platform's native patterns.
**Bad:** Trying to make Windows paths behave like Unix paths everywhere.
**Good:** Accept platform differences, handle them explicitly.
// Platform-specific behavior
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
// Windows-native approach
} else {
// POSIX approach
}Platform-Specific Files
When platform differences are significant, use separate files:
process-spawn.ts // Shared interface and logic process-spawn-unix.ts // Unix-specific implementation process-spawn-windows.ts // Windows-specific implementation
Document Platform Differences
When behavior differs by platform, document it in comments:
// On Windows, this returns CRLF line endings.
// On Unix, this returns LF line endings.
// Callers should normalize if consistent output is needed.
function readTextFile(path: string): string { ... }Test on All Target Platforms
Don't assume Unix behavior works on Windows. Test explicitly:
- CI should run on all supported platforms
- Platform-specific code paths need platform-specific tests
- Document which pla
Showing the first part of this file.
This is my collection of plugins that I use on a day-to-day basis for getting stuff done with Claude Code. Most of these are development-oriented in some way or another, but also often end up being useful for other things.
Repo: ed3dai/ed3d-plugins
Other skills on ed3d-plugins.
- /doing-a-simple-two-stage-fanout
Use when analyzing a large corpus of text, code, or data that exceeds a single agent's effective context - orchestrates parallel Worker subagents, Critic review subagents, and a final Summarizer subagent with task tracking and failure recovery
Open skill - /using-generic-agents
Use to decide what kind of generic agent you should use
Open skill - /creating-a-plugin
Use when creating a new Claude Code plugin or setting up plugin structure - provides complete file organization, manifest format, and component definitions for commands, agents, skills, hooks, and MCP servers
Open skill - /creating-an-agent
Use when creating specialized subagents for Claude Code plugins or the Task tool - covers description writing for auto-delegation, tool selection, prompt structure, and testing agents
Open skill - /maintaining-a-marketplace
Use when creating, releasing, or maintaining a Claude Code Plugin Marketplace - covers marketplace.json schema, version management, release checklists, changelog conventions, and validation to prevent sync drift between plugin.json and marketplace.json
Open skill - /maintaining-project-context
Use when completing development phases or branches to identify and update CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files that may have become stale - analyzes what changed, determines affected contracts and documentation, and coordinates updates
Open skill

